June 17, 2008 11:41 AM PDT

Algae-to-energy company GreenFuel replaces CEO

GreenFuel Technologies, a closely watched algae start-up, has hired a new CEO to place interim CEO Bob Metcalfe.

Simon Upfill-Brown will join the company in mid-July from Haltermann Custom Processing, where he was CEO of the chemical manufacturing firm. He was general manager of Haltermann Dow after Dow Chemical bought the company in 2001 until it was spun out this year as a separate company.

Incoming GreenFuel Technologies CEO Simon Upfill-Brown.

(Credit: GreenFuel Technologies)

In a statement, Upfill-Brown said "algae has come of age."

"By developing and scaling our algae farming technologies, we aim to play a huge role in solving the world's energy problems: mitigating CO2 emissions and producing renewable fuels, while adding to feed and food supplies rather than reducing them," he said.

GreenFuel Technologies is one of the first in a wave of companies trying to commercialize algae-based fuel.

It has bioreactors that use large amounts of carbon dioxide--from a power plant or other large emitter--and sunlight to grow algae. The algae is then harvested and then turned into liquid fuel, like biodiesel, or burned for electricity.

The company ran into troubles last year when its pilot test at utility Arizona Public Service did not produce fuel as cost-effectively as anticipated.

It trimmed down its staff and replaced its CEO, putting Ethernet co-inventor Metcalfe--now a partner at venture capital firm Polaris Ventures--in as interim CEO.

Last month, the company said it completed a C round of venture funding and has landed an undisclosed customer for its algae farming technology.

In an interview, Metcalfe said that GreenFuel has a few projects in the works, some of which could be announced in a few weeks.

"We are in project mode now. These are development and scaling projects with partners who want to have an algae farm next to a power plant, a cement plant, or an ethanol plant," he said.

One project in Europe is already under way, although its partner does not want it to be disclosed publicly yet.

One in Phoenix with Arizona Public Service would be much bigger and more serious than its initial demonstration facility, he said.

In addition, GreenFuel Technologies has developed a completely new design for its bioreactors that breaks with the glass tubes and plastic bags used in its tests, Metcalfe said.

Instead, the latest product resembles a green house. But because it's designed to be filled with flue gasses, it's closed off from people.

"We're hoping to quadruple the productivity per square meter," he said, adding that the glass tube design was too expensive and that harvesting algae from the second-generation bioreactor would be more automated.

Finally, Metcalfe made clear that biodiesel is not necessarily the end product of the company's algae farming technology.

Instead, its customers will be able to sell their algae for "feed, food, or fuel," he said.

Updated at 3:25 p.m. PDT following interview with Bob Metcalfe.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Green news harvest: Fuel-cell gadget charger, liquor-powered iPod
Solazyme targets algae fuel in three years
Trilliant: Smart grid meets mesh networks
Mayor Bloomberg floats New York City wind plan
Google digs into wallet for geothermal energy
by fokkwp June 17, 2008 12:40 PM PDT
It is absolute bullsh*t that a company doing this kind of innovative work that may have huge implications for global warming not far down the road, should be faced with the need to be "cost-effective" and be at the mercy of venture capitalists, while big oil has 3 trillion US tax dollars spent on preserving cheap access to Middle East oil fields for it; while nuclear plants are given tens of billions of free tax-paid loan guarantees. All from our tax moneys. And for these guys to need an immeasurably small pittance to jumpstart a real solution they are expected to be "cost effective". If we had the least common sense as a nation we would be throwing as many hundreds of billions at these startups as they could effectively absorb, so that within 15 years we'd be selling energy to both China and Russia as they fight each other over the last of the oil reserves, something we would no longer need.

Don't confuse these guys with the companies that convert sugar (biomass) instead of sunlight and CO2 to fuel via algae. That kind of biomass conversion is likely to cause more problems than it solves, including global warming.
Reply to this comment
by swampman123 June 17, 2008 2:24 PM PDT
You may want to check out "Khosla Ventures Top 5 Keys To Green" a pretty interesting interview with Ford Tamer, a Partner at Khosla Ventures, the leading venture capital firm investing in green technology companies. Ford talks about Khosla's 5 cultural keys to investing in and building a successful green technology company. One of the main topics of the interview talks about building a leadership team.

http://www.selkerlead.net/blog/index.php/selker-leadership/khosla-ventures-top-5-keys-to-green/
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About Green Tech

  • Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On MovieTome: SEX AND THE CITY clips are here!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites