iPhone 3G: From 'must have' to 'maybe later'
I waited in line for the iPhone 3G. I had actually bought an iPhone just a few months ago, but wanted to upgrade.
I didn't really know why: I just figured the next version of what Apple was doing could only be cool. I'm a Mac fan.
As I wrote here, however, Apple and AT&T completely botched the activation process, leaving me without the iPhone 3G and, frankly, without much desire to undergo the ordeal again. Apple continues to ration the iPhone 3G for AT&T stores (the one place where you're pretty much guaranteed to have the phone activated), while its Apple retail stores are awash in the iPhones (but also awash in activation problems).
Meanwhile, I've yet to talk to anyone that can point to a clear, compelling differentiator between the new iPhone and the original iPhone. Yes, it's faster, but I spend most of my time around Wi-Fi and not enough time around a power outlet to care as much about 3G as I thought I would.
Indeed, the Web is swarming with lots of reasons to not "upgrade" to the iPhone 3G. Poor battery life, difficulty switching between 3G and 2(.5)G coverage, and a buggy and not-so-great 2.0 software experience whether you're on the 3G or 2G version of the iPhone.
Apple relies on an emotional response to its products to sell them, at least initially. For example, once you've used OS X you'll never go back to Windows, but that first leap of faith is just that: a leap of faith that you're willing to take because the UI is so beautiful. You recognize the power after the purchase.
If Apple continues to screw up the initial, emotional connection to its products through activation issues, buggy software, etc., at some point it's going to hurt its sales. I'm a Mac fan, but I've decided to pass on the iPhone 3G for the foreseeable future. I imagine I'm not alone.
Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to The Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure. You can follow Matt on Twitter @mjasay. 





That said, I can understand your treabitation for the iPhone as it currently stands. I can't say that I am all that interested in the device as it stands currently. But then I am looking for more of a toy that I can play with than a fashion phone. So I guess that I am not a target of the market Apple wishes to serve.
You're anger issues are personal, and irrational. Especially over their handling over security issues. Your personal feelings would only make sense if you were having problems because those issues were affecting your system, and others. The iPhone itself, is perfectly fine. The caveat with the iPhone is AT&T, and MobileMe. You can bet your bottom dollar that MobileMe will get better, but you can bet your bottom dollar that AT&T will still be AT&T.
I want a new one, have the previous one, but I don't want to wrestle with AT&T again. So I am hoping, that some legislation will be passed to make AT&T's lock (despite the contract), illegal.
Apple created, what many viewed, as the way phones should be activated. Simple, easy, and even if there were problems at least you were at home.
This second time around, all that went away ... why? Someone please tell me why. Three letters and an ampersand.
-Jebulldog117
By the time I get round to buying I don't expect there to continue to be activation problems, but then I didn't hear of any in Belgium to begin with. Actually finding a phone to buy in the first place is probably the biggest issue...
My wife still has the 2G iPhone and I DEFINITELY get better reception then she does. I'll usually have 2-3 bars more then she does in the same location.
The bad, the 2.0 software is buggy, but this is NOT a 3G iPhone issue. This is a software issue. Unlike most smartphones there will be several updates over the next year which will improve most of these issues.
I'm not arguing that the device should be closed, but rather that you have to be careful what you wish for. FYI, I purchased on launch day in the evening, and was activated in three minutes, with no problems since. I imagine that I'm not alone either.
Additional improvements that are welcome are the increased memory capacity from my original 8gig model, incorporated GPS, and the speediness of the data network which has made searching for Wi-Fi when connecting to the itnernet largely unnecessary except when downloading large applications or music.
As for me I will wait for RIM to finally deliver the Bold and wait for Apple to deliver v.3 on the next platform.
That said, I admit to being a bit of a techno brat myself, so here's my rant: I too purchased a 1st Gen iPhone at the end of April after finally finding myself unburdened from the chains of one Contract du Sprint & a nearly-bricked Samsung Whatever. After a fairly extensive amount of research, I was satisfied that the 2G iPhone was still the best bet for my needs, so I plunked down the ridiculous amount of $500+ and was, for the most part, delighted. Hmm.
Someone above mentioned Apple's issues with "disclosure". I have only in the last few years become an Apple fan, and now have several products. However, without fail, when I've purchased each product, a few weeks to a month or so later they have come out with a "brand new" version of that product, and of course it's conveniently just past the 14-day period in which I could upgrade. Having been burned enough (I foolishly thought), I looked everywhere for anything about a new model. I did find a few articles about a 2nd gen iPhone, but these were nothing but unconfirmed outsider rumor and speculation. I discovered nothing that led me to believe there was definitely a new model on the horizon, and most certainly nothing about a timeframe. This was late March, early April. Due to the few unsubstantiated rumors, though, I wanted to be sure, so I made 2 trips to the store, spoke to 3 different sales associates and the manager, as well as chatted with two online sales reps. Needless to say, THEY ALL LIED. Each one...EACH ONE! ---claimed they had heard "nothing" of an impending iPhone release, and that I could be waiting a long time for a 2nd gen. One even went so far as to tell me this was virtually impossible as the (insert technobabble here) could not happen without completely changing the entire (more technobabble). Turns out if I'd waited just 4 weeks, if any one of them had simply said "who knows? Give it a month or so and check with us again..", I'd at least have been eligible for the 3G and paid $200 less for it. They did it to me again, but this time it was direct and overt. Outright deception as opposed to lack of information.
Thus techno brat is glad the launch was a disaster and that there's little appreciable difference between the two, except for the battery suck.
Who's greenlighting this stuff, anyway? I guess I'd be really fuming if they had not only stolen an extra $200 from me, lied to me, but if they'd also done a real upgrade! Something like, oh, I don't know, turn-by-turn GPS? Instead of the silly "Look Ma! I'm a walking dot!" version... or stereo speakers, or a (badly needed) landscape keyboard. Or MMS, or better camera placement, or video capability, or voice recognition. Nope. It can pull up a site about 21 seconds faster than 2G (C-NET test), it can show you 25 starbucks within walking distance of your location (that is, when it's not insisting you're currently in Houston, as it has for a number of 3G owners), and it's got a fancy app store with buggy apps (oh wait...never mind, got that).
So I'm good with the one I got, and if I purchase anything Apple in the future, I will accept that a newer cheaper better model is just around the corner (yes, as with all tech products, to an extent, but my experience with Apple has been shamelessly so every single time), and if a rep's mouth is moving, I'll know it's another deliberate falsehood. Sure doesn't sound like the amazing company my technophile friends insisted I come over to.....
i know someone who works at an apple store and they are indeed not allowed to speculate or talk about any rumors. apple VERY carefully controls all aspects of customer interaction to give a positive user experience.
my interaction with apple products has been a disaster, being a windows user who learned at a young age you need to "tweak the product and try all the check boxes and options to see what it really does and what doesnt work" in a windows environment. that mentality with an apple product is a good way to screw it up (and I did!)
i was one of the idiots who waited in line for 2+ hours and confirmed over the phone with AT&T that my account was ready and i was eligible for the iphone 3g only to finally walk into the store and get denied. it was a very disappointing experience, and all the Apple store people could do was send me to an AT&T store empty-handed.
Also for those to numb to realize the issue let me point out an article that indicates why Apple may be having their 3G issues, and it's not firmware:
http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=A1WJWVXKZ4NS0QSNDLOSKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=209100058
- by logictrap July 30, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
- I have OSX and Vista and am still waiting to find something about OSX that makes it better. It sure does cost more to have an OSX system...I wonder if Apple will ever figure out how to resize a window other than from the lower right corner...or build a file management system that's useful for people with more than a few documents...as for the iPhone (apple products in general actually) it's like buying a BMW vs a Honda - Apple costs more but you don't really get more...unless you're easily indoctrinated with cultish marketing propaganda...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Thomas, David July 30, 2008 10:23 AM PDT
- Nice try, obviously you want to bait someone.
- Like this
-
- by logictrap July 30, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
- Apple made cost comparisons much easier when it changed to intel (which it claimed for years was inferior). Your response is typical for a mac user - just a denial without any substance to back it up. Sorry you spent more but didn't get more.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (49 Comments)In one sentence you state "It sure does not cost more to have an OSX system", then in your last one "Apple costs more but you don't really get more".
"I wonder if Apple will ever figure out how to resize ..." they can, they won't, and what's the problem. This is no indication of lacking functionality. You can resize windows, different systems do it differently.
"or build a file management system that's useful for people with more than a few documents" Well now I have very serious doubts as to the validity of your claim that you even have OSX OR Vista. If anything, the ability for users to access, and manipulate their files in a myriad of ways, OSX has lead over Vista. If you have OSX, you simply don't use it.
The ONLY propaganda here is your comment.
Aren't you the same guy told us the PowerPC was the way to go but are now posting your nonsense from an intel pc? lol