August 25, 2008 8:07 AM PDT

Picturing Linux vs. Windows security

by Matt Asay
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

For those that may be more visually inclined, looking at a few pictures may prove instructive in Linux (and Apache) vs. Windows (and IIS) web server security. The more convoluted the system, the more opportunities to exploit its security:

The basic argument goes like this. In its long evolution, Windows has grown so complicated that it is harder to secure. Well, these images make the point very well. Both images are a complete map of the system calls that occur when a web server serves up a single page of html with a single picture. The same page and picture. A system call is an opportunity to address memory. A hacker investigates each memory access to see if it is vulnerable to a buffer overflow attack. The developer must do QA on each of these entry points. The more system calls, the greater potential for vulnerability, the more effort needed to create secure applications.

I don't think this is by any means conclusive, but have a peek at the Linux/Apache system calls and the Windows/IIS system calls. Both are fairly complex, but Windows takes the prize for King of Convolution.

Does this mean Linux is more secure? Not necessarily, but perhaps it does indicate that Linux can be more easily secured.

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay.
Recent posts from The Open Road
Open source became big business in 2009
Will we see an open-source IPO in 2010?
Could Apache keep Google's regulators at bay?
Red Hat's Q3 earnings defy gravity
Canonical's opportunity to simplify Ubuntu
Google--not necessarily 'more open than thou'
Is it Ballmer's fault?
Hungary votes for open standards
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by pizzapanther August 25, 2008 8:55 AM PDT
Apache is a bloated program in my opinion of which I avoid as much as possible. I would like to see the same picture of Lighttpd. For a small foot print and ease of use Lighttpd beats Apache hands down. Even Linux programs can get convoluted but at least you have a lot more choices especially in the web server area.
Reply to this comment
by nabeelmoidu August 26, 2008 12:53 AM PDT
Matt
I normally read your articles for some good insight on the latest in open source and linux and I like it a lot. Its the only blog in my firefox bookmarks toolbar. But this post with two figures at least 3 years old and a link to another 4 year old article from a website that's known more for its sarcasm than anything serious isn't what we expect from a veteran like you, especially in a topic so crazily debated amongst open source enthusiasts and their opponents.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right