• On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
June 23, 2009 12:00 AM PDT

Roadrunner continues to outpace supercomputing field

by Erica Ogg
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 16 comments

IBM Roadrunner Top500 supercomputer

Roadrunner maintains its lead as the fastest supercomputer in the world.

(Credit: IBM)

Despite the Jaguar nipping at its heels, Roadrunner continues to speed past the supercomputing pack.

That's according to the twice yearly Top500 list of the fastest supercomputers in the world, which is to be announced Tuesday morning at the 2009 International Supercomputing Conference in Hamburg, Germany. The list is released in June and November every year.

The IBM supercomputer housed at the Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory, known as Roadrunner, maintains the lead it grabbed a year ago. The computer can process 1.105 petaflop/s, or quadrillions of floating point operations per second, according to the Top500 Linpack benchmark. Hot on its heels for the second year in a row is the Cray XT5 Jaguar system at the DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which clocked in at 1.059 petaflop/s.

Despite the consistency of those top two systems, there were some newcomers to the top 10 of the list of 500 this year, and not from within the U.S. The new IBM computer, known as JUGENE, installed at Forschungszentrum Juelich in Germany hit 825.5 teraflop/s, or trillions of floating point operations per second, which was good enough for third place on the list. Forschungszentrum Juelich also is home to the 10th place supercomputer, JUROPA, which is a combination of Bull Novascale and Sun Sunblade x6048 servers. It achieved 274.8 teraflop/s.

The rest of the top 10 fastest computers in the world are all housed in the U.S. But some notable international sites are demanding attention. An IBM BlueGene/P system at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia took 14th place, while the Dawning 5000A at the Shanghai Supercomputer Center in China took 15th place.

The threshold to get on the Top500 list this year got increasingly tough. The slowest computer on the list hit 17.1 teraflop/s, when six months ago the slowest computer on the list achieved 12.64 teraflop/s. That also means the total combined power of the 500 supercomputers is faster than ever at 22.6 petaflop/s. Six months ago the top 500 hit 16.95 petaflop/s, and 11.7 petaflop/s a year ago.

Despite holding some of the top spots, IBM's overall dominance as the top supplier of servers for these supercomputers has been eclipsed by Hewlett-Packard. While IBM leads in overall installed performance, HP has the greater market share at 212 to IBM's 188.

Inside those servers, Intel has the lion's share of processors, with just under 80 percent, or 399 of the top 500. IBM Power processors are the second-most popular, and can be found in 55 of the systems.

The Top 10 List:

• Roadrunner, IBM, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1.105 petaflop/s)
• Jaguar, Cray, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1.059 petaflop/s)
• JUGENE, IBM, Forschungszentrum Juelich (825.5 teraflop/s)
• Pleiades, SGI, NASA Ames Research Center (487.01 teraflop/s)
• BlueGeneL, IBM, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (478.2 teraflop/s)
• Kraken XT5, Cray, National Institute for Computational Sciences (463.3 teraflop/s)
• BlueGene/P, IBM, Argonne National Laboratory (458.61 teraflop/s)
• Ranger, Sun, Texas Advanced Computing Center (433.20 teraflop/s)
• Dawn, IBM, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (415.70 teraflop/s)
• JUROPA, Bull SA, Forschungszentrum Juelich (274.80 teraflop/s)

Erica Ogg is a CNET News reporter who covers Apple, HP, Dell, and other PC makers, as well as the consumer electronics industry. She's also one of the hosts of CNET News' Daily Podcast. In her non-work life, she's a history geek, a loyal Dodgers fan, and a mac-and-cheese connoisseur. E-mail Erica.
Recent posts from Cutting Edge
Coming soon: Recyclable mannequin robots
DARPA's latest challenge: Locate these 10 balloons
Space station fliers land safely in Kazakhstan
Man loses job after searching too hard for aliens
Inside CERN with a collider scientist
CERN's collider sets proton speed record
Building circuits, code, community at Noisebridge hacker space
Shuttle Atlantis glides home after station visit
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by benjwah June 23, 2009 1:20 AM PDT
I can't believe the Atari Jaguar is second. That thing's 64-bit, it should be first.
Reply to this comment
by Thranx June 23, 2009 11:16 AM PDT
Nice.
by rwm72 June 23, 2009 2:59 AM PDT
Is the roadrunner the one that uses loads of playstation 3 cell processors? And controls the US nuclear missile system? I can't remember, excuse my ignorance.
Reply to this comment
by t3po7re54 June 23, 2009 5:41 AM PDT
Folding at Home is supposedly 6 times faster than the Road Runner
Reply to this comment
by thy1138 June 23, 2009 5:42 AM PDT
Ftom the minds of IBM - itty bitty minds. In a hollow sphere underground an explosion cannot be heard in "space" at least that's what the British showed in the west of England.
Reply to this comment
by Been_there_Saw_it_before June 23, 2009 1:27 PM PDT
You are right, to a point. A few nanoseconds after the explosion in the vacuum, the walls of the vacuum container will be heated by the released energy and will vaporize, said vapor thus filling the vacuum and causing a rather large bang. I do not want to be anywhere near it.
by OlsonBW June 23, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
It would have been nice to know what CPUs/GPUs are in each of these systems.
Reply to this comment
by deanbvfx June 23, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
IIRC IBM Roadrunner uses something like 12,000 Cell processors (like those found in the PS3) and 6,000 AMD processors (dunno what chip), as for GPU's I didn't think supercomputers would use them, I know GPGPU can crunch numbers blindingly fast, but CPU's (and SPU's in Roadrunners case) are much more flexible.
by CorwinB June 23, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
Unless something has changed, 7 of the top 10 including Roadrunner use AMD chips in combination with other specialty processors like the ones from PS3. You have me curios myself. I'll do some more digging.
by michealsmit October 12, 2009 10:31 PM PDT
Thanks for sharing this post. This is a very helpful and informative material. Good post and keep it up. Websites are always helpful in one way or the other, that?s cool stuff, anyways, [url=http://www.microsoft-certificate.com ]microsoft exam[/url] a good way to get started to renovate your dreams into the world of reality.
Thanks
Micheal,
by CorwinB June 23, 2009 2:37 PM PDT
Folding at Home uses GPUs. I actually found out about it because their aplication came on the driver disk of my 4870. Honestly though it really does depend on the work the supercomputer is doing.
Reply to this comment
by pianoman6954 July 18, 2009 1:45 PM PDT
Folding@Home uses GPUs and CPUs. It depends on GPU based processing for smaller floating point numbers and CPUs for the very large ones. GPUs make great folding at home devices because they can do necessary smaller calculations with a decent degree of accurracy very quickly and spanned across many physical simple processors. Processor based calculations use the FPU because of its huge register and it;s floating point accuracy.
by Crush1111 July 20, 2009 6:29 AM PDT
there is a very good ap article on road runner about Tom Watson and the British Open. So why is there a picture accompanying the article with Tiger Woods? Tom is a legend and deserves a lot of respect. Tiger had nothing to do with Tom's accomplishments. Shame on the AP article and Road Runner.
Reply to this comment
by michealsmit October 12, 2009 10:28 PM PDT
Thanks for sharing this post. This is a very helpful and informative material. Good post and keep it up. Websites are always helpful in one way or the other, that?s cool stuff, anyways, <a href="http://www.creditcardscities.com">credit card</a> a good way to get started to renovate your dreams into the world of reality.
Thanks
Micheal,
Reply to this comment
by michealsmit October 12, 2009 10:30 PM PDT
Thanks for sharing this post. This is a very helpful and informative material. Good post and keep it up. Websites are always helpful in one way or the other, that?s cool stuff, anyways, <a href="http://www.creditcardscities.com">credit card</a> a good way to get started to renovate your dreams into the world of reality.
Thanks
Micheal,
Reply to this comment
by michealsmit October 12, 2009 10:32 PM PDT
http://www.creditcardscities.com
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Cutting Edge

Keep up-to-date on cutting-edge research and what's new in a wide range of areas from robotics, space ventures and general science to automobile design and solar energy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Cutting Edge topics

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right