• On Metacritic: How good is BioShock2?
September 15, 2008 8:07 AM PDT

A sign that Microsoft is becoming the world's biggest law firm

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

There was some distressing news buried in Sean Michael Kerner's look into Novell's and Microsoft's virtualization partnership. The news, however, had nothing to do with virtualization, and everything to do with Microsoft job titles.

This was a product announcement, yet Microsoft resorted to its legal department for quotations??? (Novell, of course, offered up a "senior product marketing manager." It has yet to become a licensing company, and is still focused on thriving as a software company.)

The two Microsoft employees quoted have bizarro job titles:

  • Monty O'Kelley, technical director of legal and corporate affairs at Microsoft
  • Brent Phillips, senior product manager for intellectual property and licensing at Microsoft

Every big company has a healthy-sized legal department. Microsoft? Well, if it's passing out job titles like this, I'm guessing it has run out of titles like "product marketing manager" and "developer" and is instead doing weird mash-ups between its engineering teams and legal.

When you have someone whose job it is to come up with "intellectual property and licensing products," you've lost your way. Most software companies focus on selling (gasp!) software. Not, apparently, Microsoft.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is chief operating officer at Canonical, the company behind the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Prior to Canonical, Matt was general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, an open-source applications company. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
What today's tech is teaching tomorrow's workforce
Google vs. Microsoft marketing
The application is the new the operating system
Oracle loses some MySQL mojo
From Alfresco to Canonical
Apple, Google, and the importance of Bing
Thank heaven for Apple's (upward) pricing pressure
Which open-source vendors can afford the cloud?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by cowatson September 15, 2008 8:47 AM PDT
"Well, if it's passing out job titles like this, I'm guessing it has run out of titles like "product marketing manager" and "developer" and is instead doing weird mash-ups between its engineering teams and legal."<br /><br />You know what they say, crap in one hand and guess in the other and see which one fills up first.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 September 15, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
The leaps of logic Asay make are truly astounding. He can lightly bound from one unconnected place to another without even a whisper of logical support. <br />"OMG! They have funny titles for their jobs. THIS MUST MEAN THAT THEY ARE DOOMED FOR FAILURE!"<br /><br />***?
Reply to this comment
by johnwest72 September 15, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
STOP THE MADNESS!!! CNET, 90% of what this guy talks about is Microsoft. Remove him from your blog rolls! And yes, you may ask why I still read him. The problem is that I don't have a choice to filter him from my RSS reader. If I had a "Filter biased, anti-Microsoft guys who sell competing products (his company competes with Sharepoint... which explains the bias)" button, I'd use it!
Reply to this comment
by fredtheviking September 15, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
I don't about the other readers, but anti-microsoft baised is a sentiment felt by many who are forced to use Microsoft software. Either because there is nothing better or it is work related... and so on. No, Linux is not better. I have used Linux and would never use it for my personal computer. I do mean NEVER. The last I need is a comment about how great linux is. As all as you have the patience to learn if which I don't.
Reply to this comment
by mikalg September 15, 2008 10:46 AM PDT
Matt, you are stretching logic with the title/facts of your story! Dear God, why do you make a leap between a job title and whether a company is a software company and a legal firm? As you should already know, any law firm worth its salt should have among its officers an individual titled: CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER. Therefore, by your asinine logic, the law firms of the United States should be correctly considered SOFTWARE, or COMPUTING companies? Your Anti-Microsoft soapbox is getting very rickety, and maybe you should steady yourself before making nonsensical blogs posts such as this. I have long considered you an MS bigot... but at least sometimes you had a point/factual if slanted point of view. This Blog story is simply put: non-credible vomit, that frankly means nothing to anyone with any sense whatsoever.
Reply to this comment
by TexasTWylite September 15, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
I worry more about companies that have some sort of "evangelist" position, as a lot of tech companies do. They make themselves sound like religious cults.
Reply to this comment
by john55440 September 15, 2008 10:55 AM PDT
According to Hoover's, Microsoft has 91,000 employees. And the company is doomed to failure because you don't like two Microsoft Job Descriptions? Get Real.
Reply to this comment
by shikarishambu September 15, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
I fear for companies that have Matt As(s)ay on their rolls / allow him to publish
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight September 15, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
Now they are switching to the business of protection instead of development.
Reply to this comment
by softwaredesignengineer September 15, 2008 11:25 AM PDT
The title of this post has a lot of typo. <br /><br />Should read as "A sign that Matt Asay is becoming more and more irrelavent in terms of logic against at anything Microsoft"
Reply to this comment
by theopensourcerer September 15, 2008 1:25 PM PDT
Jeez you lot. Get real.<br /><br />Outside of the USA we aren't run by or beholden to lawyers. We think of them more like parasites... <br /><br />What Microsoft choose to do is their own business but AFAIC it's just a waste of money.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

Google's social side aims for some Buzz

Facebook and Twitter are the darlings of the social-media world, not Google--which hopes to change that with Buzz, betting it can organize your online social life.

Watching the birth of a gaming start-up

Stewart Butterfield and his friends are back at it with a new company. CNET's Daniel Terdiman was given exclusive, behind-the-scenes access as they built it from scratch.

advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is chief operating officer at Canonical, the company behind the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Prior to Canonical, Matt was general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, an open-source applications company. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right