Three-wheel vehicles eligible for federal funds
Worth promoting with federal dollars?
(Credit: Aptera)Congress has approved a measure that will allow makers of three-wheel cars to receive funding for fuel-efficient auto technologies, according to published reports.
The bill, which still needs to be signed into law, could be a boost to companies developing alternative car designs, notably Aptera Motors and Elio Motors. Both companies have argued that their three-wheel cars deserve federal funding meant to promote more efficient vehicles.
The legislation, passed late last week, would overturn an Energy Department rule that limited funding to four-wheel vehicles meeting emissions and fuel-economy benchmarks, Automotive News reported on Friday. The new guidelines will now allow vehicles that get an average of at least 75 miles per gallon and can carry at least two adults, according to the report.
Vista, Calif.-based Aptera plans in the middle of next year to start producing its 2e, a three-wheel electric vehicle that it says will be able to go at least 100 miles on its battery charge.
Elio, based in Tempe, Ariz., is developing a narrow, three-wheel gasoline car it says gets more than 70 miles per gallon. It intends to sell the vehicle for less than $7,500.
General Motors, which is applying for DOE funds to promote electric vehicle production, has opposed changes in the rules in the past, Automotive News said.
Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin. 






A number of mpg is missing.
In the second to last para you say: "three-wheel gasoline car which gets over miles per gallon."
How many MPG??
oh...and you can reserve one apparently!
http://www.aptera.com//reservations.php
Granted, it only goes 40 mph max and is for in town use only, but still...
Aptera while only a 2-seater vehicle, have plenty of cargo spaces, including more than 15 bags of groceries, and can accomodate a couple of full sized surf boards along with the other wet suit and gears, golf caddies, etc.
To put in perspective, the Aptera is applying for a $75M LOAN for mass producing the car and not $BILLIONS bail-out like GM, that has been opposing such amendment. With more than 4,000 committed-to-buy orders, this company and others like it, have way better prospects than GM, and it is what GM fears the most, and so any chance that it can deny progress of such companies, GM will try.
Front wheel drive, weight low down and near the front (i.e., very hard to roll and pressing down on the drive/primary braking wheels), maneuverable, low inertia, etc. What's wrong? The only negative I can see is that the rear wheel won't drive through the wheel ruts after a snow -- but then again, its main job is just to prop the rear end up.
To put in perspective, the Aptera is applying for a $75M LOAN for mass producing the car. A loan that will have a big chance to be repaid considering that there are more than 4,000 committed-to-buy orders.
Compare this to the multi-billion dollar bail-out money that General Motors have been squeezed out from the taxpayers. Will the billion dollars be ever repaid by GM? And how is it that GM is lobbying so hard so as the few million dollar loans are denied of Aptera? The only reason I can come up with is that they truly fear the new breeds of vehicle manufacturers that will become much more successful than they will be in this new landscape.
Aptera est, price $27K, GM-Volt $47K. So which would be more affordable as a commuting vehicle?
My next vehicle will definitely plug in, and I hope it's an Aptera.
http://blog.autospeed.com/2007/11/13/three-wheel-cars/
Basic summary: that's true for "delta" trikes (one wheel forward, two in back), but not for "tadpole" trikes (two wheels forward, one in back), which are just as stable as four wheelers, but have a faster yaw (turning) response due to a lower moment of inertia. Like four wheelers, tadpoles are naturally prone to understeer; this is unlike deltas, which are naturally prone to oversteer.
Like all cars that haven't been released, it has no NTSB crash safety rating yet. What's the point of crash testing it before it's finalized? Now, while they're not legally required to crash test it, one of the principles Aptera has strongly adhered to since day one is that they will exceed car safety standards -- including physical crash testing. In fact, the vehicle was designed from the beginning with virtual crash testing, using the same software that BMW uses.
http://green.autoblog.com/2009/05/20/video-jay-leno-drives-loves-the-aptera/
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/05/jay-leno-garage-aptera-2e-electric-video.php
http://blogs.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1020891_late-night-hosts-love-evs-part-ii-jay-leno-and-the-aptera-2e
And Robin Williams has also placed a deposit for the Aptera...
- by DucTrip9 October 21, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
- The Elio Motors vehicle is very real and mpg figures are EPA certified and documented.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(22 Comments)Please see the initial site http://eliomotors.com/
At the potential volumes, due to price and the mpg , this is the most significant vehicle since the Model T, to our country's environment and economy .