• On BNET: 3 worst things about the iPhone 3G S
May 10, 2008 3:06 PM PDT

Fisker Auto flashes look at sporty electric sedan

by Martin LaMonica

Fisker Automotive took a prototype of its planned $80,000 electric sedan for a spin on a track in California, giving gawkers the first first look of the luxury sedan in action.

The photos, which were thought to be "spy photos," were actually taken by the company's PR firm and distributed to the media, according to published reports.

The Fisker Karma luxury electric sedan. Click on the image to see photos of a prototype on a test track.

(Credit: Fisker Automotive)

In any case, the photos show the Karma, a plug-in hybrid sedan that Fisker says it will deliver in the fourth quarter this year, manufacturing 15,000 a year.

Fisker is now embroiled in a legal suit with its rival Tesla Motors, another luxury electric car maker. Tesla has accused Fisker of stealing car designs and trade secrets. CEO Henrik Fisker called the suit "nonsense."

Tesla opened up its first showroom earlier this month and is taking orders for its two-door Roadster. It plans to make an electric luxury sedan, called the Whitestar, as well.

Fisker first unveiled the Karma at the North American International Auto Show in January. Click here for a video of the Karma at the Auto Show.

The car is being designed to go 50 miles on its batteries before recharging. An on-board generator, which charges the battery, runs on a liquid fuel.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Fisker's good Karma
Cleantech Group: Green investing sees uptick
Greenpeace guide frowns on HP, still loves Nokia
U.S. government maps solar energy future
Yahoo redesigns data center, ditches carbon offsets
New solar airplane unveiled in Switzerland
How green are you? Ecobot knows...
The greening of tech packaging
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by jagreen78 May 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
GREAT!!! We can make a sports car that runs on electric but can't make a damn vehicle for the common man in this country.
Reply to this comment
by JohnnyInTheBucket November 21, 2008 10:18 AM PST
Exactly!! More stats...the Tesla....0-60 in 4 secs., 240 miles per charge, over 100mph top speed. 5 yr old company can produce vehicles with these specs, yet GM, Ford, and Chrysler can't come up with even 1/3 of these capacities. It's plain to see that they didn't see the opportunity(or care about it), and are now kicking and screaming all the way to bankruptcy court now while Toyota is projecting a $5 billion dollar profit for having the foresight to mass market alternative fuel vehicles (Prius) here in the US.

My vote...let the big 3 go under. Anyone who works for them should be ashamed. These companies have triple-handedly sucked the life out of this country, and are currently throwing that dependence in our faces!!! Maybe the complete downfall of the auto industry, as it currently exists in this country, would be just the wake-up call people need to get motivated into doing the right thing!

While I'm on this soapbox, another thing I'd like to mention is that these manufacturers have been allowed to dictate the progress (or lack therof) regarding efficiency of current fuel consumption. We had cars in the early 1900's that were providing well over 25 mpg. Now, 80+ years later, this is still considered a high-mileage vehicle. Give me a freakin' break. go ahead and click on the Chevy "Gas-friendly to gas free" links all over this page. The best mileage vehicle is 37 mpg.. Not only is this an insult to our intelligence, but it's pretty obvious that there are other forces holding this technology back.

What gives??....does anyone else here smell the stink of energy cartel money???? US automakers were making electric cars in the early 1900's. OK, so they didn't go that fast and were a pain to keep charged. One would think that in the span of 80+ years of technology advances, that oil products as a main source of transportation fuel should have been replaced by the early 1990's. It's a known fact that we could have already converted almost completely over to CNG by now. Not only is it over 100% more efficient to burn as a fuel, but it produces MUCH less emissions, we wouldn't have to re-tool factories to build them, we have abundant supplies of the fuel, and we have an infrastructure in place for re-fueling.

To close, I only have one more thing to say. Regarding the bail-out loan plans for the big 3 automakers. Forget them. Give the 25 billion to Tesla, Fisker, Aptera, and other green auto companies that are actually proving that technology has the right answers TODAY! That way, the cost of producing their vehicles could be brought down to a more manageable number. In turn, making it more affordable for the consumer.
advertisement
Click Here

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right