• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
July 18, 2008 7:16 AM PDT

SolarCity provides SF power below grid price

by Hanna Sistek
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 6 comments
Share

If you are a San Francisco resident considering solar panels, now is the time for action, says Lyndon Rive, CEO of SolarCity, a start-up that leases panels to homeowners.

Since the city solar-incentive program came into effect in July, it has become financially viable for even small energy consumers to install solar-power systems.

(Credit: SolarCity)

The San Francisco incentive covers between $3,000 to $6,000 for homeowners to install solar panels, as well as $10,000 for businesses and nonprofits, and $30,000 for nonprofit affordable housing. The program runs for a decade.

This initiative, together with a state rebate program of $1.90 per installed watt and the 30 percent federal investment tax credit (ITC) for solar energy, adds up to be a good deal, even for the city's smaller households.

Most energy customers in San Francisco pay an electricity rate that depends on how much power they use--the higher the usage, the steeper the bill, according to Rive. The rates vary from 12 cents per kilowatt-hour to 36 cents per kilowatt-hour.

Most of SolarCity's customers have paid 23 cents to 31 cents per kilowatt-hour for the electricity, prior to going solar. But with the addition of the city incentive program, even consumers paying 12 cents per kilowatt-hour today can reduce their electricity bill by installing solar cells, Rive claims.

"For as low as $25 per month, you can get a 2.4-kilowatt capacity system," he said.

Doing the math
Chris Clark, a resident of the Inner Sunset, a foggy neighborhood in San Francisco, is just finalizing his leasing deal with SolarCity. "It's going to reduce our bill significantly with the city rebate, probably 40 percent," he said. The roughly $120 that Clark currently pays for electricity per month is predicted to fall to about $70 per month when his system gets installed in August.

John Stubblebine in Cupertino, Calif., had SolarCity panels installed on his roof a month ago. He chose to pay for 8 percent of the $35,000, 6-kilowatt solar panel system up front.

"You can choose to pay zero, 8, or 16 percent of the system. Since I chose to put in a slightly more expensive system, there would be a slightly higher rate without a down payment," he said.

Stubblebine cut his monthly electricity bill from $158 to $116. But he also noted that he still needs to pay a residual bill to Pacific Gas and Electric for meter readings. And his electricity rates have changed from a set rate to being demand-based, with a midday peak price.

"You settle your bill with PG&E by the end of the year. If you've used more electricity than you produced, you pay all that. If you've used less, you don't get money back," he explained.

Stubblebine likes the monitoring program included in the lease with SolarCity, providing service for the initial 15 years for which customers sign up. Thereafter, customers can choose whether they want to renew the lease, buy the system, upgrade it, or take it off the roof.

SolarCity, which started operations in earnest in 2007, has grown from two employees to nearly 300, and it hopes to at least double its $30 million revenue this year. Initially, the company started out by cutting installation costs by 20 percent to 30 percent by persuading communities to do aggregated purchases of solar systems.

"But the largest barrier to adoption was the up-front cost. Even $20,000 was difficult," Rive concluded.

So he started a solar-leasing program, similar to the power purchase agreements that have become popular with larger corporations. SolarCity has expanded to Arizona and Oregon, with plans for the East Coast in 2009.

Competitors include Bay Area start-up Sun Run, Clean Power Finance and GroSolar.

Rive argues that now is a good time to go solar, since the federal ITC incentive will expire by the end of 2008, unless renewed by Congress. And the city incentive program has a limited pot of $3 million, only enough to cover 500 to 1,000 households.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Coke eyes climate-friendlier vending machines
California gives green light for space-based solar
Panasonic to invest $1 billion in green tech
Google Earth peers into California's eco-future
SmartSynch offers universal router for smart grids
New York eyes offshore wind farms on Great Lakes
Mazda, Think, EnerDel partner on electric rentals
Chevy Volt to cruise into California next year
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Seaspray0 July 18, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
I love the idea! I wish them luck. Nice story.
Reply to this comment
by side241 July 20, 2008 1:43 PM PDT
Its a stupid idea. Solar City and most of the other leases for solar simply redirects the consumers dollars from the utility to the solar company. If you do a side by side comparrison of leasing vs purchase, buying solar will be cheaper, with less down payment, less monthly cost for electricity, and eventually the loan is paid off and your electricity is free! With Solar City, after a 15 yr lease, you can renew the lease, guaranteeing a payment forever. A lease is dumb. OWN your electricity, don't RENT it!
Reply to this comment
by rodtod August 14, 2008 7:38 PM PDT
Where'd you get that idea? SolarCity's lease is CHEAPER in the long run than buying upfront, because with the lease they apply the commercial grade 30% rebate, instead of merely a $2000 rebate that you'd get buying upfront. And after 15 years, the panels are yours. Your payments are over, and the panels are yours to keep. Do some research side241.
by rdbarahona July 20, 2008 7:39 PM PDT
SolarCity's leasing is truly innovative and has done much to change the landscape for solar. We're trying to do the same with our community-based solar purchasing initiative called 1 Block Off the Grid ( http://www.1bog.org ). By pooling hundreds of residents together we can leverage the power of the community to drive cost down further.
Reply to this comment
by rodtod August 14, 2008 7:39 PM PDT
You're in charge of 1bog.org!? My congratulations to you and your fine effort. Keep it up!
by ronwinton February 21, 2009 4:17 PM PST
Rodtop you need to do your research. First of all there is no such thing as a 30% commercial grade rebate, it's a tax credit. Second becuause the system is being installed on a residence, the tax credit has a cap of $2,000.00 (as of the date of your post) which goes into Solar City's pocket not the homeowners, because of their higher system prices. Third after 15 years of making all those lease payments the system is not "yours" because you still have to pay the fair market value for the system in order to own it at the end of the lease. That's the whole idea behind a lease, you don't own the system, the leasing company does. It's just like leasing a car. Fourth there are dealers all over the Internet that offer top of the line, brand name systems at prices that are far lower for single system purchases than Solar City's multiple block off the grid prices. Shop around instead of falling for solar city's hype. I bet none of you can even tell me what brand of products solar city sells ? I wonder why ?
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right