• On mySimon: The North Face Mountain Sneakers for Men
June 8, 2009 8:54 AM PDT

GM opens auto battery research plant

by Martin LaMonica
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 9 comments

General Motors opened the doors to a battery research and development plant in Michigan on Monday, a facility the company says will accelerate its move to electric vehicles.

The Global Battery Systems Lab in Warren, Mich., will be used to test the lithium ion batteries planned for the Chevy Volt as well as other energy storage systems such as ultracapacitors, GM said.

Destined for a Volt: the lithium ion battery pack to be used in the Chevy Volt and potentially other GM electric vehicles.

(Credit: General Motors)

The facility, at 33,000 square feet, is four times larger than GM's existing testing operation and will be used by 1,000 engineers, according to the company which hosted a ceremony with Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm and GM CEO Fritz Henderson.

"Our new lab improves GM's competitiveness by speeding the development of our hybrid, plug-in and extended-range electric vehicles, including the Chevrolet Volt," Henderson said in a statement.

Construction of the plant started last August and full operation began in May of this year.

Earlier this year, GM said that it would enter the battery business because the technology is considered strategic to its future cars. The auto giant, which filed for bankruptcy protection last week, said it still intends to have the Chevy Volt electric car available by the end of 2010.

The facility will be able to test the properties of individual cells as well as battery packs. General Motors intends to build its own battery packs for the Chevy Volt, using cells and control electronics from LG Chem.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Nissan says all-electric Leaf will compete on price
Wary green-tech venture investors shift gears
Start-up compresses air in tanks for energy storage
DOE technologist handicaps impact of carbon price
Start-ups partner on universal wireless charger
U.S. Army orders bridges made of recycled plastic
Powering cell phone towers with wind
Flywheels to buffer 20 megawatts on grid
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by seanpv June 8, 2009 9:19 AM PDT
Too bad they didn't have the foresight to do this years ago.
Reply to this comment
by iptofar June 8, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
Are their battery pack designs planning on going where the transmission and differential use to go? Does anyone else think that is dated thinking?
Reply to this comment
by erik98671 June 8, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
I agree. Battery packs should be replaceable. You should be able to drive up to an old gas station and exchange for a set of pre-charged batteries.
by Vegaman_Dan June 8, 2009 9:49 AM PDT
The 'tranismission tunnel' hump has been there for years. Even on cars that do not have a drive line, there is often a console in the middle of the front seats anyways. Most of it is wasted space so this makes sense.

Put the batteries low and centered in the car for the best stability and traction.
by monkeyfun14 June 8, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
And stuffing them in the backseats is a better ideas?
by Sourdust June 8, 2009 10:16 AM PDT
Why should they be replaceable in the Volt? It has a built in generator that charges the battery as needed.
by Been_there_Saw_it_before June 8, 2009 1:20 PM PDT
Some small tidbit that most people do not realize is that the hump down the middle is a major structural element that gives the body the necessary stiffness. The floor pan is about the only thing that connects the front and back. The door openings contribute nothing and the roof by itself would require much larger corner posts.
by squished June 8, 2009 8:08 PM PDT
The same thought occurred to me but it probably makes sense from a cost perspective. The less you redesign the overall vehicle, the fewer unknowns you have to deal with during testing and the more you get to use existing manufacturing processes. 2010 has been considered an ambitious goal ever since GM announced their plans, so they need to do everything possible to cut engineering time. Plus I agree with Vegaman, keeping those heavy batteries low would greatly improve traction.
by Lelan5 June 18, 2009 8:14 PM PDT
Believe it or not, lead acid heavy batteries are not the answer. keeping structural design and replace weight where you take weight away.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right