June 20, 2008 8:46 AM PDT

Joint venture to use coal emissions to grow algae for biofuels

Algae's clout as a fuel feedstock seems to grow every day.

Inventure Chemical and Seambiotic announced this week a joint venture to create biofuels from algae fed by a coal-fired power plant.

An open pond for growing algae in Israel.

(Credit: Seambiotic)

Based in Seattle, Inventure Chemical has a process for converting algae to either biodiesel, ethanol, or specialty chemicals. Seambiotic, based in Tel Aviv, Israel, has developed an open-pond algae farming system that it is now testing in Israel.

The joint venture will grow algae using flue gas emissions from a power plant and use the resulting liquid fuel to power its operations or sell it.

In related news, the Algal Biomass Organization (ABO) said Thursday that three airlines have joined the industry group.

The airlines--Air New Zealand, Continental, and Virgin Atlantic Airways--join biofuel technology developer UOP and existing member Boeing, which co-chairs the ABO.

There are a growing number of algae-to-energy ventures and projects. The advantage that algae has over other feedstocks is that farms won't compete for existing crop land and yields can be higher.

Still, the technology remains experimental and in the development phase.

One of the first companies to enter the algae business, GreenFuel Technologies, this week said that it has signed a deal for a large project in Europe and has a few more in the U.S. that it hopes to sign in the coming weeks.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Democrats find 'green' political convention tough to enforce
GE reshapes the future of wind power
Nanosolar raises $300 million for thin-film solar
Compressed-air storage coming to wind power
Video: Hydrogen Road Tour revs its engines
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 11 comments
by fokkwp June 20, 2008 3:14 PM PDT
"The advantage that algae has over other feedstocks is that farms won't compete for existing crop land and yields can be higher." Not always true! Yes, very true for this fabulous project, harvesting CO2 and sunlight to make fuel - great way to reverse global warming. But other algae projects don't use sunlight at all nor CO2 - they use sugar - which may come from waste materials, but also may turn out to be cost-effective using sugar cane and corn, which is right back to the usual biofuels problem of using food crops or cutting down rainforests to replant with biomass.
Reply to this comment View reply
by prabhatb June 21, 2008 3:07 AM PDT
fokkwp, don't screw it up, you don't know ****. **** off
Reply to this comment
by greeny73 June 21, 2008 4:10 AM PDT
Seems that algae is in the news a lot these days. Just last week Boeing was throwing their considerable weight behind developing the technology - see more at www.cutyourfootprint.com
But I would like to know why the emphasis on algae for jet fuels? surely if they can power a plane than they could power a car too?
Reply to this comment View reply
by CooperSWorks June 22, 2008 5:47 PM PDT
greeny73 - look at it the other way around. Sure, it can power a car - and no doubt will (so I agree whole heartedly with you). There are energy sources that are and will be available for cars, however, that are not viable for airplanes . . . And hence Boeing's interest. I don't think we'll see hydrogen as a storage source for airplanes - ever. Electric is monumentally unlikely etc. etc. Fundamentally, airplanes need fuel that has a very high enery to weight ratio and that brings us back to oil based fuel.
Reply to this comment
by rwk9 June 23, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
fokkwp's comment is plain old wrong. I think he's confused algal fuels with alcohol. It's bad that those who know the least, seem to shout alarm the loudest.

It's no surprise that coal effluents are being used to feed algae farms. Burning coal produces massive amounts of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. These are what (along with water, and a handful of nutrients) algae live off of. But what is interesting is that they are growing algae in an environment open to the air. Not only does this let more coal effluent escape, it's also risky because algal species other than the most desired ones can take over the tank. But if your desire is primarily to cut coal emissions and not to create biofuels, this is certainly the cheaper way to go. I am sure they know what they're doing.
Reply to this comment
by Burnelli Support Group July 12, 2008 7:41 PM PDT
NO CORN - 60 gal an acre
NO SOY - 100 gal an acre?
And forget the Sugar additive for the dark production.
What-ever! Equals higher food prices and starvation.

The only great source of bio fuel is through Valcent Products in Texas. They grow algae in a vertical, plastic, closed system that can attain 100,000 gallons of bio fuel per acre and uses only 5% of the water of other open systems. Also, who eats algae as a staple food? Go here and check out the Vertigro video. http://www.valcent.net/s/Home.asp

Using food sources to make fuel is insane when there is an alternative that can create enough fuel to power America?s auto needs using only 1/10th of the state of New Mexico?s arid, empty land.
Reply to this comment
by Burnelli Support Group July 12, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
NO CORN - 60 gal an acre
NO SOY - 100 gal an acre?
And forget the sugar additive for the dark production.
What-ever! Equals higher food prices and starvation.

The only great source of bio fuel is through Valcent Products in Texas. They grow algae in a vertical, plastic, closed system that can attain 100,000 gallons of bio fuel per acre and uses only 5% of the water of other open systems. Also, who eats algae as a staple food? Go here and check out the Vertigro video. http://www.valcent.net/s/Home.asp

Using food sources to make fuel is insane when there is an alternative that can create enough fuel to power America?s auto needs using only 1/10th of the state of New Mexico?s arid, empty land.
Reply to this comment
by Burnelli Support Group July 12, 2008 7:43 PM PDT
NO CORN - 60 gal an acre
NO SOY - 100 gal an acre?
And forget the sugar additive for the dark production.
What-ever! Equals higher food prices and starvation.

The only great source of bio fuel is through Valcent Products in Texas. They grow algae in a vertical, plastic, closed system that can attain 100,000 gallons of bio fuel per acre and uses only 5% of the water of other open systems. Also, who eats algae as a staple food? Go here and check out the Vertigro video. http://www.valcent.net/s/Home.asp

Using food sources to make fuel is insane when there is an alternative that can create enough fuel to power America?s auto needs using only 1/10th of the state of New Mexico?s arid, empty land.
Reply to this comment
by bjmchugh July 28, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
The Valcent presentation sounds good, but when he refers to a closed system that sequesters carbon dioxide, loses water to evaporation, is subject to contamination by other algae species, and generates an amazing amount of lipids, it is not a closed system to which he refers.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right