• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
November 12, 2009 9:26 AM PST

NASA launches Web resource for 2012 predictions

by Don Reisinger
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 28 comments

Over the past few weeks, we've heard more and more about 2012 when, according to some, the world will end. Responding to all that talk with a healthy dose of skepticism, scientists at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration have launched a Web page to dispel the myths surrounding the momentous occasion.

On an FAQ page called, "2012: Beginning of the End or Why the World Won't End?" NASA wrote that much like the Y2K scare a decade ago, the end of the world won't come in 2012.

"Impressive movie special effects aside, December 21, 2012, won't be the end of the world as we know," NASA scientists wrote on its 2012 page. "It will, however, be another winter solstice."

According to NASA scientists, "nothing bad will happen to the Earth in 2012." The scientists wrote on the page that "our planet has been getting along just fine for more than 4 billion years, and credible scientists worldwide know of no threat associated with 2012."

But it's further down on the page where the scientists bring out the big guns. They said although the myth surrounding 2012 contends planets will align and crash into Earth, "there are no planetary alignments in the next few decades, Earth will not cross the galactic plane in 2012, and even if these alignments were to occur, their effects on the Earth would be negligible. Each December the Earth and sun align with the approximate center of the Milky Way galaxy but that is an annual event of no consequence."

In the end, it was a simple comment from NASA senior research scientist Don Yeomans that might sum up the agency's feelings on 2012: "There apparently is a great deal of interest in celestial bodies, and their locations and trajectories at the end of the calendar year 2012. Now, I for one love a good book or movie as much as the next guy. But the stuff flying around through cyberspace, TV, and the movies is not based on science."

Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Cutting Edge
Shuttle Atlantis glides home after station visit
CERN particle accelerator sees first collisions
IBM taps into group language translation
Atlantis astronaut's wife gives birth 220 miles below
NASA signs 'The Rock' to make it seem cool
Large Hadron Collider up and running again
Fortified rice, fuel cells among Tech Award winners
Shuttle Atlantis completes smooth station linkup
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cdotspace November 12, 2009 10:25 AM PST
I call this the Y2K12 crisis - a bunch of hype for whats going to turn out to be nothing.
Reply to this comment
by Renderman2009 November 12, 2009 10:46 AM PST
It's being misinterpreted - The Mayans never said the world will end on 21st Dec 2012, they meant the passing of an age to another. It's the end of the age of Pisces and the coming of a new age - the age of Aquarian.
Reply to this comment
by DragonStab November 12, 2009 12:20 PM PST
I think the Mayan who was making the Calendar probably just got tired and stopped at 2012. Or ran out of space or materials.

Or his wife told him he was wasting too much time on his crazy hobby and made him stop.
1 person likes this comment
by gerrrg November 12, 2009 12:23 PM PST
Wait what? The age of Aquarius? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9oq_IskRIg
1 person likes this comment
by btljooz November 12, 2009 1:16 PM PST
@Renderman2009:

Ughm... ... ... EXACTLY what does the Mayan Calendar have to do with Middle Eastern Astrology??? While you are correct in that the Mayans never said the world will end on Dec. 21, 2012 and that they only inferred that a new age would begin, you are totally incorrect in correlating the Mayan philosophy about the start of a new age in THEIR Calender with the Middle Eastern Astrological event of the beginning of The Age of Aquarius. Here's an education about The Age of Aquarius:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=1Oh&ei=i3n8Svv1HoXSsQOJ_-WFBw&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CAYQBSgA&q=Astrological+Age+of+Aquarius&spell=1

I strongly suggest you actually use that link to learn more about what you're trying to talk about.
by Renderman2009 November 13, 2009 7:02 AM PST
I read this book: http://www.amazon.com/Aquarians-Ancient-ProphecyA-Modern-Phenomenon/dp/0595443028/

Maybe you should email the author.
by btljooz November 14, 2009 10:51 AM PST
Renderman2009, THAT is simply a NOVEL!!! You believe every piece of fiction you read?

From the author's Youtube Channel here: http://www.youtube.com/user/cameronguy88

>" 2012 MAYAN CALENDAR & THE AGE OF AQUARIUS
From: cameronguy88 | August 24, 2008 | 35,145 views
http://www.amazon.com/Aquarians-Ancient-ProphecyA-Modern-...


2012 isn't the end of time, it is the beginning of a whole new reality. The more scholars study the writings of the ancient Mayans, the more they are convinced that 2012 was not prophesied to be the end of the world, but the moment which will herald a momentous shift in human consciousness.

Exposing this ideal is what led me to write "The Aquarians," an adventure tale that takes four unlikely characters on a journey of scientific and spiritual discovery. Through them, a story unfolds that weaves together information about the Mayan calendar, dolphin echolocation, the Age of Aquarius, the 11:11 Phenomenon, and the idea that we must co-create the hopeful future we desire for ourselves and this planet.

Synchronicity and circumstance are not only the guiding forces at work in my novel, they are what shaped the story even before I wrote the first word. From the moment I declared that I was going to write a spiritual adventure, a never-ending string of unlikely miracles have occurred to make this book a reality. It is with awe and gratitude that I look back at the circumstances of the last few years, realizing now that all I had to do was keep my eyes, ears and heart open and my hands typing the information as it materialized!

And since the publication of "The Aquarians," the synchronicities just keep happening. The new wave of people - shamans, guides and earth-angels - coming into my life could only be described as pure magic. One of these is J. Walker, a talented rap artist who focuses his gift on sharing a positive message of hope to troubled inner-city teens. A person aligned with the ideals of the Aquarian Age, J. volunteered to write and perform the song in this video. I'm amazed that in less than four minutes, he was able to expose and describe the "shift" in our spiritual evolution that is taking place right now all over the world. You can hear more of J's music by visiting

http://www.rhymecology.com

If you choose to purchase a copy of my book, thank you. More importantly, however, I hope you choose to embrace the love, compassion, forgiveness and hope that The Age of Aquarius is all about. If we focus our intention on making this world a better place (and if nothing else, 2012 is certainly giving humanity a focal point), this planet will in fact become that place.

Peace, Love and Light,

Eric Rankin
August, 2008 (and counting...)

You can read more about the information in my book, as well as take a free "Aquarian Personality Test", by visiting

http://www.myspace.com/TheAquarians
... (more info)
(less info)
View comments, related videos, and more"<
by reader24 November 14, 2009 11:10 AM PST
It's time to learn the difference between fiction and nonfiction. The cover of the book says "Novel". Do you know what that means? It means that it was a work of fiction, and although there may be some credible information in the book, the majority of it is made up by the author to create a fantasy for the readers' enjoyment, not to add to the scientific knowledge base.

No one needs to email the author, he already knows he was writing fiction. You need to get a clue. I could write a novel about how the Queen of England used to eat babies, but that wouldn't make it scientific fact, it would make it fiction.
by startouch November 12, 2009 10:53 AM PST
I have a problem with this and i will say why ,
1) why do we find bones of ocean creatures in places like Colorado or embedded in the sides of mountains if continental drift is soooo slow & how did oceans exist on these continents / i think a deluge would explain this better (magnetic pole shift ) is logical ,if the Earth were to flip this would explain why ocean creatures were found where they have been ,since the earths oceans would wash over the earth taking these creatures with it and depositing there remains where we have found them..
2) how we find other planets is that we look at one and calculate its "wobble" to find others around it .the "wobble " is created by the magnetic pull on one planet by another ,and this can and has disturbed other planetary body's in the past and collision's have occurred or magnetic shifts on the planet affected.
Reply to this comment
by cp256 November 12, 2009 11:11 AM PST
Planetary wobble is caused by gravity, not magnetics and we look at the star, not the planet. Back to science class for you!
by PNFractal November 12, 2009 12:15 PM PST
Oh please tell me startouch is a Poe. I'll be kind and echo cp256: Back to science class you you!
by gerrrg November 12, 2009 1:18 PM PST
That you would add an apostrophe to a non-possessive plural (collision's instead of collisions) and neglect it from a possessive singular noun (earths instead of Earth's), as well as improperly form your plurals (body's instead of bodies) speaks volumes.

Back to English class as well!
by reader24 November 14, 2009 11:18 AM PST
Why would you post two incorrect and irrelevant comments?
by Pride73170 November 12, 2009 12:33 PM PST
I don't believe in any of the hype, but NASA proclaiming that the earth won't end makes me a little uneasy. Let's identify all near earth objects, and start finding some of the smaller stuff before it hits or passes our rear-view mirror. Let's also hope that Betelgeuse doesn't go supernova in the next few years as it's likely to cause mass panic as it will dominate the night sky and will even be quite visible during the daytime (depending on the season the event takes place.) Despite being 600 light years away, doomsayers are sure to scare the hell out of anyone who will listen.
Reply to this comment
by btljooz November 12, 2009 1:06 PM PST
So what if Betelgeuse goes super nova! Here's an astronomy lesson for you AND all the "doomsayers": Super Nova 1054. READ about it here:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=6y1&ei=R3j8SraUDomMtAPGwLiJBw&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CA0QBSgA&q=%22Supernova+1054&spell=1

There's some extremely interesting reading there!
by Tod Smith November 12, 2009 1:49 PM PST
What NASA fails to say was the following:

The Earth is:

1. Undergoing a Polar Shift
2. The Earth is losing the protection barrier of the Sun
3. Something hit just Saturn and no one saw it coming
Reply to this comment
by boeush November 12, 2009 3:37 PM PST
If by "Polar Shift" you mean a possible planetary magnetic field reversal, then your items 1. and 2. are in fact one item, not two (they're referring to the same phenomenon.) Even if the magnetic field really is in the process of reversing, this will take hundreds if not thousands of years; it's not the sort of thing that happens overnight or even within a single decade.

Regarding something that hit Saturn, it's a little hard to see asteroids all the way from Earth to Saturn's orbit. That far from the Sun, they're much fainter than near-Earth asteroids (because from their position, the Sun appears much dimmer), not to mention that the distance from us to them compounds the problem again (brightness decreases as inverse square of distance, for anything other than lased light.) So yes, there are lots of things we can't see, even with state-of-the-art modern technology. However, any notion that Aztecs could see something that top-flight modern tech cannot, is on its face not just ludicrous, but outright deranged.
by ALREADY_GONE November 12, 2009 4:19 PM PST
All we need now is a 'New Theme Song!'

"I want to party like it's 1999" just won't work!
Reply to this comment
by Tod Smith November 13, 2009 5:13 AM PST
2. No, I referring to the Sun only and the the magnetic situtation of the Earth. Look it up! Something is changing the Suns protection radus!
Reply to this comment
by rickvonder November 14, 2009 12:05 AM PST
Yea right! Solar eruptions, called coronal mass ejections (CME) are always taking place which disturbs the magnetic field of our Earth. Its not easy to predict when its going to occur.

For me Science will never go beyond the philosophy and belief. Its only a part of it. Many cultures have itentified the occurence of something big during that time. Go watch the tv show "Nostradamus:2012" aired by the History channel. (Watch atleast for once, its a good docu.) Watch it and you will find these guys are not fool? More or less something is sure going to occur. And why would NASA or other people ever tell you for even 0.1% probability of any such event. Wont this create a big panic among all?
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ November 14, 2009 11:43 AM PST
" And why would NASA or other people ever tell you for even 0.1% probability of any such event. Wont this create a big panic among all? "

Oh crap. I was hoping it was all a farce, but now that the government is confirming that it's all a farce, it must be true! Shoot!!! We're doomed!
by November 14, 2009 1:54 PM PST
To be honest, this entire commentary is quite amusing, bashing over this...bashing over that.
To be honest, Science can be accurate but there is always a chance something is unseen.

To explain oceanic animals found on land. There is billions of years that this earth has transformed, mounts happened when plates collided which is why you will find oceanic fossils on mountains. That was explained in 6th grade(only reason I remember was because my teacher had a good looking chest; puberty, you can learn about that too)

Polarity shift is a good possibility and unpredictable. how it coincides with the Mayan calender with no actual evidence is drunken bar talk. (Drinking, you can learn about that too)

The principle of my simple rant is null and void all of this hearsay. How about we talk about it in....say...2 years and like 46 days? Oh shucks that's 2013...you know, the number after 2012. Math will teach you this.
Reply to this comment
by rickvonder November 15, 2009 9:44 AM PST
true! Whatever it may be, we should enjoy each and every moment of our life. We dont know our fates but still know that end is certain for all.
by tgaudin November 15, 2009 2:19 PM PST
NASA' s answer is quite telling" Our planet has been getting along just fine for more than 4 billion years,and "credible" scientists worldwide know of no threat associated with 2012" This answer implies
that if " credible" scientists are not aware of any threats none exists which in turns also implies that the sum total of knowledge resides with them in total contradiction with one cardinal rule which states: " Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" which means that in the case of the " credible scientists " it is a case of evidence of absence of knowledge. Futhermore, to state that the planet has been just fine for 4 billion years is a complete condescending misrepresentation of known scientific facts. Was the Sahara desert always a desert? How about the atlantic ocean's " conveyor belt that violently and quite suddenly crashed and flipped as recorded on the deep ocean floor?One problem "the credible scientists" do not know the trigger mechanism behind it...the list is exhaustive...Now as far
as the Mayans and the year 2012 as an ending date of a world age (and not the world),The same state of affairs is present : No " credible scientist " has a clue as to what they were measuring in the same way to this day ' No credible scientist ,looking at the world age of the Sumerian measurement found in their King's list from creation to the flood, can tell you what they were actually recording .Since no credible answers on their part is forthcoming it becomes a subject matter up for " grab " hence,the charlatans and movie makers and anything in and between are free to take over as they see fit ( and make money in the process). The sad reality of this state of affair is that' honest and credible research in these areas becomes impossible unless you do not mind to add "Nostradamus " to your last name.
Reply to this comment
by skatelif7 November 16, 2009 5:09 PM PST
Honestly we could just be hit by a gamma burst from a supernova 500,000 light years away and have everyone and thing be vaporized and never see it coming. That scares me more than some thousands of years old cannibals and their calendar.
Reply to this comment
by dnscaching November 16, 2009 11:32 PM PST
aren't this the same people that missed 2 massive asteroids hurtling towards earth?
Reply to this comment
by klickinc November 17, 2009 7:42 AM PST
The poles do change polarity infact it happens about ever 10,000 years, it does it rather quickly will it effect our "wobble" most say no but no one is 100 percent sure. when is it going to happen? probably withen next 300 to 500 years. not anytime in any of our life times or childrens life times. i could not imagine it having a negative effect infact it may decrease suns radiation some. due to the fact that the south poles magnetic feild is stronger than the north poles. so it may be beneficial. will it destroy the world? i dont think so. theres no evidence to show that huge claticlismic issues happen when these poles change.
Reply to this comment
by btljooz November 17, 2009 4:52 PM PST
There is a lot of conjecture on the subject of Polar Shift, but the best place to start learning about all of this conjecture is here:

http://www.crystalinks.com/poleshifts.html

Never know when one might learn something NEW! Happy reading!
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Cutting Edge

Keep up-to-date on cutting-edge research and what's new in a wide range of areas from robotics, space ventures and general science to automobile design and solar energy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Cutting Edge topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right