• On ZDNet: Why I Will never buy a Mac
June 19, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

Trash-fed generator deployed in Iraq

by Martin LaMonica

Saving on fuel isn't a question of conservation for the military. It's about saving lives.

The U.S. Army is testing two prototype generators in Iraq that run on garbage, rather than diesel fuel.

The Tactical Garbage to Energy Refinery (TGER, pronounced "tiger"), was co-developed with Purdue University and deployed in May at Victory Base camp in Baghdad, where it will be tested until August.

A waste-to-energy generator being tested by the U.S. military in Iraq.

(Credit: U.S. Army)

The purpose of the unit is to cut down on the amount of diesel fuel used and to cut down on the amount of garbage that camps generate, which are both security risks.

"Those convoys that carry fuel are also known as targets," said James Valdes, scientific adviser for biotechnology at the U.S. Army Research, Development & Engineering Command. "Officers say 'We don't calculate the cost of fuel in dollars, we calculate it in blood.'"

Handling garbage is a logistical challenge, too, because the Army hires contractors who need to be followed.

Right now, the Army's trash goes up in smoke by burning it. The problem with incinerators, though, is that they require a lot of energy to run and many people to operate it.

TGER uses a variety of technologies to fuel a standard 60-kilowatt electrical generator.

People put trash into a chute and then the wet waste--like food slop--is separated from the rest. The cardboard, plastic, and other dry trash are crushed and pelletized.

Those pellets are then put into a gasifier, which heats them until they turn into synthetic gas--fuel for the generator.

Developers found that the relatively low-grade fuel from the trash over-heated the generators and maxed output at about 40 kilowatts.

So it created a system to convert the sugar-rich wet wastes (apparently, U.S. soldiers drink a good amount of Kool-Aid) into a form of ethanol. The wet waste is treated with enzymes and then fermented into hydrous ethanol--a mix of 85 percent pure ethanol and water, Valdes explained.

That ethanol is blended in with the synthetic gas, which boosts the generator's output to 55 kilowatts.

Starting up the contraption takes 6 hours and still requires 5 percent of the diesel the generator usually uses, or about 1 gallon per hour.

Compared to an incinerator, TGER is far more efficient at converting garbage to usable energy, said Valdes, who also said it runs at 90 percent efficiency. And it significantly cuts down on the amount of garbage that needs to be trucked around.

"Ultimately, what we would like to do is have a clean-sheet design so that you could automate it more. So you literally put trash in one end and electricity comes out the other," Valdes said.

If the TGER units work well in the harsh Baghdad conditions, he envisions the generator will be deployed in smaller camps, where the higher percentage of food waste can improve efficiency.

Valdes said the portable generator could also be used in disaster-relief situations where there is a lot of trash and the need for generators. The U.S. Navy has shown interest in the unit as well.

Trash, as it turns out, is an attractive feedstock. There are several commercial companies developing technologies that use wastes as fuel.

Cellulosic ethanol companies convert agricultural or forestry residues into ethanol, while portable generators use similar feedstock, such as wood chips, to make electricity.

A number of companies are also trying to convert municipal solid waste into ethanol using a range of processes.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Fisker's good Karma
Cleantech Group: Green investing sees uptick
Greenpeace guide frowns on HP, still loves Nokia
U.S. government maps solar energy future
Yahoo redesigns data center, ditches carbon offsets
New solar airplane unveiled in Switzerland
How green are you? Ecobot knows...
The greening of tech packaging
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by 42istheanswer June 19, 2008 5:03 AM PDT
I think it's great that we are innovating in Iraq. I wonder if we'll use that technology in the US or will we continue to use 100 year old technology here.
Reply to this comment
by Commander_Spock June 19, 2008 8:50 AM PDT
Re: "I think it's great that we are innovating in Iraq. I wonder if we'll use that technology in the US or will we continue to use 100 year old technology here..." Have ya ever heard of the River Bank State Park located in New York City! Then again, it might depend on whether you were referring to "human-waste" also!
by Whatsizface June 19, 2008 6:43 AM PDT
This is the kind of technology that should be used in North America since we produce a LOT of garbage, but I can't wait to hear the environmentalcases go after the military for polluting the air in Iraq (or whatever protest they can dream up).

But I'm sure they'll protest from a distance ;)
Reply to this comment
by galeso June 19, 2008 8:27 AM PDT
Not in my backyard, the process creates carcinogens. This is already being done in Chicago thanks to Mayor Daley & the Democratic Machine. They will never miss the few poor black voters from the neighborhood who they kill every year from respiratory illnesses. :-(
Reply to this comment
by skrubol June 19, 2008 9:03 AM PDT
Kinda like Mr. Fusion! (except not at all.)
I guess for somewhere with a major garbage problem and where electricity is expensive this probably makes a lot of sense. Using this stateside I'm sure these would never pay for themselves.
Reply to this comment
by Commander_Spock June 19, 2008 11:00 AM PDT
Re: "Developers found that the relatively low-grade fuel from the trash over-heated the generators and maxed output at about 40 kilowatts..." Are we considering yet the usage of "REFRACTORY GRADE BAUXITE" linings to keep the heat in where it must be kept; and, for keeping the outside cool like it is the case in the STEEL MAKING FURNACE!
Reply to this comment
by outpostprime June 22, 2008 7:06 AM PDT
Have to remember that this has to be portable. It's not permanent and has to be moved. If you add that much isolation the machine will weigh too much.
In case of attack where a retreat is required, they'll have to leave it. If they leave it, then the enemy will use it to their advantage. Simple as that.
Now if it were permanent then it wouldn't matter. As a matter of fact it would be better as the enemy wouldn't even target it. Damn thing would be like shooting a hill with a rock and expecting it to explode.
by Commander_Spock June 19, 2008 11:48 AM PDT
Re: "Those convoys that carry fuel are also known as targets," said James Valdes, scientific adviser for biotechnology at the U.S. Army Research, Development & Engineering Command. "Officers say 'We don't calculate the cost of fuel in dollars, we calculate it in blood.'" So, when are the "i-Robots" going to be deployed; "RECOVERY" ONES and all? Bada Bling - Missions Without End! "Behold I Will Be With You Until The End"!
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right