• On mySimon: French Sole Season Leather Flats
October 13, 2009 4:00 AM PDT

Barn raisings weatherize homes to cut energy bills

by Martin LaMonica
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments

You could call us the "caulk gun militia."

Last month, I joined about 40 other volunteers, armed to the teeth with materials to weatherize a two-family home. Despite the rain and a few errant squirts of insulating foam, we made the leaky New England home significantly more energy efficient, largely by sealing all manner of leaks.

We won't know the financial impact of our work until after the winter months, but it will undoubtedly lower the residents' heating and electricity bills in future years. Along the way, we learned a few things we could do at our own homes, met some people in the community, and felt good about volunteering our time.

A blower door measures how air tight a home is by measuring air flow at a given air pressure.

(Credit: Martin LaMonica/CNET)

Credit for the idea behind our barn raising goes to Cambridge, Mass.-based HEET, or Home Energy Efficiency Team, a volunteer group that has organized a number of these events over the past year. The goal isn't just to weatherize one building; it's to teach as well. After all, many people want to be a little more green in their personal lives--and who doesn't want to lower their utility bills?--but not everybody knows how.

The evidence is just anecdotal, but it seems that the practice is taking hold in a few other places. When I went to a training session this summer at a drafty Victorian in Cambridge, there were about 10 people from other towns and states looking to start their own local chapters.

Weatherizing homes won't solve all our energy and climate challenges. But while many folks are intent on high-tech (and high-priced) solutions to our energy problems, weatherization is a sensible, low-cost place to start. About 40 percent of the energy in the U.S. goes to commercial and residential buildings and investments in efficiency typically have the fastest payback. Weatherizing a home could cut energy use by as much as 30 percent, according to the Department of Energy, and many steps at are relatively inexpensive.

Even at an event devoted to the potential of solar power--the Solar Decathlon--U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu last week underscored how important energy efficiency is to the country's energy policy and people's pocketbooks. In every place they've lived, Chu said he and his wife have made a game of trying to cut energy bills in half from the previous owner.

Foam patrol
Well, our little barn raising effort probably won't cut the homeowners' bills in half. But for less than $500 in material, a good amount of planning, and a bit of sweat equity, we did pretty well. Every group can set up their own rules, but typically it's the homeowner who fronts the money for the materials--as well as donuts, coffee, and pizza. They're welcome to lend a hand as well.

Much of the work we did can be done by a weekend do-it-yourselfer. But your task can be greatly helped by a knowledgeable person or a professional. I always recommend people get an energy audit to help them form a home efficiency game plan. Many of them are free, sponsored by states or utilities, while others can cost about $500 for more extensive work (Go to EfficiencyFirst to find an auditor in your location.)

In our case, a local contractor donated the use of a blower door--a temporary door with a fan and monitor attached to it--to test the air leakage before and after our work. A blower door, which exaggerates the air flow through existing holes, helped locate a few big problems. For example, the frame around the basement door had a gap which was letting in a lot of outside air. The faster air flows up into your house from below, the faster the conditioned air--be it cool or hot--goes through roof.

Our group split up into different teams, focusing on different areas in the house. An electrical group, which was led by a professional electrician, installed compact florescent bulbs and covered up electrical outlets with foam barriers. In the basement, I co-led a team of people who insulated hot water pipes and the hot water heater. A bunch of people fanned out to caulk or foam the spots in the basement ceiling and windows where air seeps in from the outside.

In all the home's zones, we spotted and filled holes, going through many bottles of caulk and cans of expanding foam. The attic crew covered spots in the attic where air was creeping up, another crew caulked around windows in the living space, while another filled gaps in the basement windows and where the stone foundation meets the wood framing.

Before starting, those many little holes added up to a large area--the equivalent of about two sheets of printer paper. After the weatherizing, the air leakage in one unit was cut by almost 13 percent, which is a bit better than average, and the other by 24 percent, which everyone agreed was a very good result.

The two families living there were clearly very grateful. Homes are chosen pretty much by word of mouth. In this case, we worked with the local non-profit affordable housing organization which has made environmental sustainability part of their plans.

It's a journey
Although the bulk of the work was done by nonprofessionals, there's still a good amount of skill required, particularly in the diagnosis. Is there a bigger payoff in putting weatherstripping around the front door? Or should you focus on fixing that door that leads to the attic? Also, there can be many routes to fixing the same problem.

This is where energy contractors are supposed to help. But even before you hire somebody, I still think it's wise to read up on what's considered best practices in home weatherization. At the very least, the better educated you are, the more value you'll get from an audit by asking questions specific to your situation. You could start your own barn raising group if you got expert enough.

There's a wealth of information online, including the Department of Energy's EnergySavers.gov Web site. One book I'd recommend for the average consumer is Bruce Harley's "Cut your Energy Bills Now" but there are many others.

Of course, greening your home isn't just about plugging leaks--that's just the cheapest place to start. After that, there are a number of options--water-saving bathroom fixtures, better insulation, or more efficient heating and cooling. For big-ticket items, you can look at solar power or an efficient geothermal, or ground-source, heat pump. I've been trying to lower the energy load in my own home for years and I still consider it a work in progress so it's good to have a long-term plan.

The skills you learn can come in handy whenever you do home improvements like putting on an addition or new floor; those are opportunities to insulate or block air holes. Also, armed with the knowledge of how important air sealing is will keep contractors on their toes. In my experience, electricians and cable installers will blithely drill holes wherever it's convenient for them.

In the meantime, our local HEET group is looking for more. It's usually not simple to organize a group of volunteers to do something they've never tried before. The work itself is not what you'd call glamorous either. But having worked on a few barn raisings now, I'd say it's well worth the effort.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Smart grid potential gated by broadband
2012 Olympics showpiece: Big bubbles in the sky
Google hosts energy experts amid climate talks
Microturbine-powered hybrid supercar to debut in Los Angeles
Pedal-powered Christmas tree lights Copenhagen
Underground data center to help heat Helsinki
Science untarnished by 'Climategate,' U.N. says
U.S., China help climate talks, but tangles remain
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by rdupuy11 October 13, 2009 7:31 AM PDT
Did the weathering experts say anything about leaving your windows open? I don't know what good any of it will do, when you have a spouse that says the air is getting stale, and then just leaves the windows open all day.

:-) uh, ya someone has a spouse like that .
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 October 13, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
p.s. there is a reason some of it needs to be technical in nature. A lot of times people think, well, lets use the example of heating in the wintertime, they think if noone is in the building I can turn the heat down, save money on heating, and then say, turn the heat back on when its needed. But actually it takes a lot of energy to bring the building back up to temperature, you may save money by not turning down the heat at all vs. turning it down too much.

In larger buildings they have environmental systems that calculate, at least better than a human can typically do, just how much to turn down the heat, exactly when to do it, when to start the warmup, and how fast to do that, etc. So you see a moderate drop in temperature overnight, or on the weekends, whenever people are not expected to be in the building, and a moderate rewarming of the building, in anticipation of people arriving (the next morning, after the weekend, etc.)

Not that its ever going to be exactly right, but the technology can usually pay for itself, its a good idea.
I don't think its necessary to think in terms of limited amounts of money, and where to best spend it.

This is money otherwise spent on electricity bills, so of course its better spent on environmental systems...it doesn't limit the money for spending on other projects, it just comes from the energy bill savings.
Reply to this comment
by ittesi259 October 13, 2009 7:56 AM PDT
If you could cite some source on how not turning the heat down is beneficial I'd love to see it because I've done it both ways and the larger bills come from doing what you recommend.
by SmedleyShakes October 13, 2009 7:59 AM PDT
rdupuy11 - That is a common misconception. The reality, tested and proven, is that lowering the home temp and bringing it back up saves energy. See: http://bit.ly/o2OwP
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 October 13, 2009 11:44 AM PDT
The laws of thermodynamics make it quite clear that it can't use more energy to reheat a building than it would to keep it warm in the first place. Now, could it COST more? Well, it depends on the type of heat (electric, gas), how long it's off vs. on, etc. because that is more to do with peak rates or "over baseline charges" than anything else, where the cost of energy is increased, sometimes double or triple, at certain times or by a certain day in the month. If you are on electric heat, you may not want to turn the thermostat down at night only to have to use peak power in the morning to heat it up again...
by nrg.dude October 13, 2009 8:36 AM PDT
Back in the early 80s, I wrote the software for the blower door calculator used by a company called Energy Doctor in Austin. They had several franchisees fixing up homes and using Federal dollars to upgrade the A/C units in hot and humid Austin. Most saw a 40+% decrease in their energy bills. But when the Federal dollars dried up, the people stopped weatherizing. Too bad. Here it is 25 years later and we are having to relearn an already proven way to cut energy usage. Maybe HEET should go to Austin and collect the data on the homes that were weatherized back then. And when properly weatherized, it is much more efficient to turn off the heat or A/C then let it run at a lower/higher temp. when no one is home. It takes less than one hour to get back to normal compared to 9+ hours of offset usage. Big savings.
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 October 13, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
It may not be good for your belongings though. Daily temperature and humidity fluctuations for fabrics and woods are not the best thing in the world for them, not to mention home electronics. Also, photographs, framed artwork, books, etc. will all warp and decay faster from these practices...
by Joe Real October 13, 2009 4:25 PM PDT
One of the most neglected energy variable is the Radiative losses. In fact, the amount of radiative losses is directly proportional to the FOURTH power of absolute temperature. You can search for the Stefan-Boltzmann Law about calculating such losses.

Now take this in the context of heating. If you keep a house at higher temperature in a cold environmment, you are bound to have more radiative heat losses by virtue of higher black body temperature, than by keeping the house at lower temperature when you're away. And mind you, the radiative losses are a factor of fourth power of absolute temperature.

Take into the context of cooling, the walls of the houses are radiating back into the house. The cooler you maintain your temperature, the more net radiative heat will be absorbed. Thus turning off (or setting the thermostat higher) the AC while you're away would save you energy (electricity for the AC) too, rather than keeping the AC on all the time.

There is no escape about the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. Turning off the HVAC while you're away for extended period will save you utility bills than keeping them at comfortable level.
Reply to this comment
by batticdoor October 18, 2009 6:28 PM PDT
How To Reduce Your Energy Bills / Energy Conservation Begins at Home

Imagine leaving a window open all winter long -- the heat loss, cold drafts and wasted energy! If your home has a folding attic stair, a whole house fan or AC Return, a fireplace or a clothes dryer, that may be just what is occurring in your home every day.

These often overlooked sources of energy loss and air leakage can cause heat and AC to pour out and the outside air to rush in -- costing you higher energy bills.

But what can you do about the four largest ?holes? in your home -- the folding attic stair, the whole house fan or AC return, the fireplace, and the clothes dryer?

To learn more visit www.batticdoor.com

Mark D. Tyrol is a Professional Engineer specializing in cause and origin of construction defects. He developed several residential energy conservation products including an attic stair cover and an attic access door. Battic Door is the US distributor of the fireplace plug.
Reply to this comment
by uarent November 2, 2009 11:16 AM PST
Many energy efficiency upgrades that can be made on a home have a return on investment within five years. The first step in learning what upgrades should be made is the energy audit. To learn more about energy efficiency visit <a>www.austinauditors.com</a> and click the "get informed" tab.
Reply to this comment
by uarent November 2, 2009 11:17 AM PST
Many energy efficiency upgrades that can be made on a home have a return on investment within five years. The first step in learning what upgrades should be made is the energy audit. To learn more about energy efficiency visit www.austinauditors.com and click the "get informed" tab.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

Big marketing budget drives Moto Droid sales

Verizon and Motorola are spending big bucks--$100 million--on marketing the new smartphone, and it looks like it will pay off with 1 million devices sold by year's end.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right