One social-network repository to rule them all
I've stopped accepting requests to join new social networks. I can barely keep up with one, much less 10. More to the point, I don't want to have silo'd data repositories. It's this last point that keeps me grounded in e-mail.
Sure, we now have OpenID to provide a central clearing house for identity online, but what I really want is to be able to send a Facebook message and have it show up in my e-mail, or somewhere central that I routinely use. I've come to accept that my IM client will be separate from my e-mail client, but I'm not prepared to add a Facebook "client," LinkedIn "client," etc.
Is there something out there to collect and coalesce my social communication? Is anyone providing a central repository for my online communications? If so, sign me up. I'd actually use Facebook if the things I did there were portable to my e-mail client, which was portable to my Flickr activity, which was...you get the idea.
Because each of these social applications forces me to live inside it, rather than connecting to other applications and storing the resulting communication data between them all, I use them sparingly or not at all. This is, I think, what Tim O'Reilly is getting at when he describes the social network as infrastructure rather than applications.
Will someone fix this, please? I think there's a lot of money in being that social network data repository. Heck, if Exchange weren't so creaky, Microsoft should be doing this.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay. 





One minor nitpick around how you're describing OpenID as it is actually not centralized from a technology perspective. It certainly allows you to condense the number of different identities that you use online, but in no means forces you to use just one or as a technology does it operate via a central service.
And of course the downside of this is the exposure of your various "selves" to personal and business associates alike. It's the bane of the MySpace user who created a funny, very personal profile, only to find out too late that a potential boss has carefully reviewed all of those pictures from that wild weekend at Lake Havasu. (Some things are best left silo'ed...)
Its called Flock. It's based on Firefox. I've come to use it as my sole browser now. Give it a try, it might just bring some levity to your situation!!
http://www.flock.com/
Cheers!
Get ready for Cliqset... It's nearly here.
Perhaps Genome will do it next month? I'll be watching with interest.
View Genome CEO's profile at WeCanDo.BIZ: http://www.wecando.biz/profile.php?bid=329
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
- by Jenniferlaurenb September 24, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
- I try to stay current with new networks, but it just gets too overwhelming! I also stick by the principle that there should only be so many ways for a person to be able to get a hold of me, or check out what I'm doing, when I'm doing it....
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)While I agree there should be one centralized way to manage networks, it does appear that some are taking the steps to join forces. (Update Twitter from Facebook status, Myspace toolbar paired with Me.dium Search ( http://me.dium.com/search ) , Facebook integration in Me.dium sidebar---you get the idea. I think these networks understand that we are getting stretched too thin, and that's why they are combining.
Thanks for the article!
-jenny
http://blogme.dium.com