• On MovieTome: First Look: Jessica Alba in 'Machete'!
July 27, 2009 9:04 AM PDT

Nissan unveils all-electric sedan prototype

by Martin LaMonica
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 44 comments

Nissan gave a glimpse of its plans to make an all-electric sedan that will go 100 miles on a charge and have a suite of online features to aid drivers.

The company on Monday showed off an electric car prototype, based on the Tiida mid-size sedan. It said that an all-electric production car with a unique design will be unveiled on August 2 at its Yokohama, Japan, headquarters and go on sale in 2010 in Japan and the U.S.

The electric sedan will connect to Nissan's data centers to provide drivers with information and support, according to the carmaker.

Nissan's EV prototype, an electric power train fitted onto a Tiida/Versa mid-size Versa sedan.

(Credit: Nissan)

The EV-IT system will display on a map how much driving range they have left and can calculate whether a car can make it to a pre-set destination. The system can point drivers to available charging stations within driving range.

The driver can also remotely view a battery's charge and turn on the air conditioner from a Web-connected computer or phone. Charging can be scheduled to take advantage of off-peak rates, too.

The car itself is built around Nissan's electric motor and a 24-kilowatt-hour battery pack which is placed under the car. With generative braking that charges the car during deceleration and braking, Nissan estimates that drivers can get 100 miles on a charge, although it notes that range depends on conditions and driving styles.

Although it lags in hybrids, Nissan has been one of the most aggressive in developing all-electric sedans. It is already testing the EV-02, which is based on the Nissan Cube chassis. It also has a partnership to work with Better Place, which provides consumers with charging points and access to battery-swapping stations in exchange for subscription plans.

Nissan has not announced prices, but a company representative told the Associated Press in Japan that the electric vehicle would be "competitive" with gasoline cars.

Because of the limitations on driving range and the high cost of batteries, other automakers including Toyota and General Motors have said they expect consumers will favor gasoline-electric cars.

Along with Tesla Motors, start-ups Coda Automotive and Detroit Electric are making all-electric cars which they say will have enough range for daily driving for many people.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Science untarnished by 'Climategate,' U.N. says
U.S., China help climate talks, but tangles remain
Looking under Nissan's Leaf
Utility energy storage no longer just giant batteries
California unveils draft cap-and-trade rules
DOE smart-grid trials fund utility-scale energy storage
Wave energy generator pumps power to Scotland
Norway opens world's first osmotic power plant
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (44 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by monkeyfun14 July 27, 2009 9:24 AM PDT
Why are all electric cars and hybrids so damn ugly.
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ July 27, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
I think Tesla looks cool. :?
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
The dirty secret is that if you plopped an efficient diesel into a Prius body, you'd get pretty damn good efficiency. A lot of the true hybrid model efficiencies come from aerodynamic shape and weight reduction that could be applied to ANY vehicle. Hard, tiny tires, underbody smoothing, funky aero shape, etc. Combine that with a display that helped you "drive smarter" to save diesel, and you'd easily get 40-50mpg in a Prius body with a normal diesel engine. With better performance.

The europeans know this, which is why most hybrids are sold in the USA to stupid Americans, with the government doing everything they could to keep diesels out of the market (by screwing with emissions requirements every time diesel cars met current standards).
by Renegade Knight July 27, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
@ikramerica--2008

Take that one step further and make that Prious a Diesel Hybrid and you would do far better than 40-50mpg.
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
No doubt. VW was testing a diesel hybrid golf last spring that did 60-70mpg, and that was only in a mildly optomized Golf chasis, not a funky looking Prius purpose built frame.

Problem is, diesel engines cost more to build than gas, and adding the hybrid drivetrain to the picture increases cost further. VW canceled plans to build that car because the consumer cost was too high, and because there is no market for hybrids outside of the USA. They are coming out with a less expensive to build, bizarre hybrid with a direct drive gas engine (no transmission), a plug in feature, but a really weird way of putting it all together that will only work as a city fleet vehicle, imho.

Now, if the US would subsidize diesel hybrids to the tune of $2000, they would be equal in cost to a gas hybrid to buy, and get 30-50% better mileage. They just started with a $1300 or so tax credit for the TDI, but without assurance that this is a permanent situation, VW would be dumb to build one. Why? Because the USA (actually CARB) has so many times pulled the rug out of German automaker diesels by lowering the SOx standard to purposely make them illegal (mainly to protect Japanese and American factories in the USA that were not offering idiesels, but you won't get anyone to admit that backdoor protectionism), that the Germans are rightfully wary of trusting our government ever again. Maybe when VW starts building a whole new, American market only model lineup built in the USA will they suddenly be in favor with politicians.
by martin1212 July 27, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
No market for hybrids outside the USA? The new Prius has been the bestselling car in Japan since its launch.
by martin1212 July 27, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
Re Diesel in Prius body. I think if you did that you would certainly get good highway mileage because that is where the aerodynamic shape and weight reduction of the Prius helps the most. However it would not really help city mileage. In that case the Prius is getting most of its benefit from regenerative braking. Easy test is to compare say a Jetta TDI vs a Prius. Highway mileage is not that different (41 vs 48), but in city driving the TDI is nowhere near (30 vs 51).
by krisztoforo July 27, 2009 2:00 PM PDT
Re: martin1212

I agree, the internal combustion engine (be it diesel or gas) in stop and go city traffic can not match batteries efficiency wise. That's another way hybrids get better milage in city traffic, diesel or gas engines do not run equally efficient in all rpm range, so the frequent change in rpm will result in decreased efficiency when comparing to the same engine revving at its sweet spot charging the batteries.
by jemiller0 July 27, 2009 3:57 PM PDT
Who wants a diesel when you can get an all electric for a price competitive with an internal combustion engine vehicle (if what Nissan claims is true)? Diesel may be better than gasoline, but, electric is still way better than diesel in terms of efficiency (See http://fueleconomy.gov/feg/evtech.shtml, 80% efficient for electric versus 20% for gasoline). If these vehicles really are cost competitive, I think they'll take off. Once the battery prices come down, these vehicles should be cheaper considering how much simpler they are.
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 5:38 PM PDT
Yes, but it's not just the aero tweaks (which start to help at 35mph), but the low rolling resistance (hard, unresponsive) tires and small contact patch that increase mileage in all conditions. And again, you'd also need to put in one of those cute displays that make getting better mileage a game like it is in a hybrid (I've driven enough of them to know that it helps you get better mileage to have positive feedback).

Of course, the rules of the game are different to some degree, but still, slow acceleration and engine breaking can increase around town mileage of a diesel rather than moving fast off the line and full speed to the line. If the game were to "keep it in the green" of a digital display, you'd be surprised how much better mileage anyone would get. Considering people are getting nearly 40MPG combined in the Audi A3 TDI, with "challenge" drivers in tests getting 50mpg+, putting that engine into a Prius would basically give you the same average mileage. People have been sold on hybrids so much by propaganda in the USA (and Japan) that they don't want to know the truth.

The point is, MOST, not all, MOST of the benefit of the prius over a diesel non-prius comes from the design and implementation of the non-powertrain components of the car.

If this weren't the case, then hybrid versions of cars like the civic wouldn't get worse mileage than the prius, but better (smaller ligher car). And the civic hybrid even has some of those tweaks, but not as many.

@martin

The ONLY markets for hybrid around the world are the USA and Japan, and in Japan, only for JAPANESE hybrids. The world has shunned them for diesels. Toyota sells 1/3rd of their hybrids at home, and 2/3rds around the world, but around the world means USA and basically nowhere else. For the largest automaker on the planet, this is meaningful.

The German companies are well aware that nobody but America wants non-Japanese hybrids, but due to US government intervention in the market, are working on some for our market at great expense, because they need them to help CAFE standards, and because the USA will offer tax incentives to buyers until they sell a certain number of hybrids.
by martin1212 July 27, 2009 6:28 PM PDT
Ikra, you said originally there is "no market for hybrids outside of the USA". I was just correcting you.
by sartor1 July 27, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
YAY! More progress! I get excited just reading about the progress ALL Auto makers are making in EVs and Hybrod Cars/trucks after so many many years of same-o same-o. Gas powered cars DIE! OPEC Die!

I wonder if this progress in electric vehicles eventually replacing Gas powered cars, will migrate down
to all small engine gas powered products like LAWN MOWERS, Leaf blowers (chargeable), edgers,
chain saws etc etc.. I know there are some already out there, but I am thinking Better battery tech migrating down.
I really hate to see/hear a loud overly powerful lawn mower used to mow a tiny lot in the city.. All the noise and pollution. UGH!
Reply to this comment
by Wrestlelexxx August 6, 2009 9:57 AM PDT
Things like the Recharge Mower(A lawn mower that runs on rechargeable batteries) are on the market now and they've said that more products are coming down the line. Check them out @ www.rechargemower.com
by Lakebook July 27, 2009 9:52 AM PDT
100 mile range it is more than enough for daily commute. If we want to go in road trip we can rent a car. No big deal. Die OPEC Die.Let me open a new browser window to check if my EV is charged and happy. Future welcome!
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ July 27, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
Pull out your smartphone, load up Google Maps, plan a route, then log into your car and see if it can go the distance. All while eating breakfast. :D
by tomboi1978 July 27, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
Rent a car every time I want to go more than 30miles from my house? I might as well buy a second car.
by ajhsys July 27, 2009 10:32 AM PDT
What we really need is an electric powered vehicle with some kind of on-board, gas powered charger. The Chevy Volt will have this, if they can every bring it to production. 40 miles using no gas, then a small engine recharges the battery. NO LIMIT on how far you can go, you just fill up the generator at a regular gas station. No additional infrasturcture needed for quick charging your battery.
by ZetaZeta_ July 27, 2009 11:32 AM PDT
"100 mile range"
... meaning "50 mile round trip"

tomboi says "30 miles from my house."

Nice math, bro.
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Would you trust the 50 mile range? I'd be nervous if I got to 40 miles, that due to various reasons (traffic jam, uneven power delivery, etc.) I wouldn't make it home.

30 miles from your house is a conservative measure to be safe that every day, you will not be stuck on the side of the road requiring a flatbed tow home...
by tomboi1978 July 27, 2009 3:18 PM PDT
To ZetaZeta I can do math fine. The number 30 was derived from estimating how far the car will actually go on a charge (about 20% less than they say) and then adding a safety margin. Almost no one drives their cars in such a way that it gets the mileage listed on the sticker.
by willdryden July 28, 2009 9:30 AM PDT
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Would you trust the 50 mile range? I'd be nervous if I got to 40 miles, that due to various reasons (traffic jam, uneven power delivery, etc.) I wouldn't make it home.

Traffic jams would cause the vehicle to go further as wind drag would be less. The real question is 100 miles at what speed. The slower you go the further you can get.
by tomboi1978 July 27, 2009 9:59 AM PDT
The problem has been and will be for the forseeable future, the range of all electrics. Until they make one that can go at least as far as a normal gasoline car on a single charge very few people are going to buy them. While it is true that 90% of my driving is less than 50 miles per day, I don't want to have to own a second car for when I decide to head to Vegas for the weekend. I also don't want to think about the replacement cost of the battery when it fails in 5 years. A co-worker just had to have the battery replaced on her '04 Civic Hybrid. Lucky she was just within warantee still. If she hadn't been the cost would have been nearly $4k. Keep in mind thats for a battery that only has enough power to move the car a few blocks without the gas engine. (The Civic Hybrid doesn't function in all-electric mode like the Prius but the battery capacity is about the same for each.)
Reply to this comment
by ajhsys July 27, 2009 10:29 AM PDT
All hybrid cars in the USA must come with at least an 8 year battery warranty. I believe CA has mandated a 10 year battery warranty on hybrids, so most manufacturers will shoot for that. Just sell the car every 5 years
by Renegade Knight July 27, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
One thing they can do is make the batteries user installable and user replacalbe. Build the car for 40 miles (or pick a umber) but let the user add batteries to the bank as they can afford them to get 40, 100. 200 etc.
by ajhsys July 27, 2009 1:07 PM PDT
I don't think a user replaceable battery will ever be offered. It is one thing to replace a 12 volt battery in a gas powered car, it is completely different to change the 330 volt batteries in some hybrids. The liability factors alone, if someone shorts out the thing and kills himself, would prevent most parts suppliers from selling them. People set their cars on fire changing a 12 volt battery while smoking! Hybrids already have to have an automatic battery disconnect in case of an accident so emergency responders aren't electrocuted. DANGER, there be amps here!
by tomboi1978 July 27, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
you are correct ajhsys. I spoke to my coworker and she asys the warranty is for 10 years. In 04 when she bought it the warranty was for 5 but shortly after federal law was changed to 8 yrs and ca one upped and said 10.
by AppleSuxLeo July 27, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
Always liked NISSAN better than Toyota or Honda. Go NISSAN !
Reply to this comment
by ekeefe41 July 27, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
Can it go 12 miles, then sit in freezing weather for 10.5 hours, then drive 12 miles again?
My experience with battery's is they die in the cold.

Who knows if these new battery's can handle the cold.
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
They don't die in the cold, actually. What happens is that they need to be a little warmer to get the reaction going, but the potential is still in the battery. So you'd need some sort of battery warmer (running on batteries?) to prevent that. Then you'd need a warmer to warm the batteries that run the battery warmer...
by ZetaZeta_ July 27, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
It's not out of the range of reason to imagine a battery warmer that works when cold. I mean, my Sony PSP works after sitting in freezing weather overnight. So does my laptop (which was a huge mistake on my part) but it still worked, and warmed up like it always does.
Anyway, if the big efficient car battery doesn't work when cold, I'm sure something else that heats it up would. It's not like all batteries stop working 100% when they're cold.
by ikramerica--2008 July 27, 2009 1:14 PM PDT
Well, it depends on how cold you are talking about. Many digital cameras stop working on ski trips to the Alps, for example. And while your PSP may work as you say, check the specs. If you are using it in the cold, you are using it outside Sony's design specs. Same for using it outside when it's over 90 degrees or so.
by MadLyb July 27, 2009 12:15 PM PDT
Good parts...it is totally electric and skips the whole Hybrid scam.

Bad parts...it is a tin can and an ugly one at that.

Come on Tesla. I will gladly pay a premium for an Electric Vehicle that outperforms most gas vehicles and looks good to boot.
Reply to this comment
by ajhsys July 28, 2009 1:58 PM PDT
Most people can't afford the $109,000 price tag of the new Tesla. That's quite a premium! And don't forget the additional options if you want them, up to another $10,000. And you are still limited to 240 miles on a charge, then you have to push it. Call a few hotels and ask if you can plug your car in every night so it can recharge. I bet you will start to see additional room fees for electric car charging.

We really need vehicles that can recharge themselves while driving. And regenerative braking is only part of the answer. You still need an internal combustion engine to run the generator.
by MadLyb August 1, 2009 8:10 PM PDT
Actually ajhsys, I was talking about the forthcoming Tesla S, which has a much more reasonable price (compared to the roadster), and has different battery configs. Add a totally sexy style and we have a winner.

Don't get me wrong, I wish the cars were more affordable, had better range, and that proper infrastructure was in place to support them, but traditional hybrids are a total scam for the environmentally pretentious and the 'new' hybrids that use the gas engine to charge the battery are still a band-aid...a better one, but still a band-aid.
by georgemacdonald July 27, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
Why not design these cars with modular power packs? Then you could swap packs while another is charging. You could charge one at home while working... If enough people used them then you could even rent packs when on long trips from a "power station".

Another approach would be to tow a small trailer with a power module. The power module could be
one or more power packs, diesel/electric, gas/electric, fuel cell, ...

It would be cool to drive around California stopping in at some green power stations to swap packs. Imagine going from the Altamont wind farm to the geothermal station in the north valley's, heading up in the mountains via some hydro stations, then the desert and solar power towers...I bet you could drive around the state forever on the green energy systems already in place!!!

Now that would be some serious FREEDOM of movement!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by ajhsys July 28, 2009 6:45 AM PDT
One company is actually working on this. You would have to find one of their battery stations, and the power pack is swapped by their technicians. Again, the problem is the danger of changing a high voltage battery. If you don't know what you are doing, you will get zapped. Keep in mind that there are people who can't figure out how to pump gas, and companies like AAA are in business to help people who don't know how to use jumper cables. Can you imagine your mother trying to swap out a 200 lb. battery?

I doubt this will work. Unless standards are set for the battery pack, you will have to have battery stations all over the country for every manufacturer of replaceable packs. Not very practical, and those very standards will slow future development of new and better batteries.
by across04 July 27, 2009 2:45 PM PDT
Check out http://www.betterplace.com

Nissan is working with them on building charging stations where batteries can be swapped out, just like an automated carwash.

The batteries are not part of the cost of the car- instead you pay for a mileage plan, just like a cell phone plan. This way, the car owner is not stuck with batteries, if there is a malfunction.

Battery technoiogy is improving greatly, this is the way to go.
Batteries are where excess wind and solar power can be stored, for use later when the sun goes down or behind the clouds!

Also, battery tech can spur on other technologies, like nuclear power, and more efficient burning of hydrocarbons.

This is really the way to go, and with momentum built in the congested cities and the shorter commutes, then the infrastructure can be built out to include most people.
Reply to this comment
by ChargeMyOwnBattery July 27, 2009 5:41 PM PDT
This idea to have a battery leased is a JOKE! Once you've leased a battery then its like intellectual property which provides you no ownership of the battery EVER. I'd love to see the licensing rules applied to this type of model. Think about all the do's and donts that will be enforced? What if you supply your own power with, wind and solar where energy then becomes free. They may write some rule that restricts the use of such methods. Theres all sorts of other issues that arise with such a accessable battery, the cost of the battery is high, you can put all the security measures to lock that battery in, but i guarentee there will be theives that will figure out a way to pry them out. Think about the dollars that will be made with these on the black market. Why would i want to risk receiving a defective battery? Once you realized you got a defective battery It's not like you can run to the battery swapping station, pick up a battery and install it your self, I think on average there like 300-400 pounds, you'll be towing that sucker everytime, the towing companies are probably salavating at this idea.

To have a battery swapping station installed in convient locations nation wide will be VERY COSTLY! I dont have the figures of the cost for these stations but when your talking about machine automation to swap out your batteries, the cost to develop these sites, cost of the land to implement, cost of maintaining ownership of the stations you can bet that those cost will be passed on to the consumer.

I just want to take the plug and stick it in my car and charge it, SIMPLE. Installing charging stations at home, workplace, grocery store, mall, transit stations, and wherever you can think of is cost effective, does not require the purchase of land, maintence cost will be low since your maintaing a very simple structure with very little moving parts. ECOTALITY (ecotality.com) i hope will pull through with this vision. There Mint Charger which claims it can recharge a battery between 10-15 minutes (if true) is the answer. With software installed on your vechicle to cut of any excessive charging, you can run into the store while your car charges, by the time your done, your good to go. Then you can actually pay for the energy your planning to use, rather then all the cost thats been passed onto the consumer by the battery swapping stations.
by 1st July 27, 2009 2:51 PM PDT
The car industry just not get it: people don't buy cars not because the efficiency, oil gas, etc. it just not cool any more. The old 50s car showed character and it was a boy's accessory: in order to catch a girl's eyes, you need cars that has fins, show off with leather seat; etc. flashy color with chrome. No longer. All the cars went into utility class. Serve as tool to get you from A to B as efficient as possible, with different weight load class. All of them are very similar, can't tell them apart from one to another from 10 meters away. Girls could get one if they wanted just as cheep. No characters at all (unless you pay out for arms and legs). Its time to get back to have some cool cars on the lot. The one that can spot miles away (assume not catch Cops eyes only). Where are all the designers? Learn something form Batmobile....
Reply to this comment
by mrcockrell July 27, 2009 4:40 PM PDT
do this car come with the p**** magnet?
by ca5ter July 27, 2009 5:12 PM PDT
poop
Reply to this comment
by jwhenry30 July 30, 2009 9:39 PM PDT
Yes, Your vehicle must be less than 25 years old on the trade-in date

Henry
Blogger
www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
Reply to this comment
by jhenry3107 July 30, 2009 10:21 PM PDT
That is correct, Only purchase or lease of new vehicles qualify

Jimhenry
Blogger
www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.info
Reply to this comment
by kaliocho3 August 26, 2009 8:53 AM PDT
The Tesla is a nice looking electric car. This new site, Kuuala.com has some cool-looking green products too
Reply to this comment
(44 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right