• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
May 19, 2009 5:14 PM PDT

Future air-fueled battery could store 10 times more power

by Erik Palm
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 21 comments

A new type of air-fueled battery being studied could provide up to 10 times the energy storage of designs currently available, and someday be used to power electric cars, mobile phones, and laptops, say researchers.

"Our results so far are very encouraging and have far exceeded our expectations," said professor Peter Bruce, of the University of St Andrews' chemistry department, in a news release Monday.

Diagram of the STAIR (St. Andrews Air) cell. Oxygen drawn from the air reacts within the porous carbon to release the electrical charge in this lithium air battery.

(Credit: EPSRC)
The new idea the researchers are examining is to replace the lithium cobalt oxide electrode in today's rechargeable lithium batteries with a porous carbon electrode. This allows lithium ions and electrons in the cell to react instead with oxygen in the ambient air, according to a press release from the U.K.'s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, which finances the research conducted at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. The project has received about 1.6 million British pounds ($2.4 million) from the EPSRC.

According to the researchers, the new design could potentially improve the performance of portable electronic devices and provide a big boost to the renewable-energy industry. The researchers see a scenario in which the batteries will enable a constant electrical output from sources such as wind or solar. Also the STAIR (St. Andrews Air) cell could help power electric cars.

The STAIR cell is expected to be cheaper than rechargeable batteries of today, the researchers said. The new component is made of porous carbon, which is much less expensive than the lithium cobalt oxide it would be replacing.

"The key is to use oxygen in the air as a reagent, rather than carry the necessary chemicals around inside the battery," Bruce said.

The four-year research project began two years ago and is scheduled to end in June 2011. Bruce expects it will be at least five years before the STAIR cell is commercially available.

Erik Palm, a business reporter for Swedish national television, is joining CNET News as a spring 2009 fellow with Stanford University's Innovation Journalism program. When he's not working, he enjoys kayaking and exploring California's hiking trails. E-mail Erik.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Solar-power start-up Ausra looks to sell itself
CEOs endorse 'foothold strategy' for electric cars
Nissan says all-electric Leaf will compete on price
Wary green-tech venture investors shift gears
Start-up compresses air in tanks for energy storage
DOE technologist handicaps impact of carbon price
Start-ups partner on universal wireless charger
U.S. Army orders bridges made of recycled plastic
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by James Anderson Merritt May 19, 2009 5:53 PM PDT
So is the idea that, during "discharge," the oxygen-lithium compound is produced, but during "recharge," the "consumed" oxygen is liberated? Wouldn't that be explosive?
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy May 19, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
Not sure why my earlier reply from an hour ago never appeared.Re-posting.

No, for 2 reasons
1) The produced oxygen can dissipate via the same porous carbon electrode - it is 2-way permeable unlike the 1-way semi/selectively permeable membranes in fuel cells
2) The rate would be small enough not to build up pressure in the cell.
by mraardvark May 19, 2009 7:06 PM PDT
Depends on how much O2 is released and if there is anything nearby to burn. A car battery would be the only thing big enough to raise the O2 levels in room to something dangerous and that's if it charges really fast. Even then it takes a lot of 02 gas to create a dangerous situation. nothing a vent fan in you garage couldn't fix.

interestingly this battery should get lighter as it charges, and gain weight as it discharges.
by Seashell-Bob May 19, 2009 6:13 PM PDT
WOW this will finally put the electric vehicle in the practical column. Just think of the power generating facilities that will have to be built to provide the power. I'll bet Obama will stop it dead in it's tracks.
Reply to this comment
by barbose May 19, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
Yeah, cuz Obama and the Dems hate alternate fuels and the Bushies hate the oilmen. Doofus.
by mc364 May 19, 2009 7:34 PM PDT
manganese..alot of people don't even know what that is
Reply to this comment
by RammerRW May 20, 2009 12:43 AM PDT
It sounds like an Asian country. Or someone obsessed with manga. ;P

(Yes, i do know what it really is, btw)
by hador_nyc May 20, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
i got your reference to caddyshack... very funny Carl... or should i say Bill?
by Atlas_ May 19, 2009 8:37 PM PDT
Nice idea. too bad I will never be able to buy one, like all nice ideas this will be
1. too expensive
2. only available in Japan
3. works too well and killed in Dev by some corporate fool.
4. a threat to the car companies, so they will buy the idea and put it on a shelf, never to be heard of again.
Reply to this comment
by Electro_Fox May 19, 2009 9:06 PM PDT
I really hate to say this... Mister Atlas is so motherf#@king right... Do the fu*%ing math, wow...
by gsigas May 19, 2009 9:34 PM PDT
@Atlas_ I agree. I bet it is probably #1 (or perhaps it is impossible to mass produce). A 10 times storage improvement is such a game changer that I think there must be some major catch that makes this research useless in practical terms because the potential benefits are too large otherwise (a 2 hour solar power battery backup becomes a 20 hour backup, a 40 mile per charge electric car suddenly becomes a 400 mile per charge car). If it was real, this technology would be in such high demand that it would not be 5 years to market, it would be more like 18 months to market (it would easily attract millions or tens of millions of investment dollars). You could almost guarantee the full production of these batteries would sell out immediately. This means that there almost certainly has to be a major catch/issue that isn't mentioned.
by oversig May 20, 2009 2:58 AM PDT
I agree 100% WTG!
Where always hearing of great & amazing new ideas.
Always just a few years away!
And then NOTHING MORE ABOUT IT EVER AGAIN!!
Realy tick's me the He** off!
by boyblueguard May 19, 2009 9:41 PM PDT
what we always dream for our Alternative energy solution for our future still look like live behind our small brain. we just sit and see, lucky people who can feel a new technology then promote it to all people in the world. "any kind of technology". we, surely cant feel directly what technology be made, what is the first purpose to make it, we substitute that, from general purpose to individual purpose, because we still have a big orientation that if we make a new technology "any kind of technology" we never realized that we are not make for human kind but for what we always want to get our individual goal "glory".

because of that technology become new market for human to build something but hiding inside something. sell is one type of activity to release an abnormal movie for our own life. if we find a new technology, of course technology to make human kind better, what will we do first? sell it for free or sell it with expensive price? technology is made from brain to react what we called imagination pressure. not intelligent pressure. so the pressure have made from our brain almost react for individual purpose in what truly purpose is.
Reply to this comment
by iceman2929 May 20, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
Hahaha plz tell me you are russian! because this sounds perfect when read with a russian accent!
by ikramerica--2008 May 19, 2009 11:16 PM PDT
This seems like another battery along the lines of the Zinc-Air technology that never took over the market as promised. It is also promising, I invested in it with a little money in one of the companies trying to market it, and it failed. Well, it didn't exactly fail, but the company went BK and then sold the assets to Energizer, IIRC. After the shareholders got screwed. Zinc-Air is still considered a "promising technology" despite the decade of going nowhere.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 May 20, 2009 7:01 AM PDT
Atleast you tried. That's more than I can say for others.
by zyxxy May 20, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
There are zinc/air batteries in use. Hearing aid batteries are often zinc/air, with a little piece of sealing tape that needs to be pulled off to activate that battery. There are also large cartridge style zinc/air cells that are suitable for vehicle applications. Their reload cycle was never made convenient for 'consumer' use, but has been made manageable for certain fleet applications.

So when you say 'promising technology', that term only applies to certain application domains. For hearing aides, they are widely accepted and deployed. For vehicle applications, it is much more isolated. It is a great technology as far as volumetric power density. For high current/high power apps there are concerns with the toxicity and caustic nature of the electrolyte.
by walto034 May 20, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
As a staunch conservative, who believes entirely in the free market, this is something I could get 100% behind. My primary gripes with alternative energies, previously, is that they are too expensive and too inefficient. This battery technology could be a real game-changer that would actually survive in a free market without government propping it up with subsidies, see ethanol industry as a reference.

If the batteries pan out as advertised, it has the potential to change the infrastructure of the country while still giving the environmentalists the low emissions they want. Win-win-win.
Reply to this comment
by mjtimber May 22, 2009 2:46 AM PDT
Hmm...what about the anode? I recall a similar situation with silicon nanowires at Stanford, but that was focused on the anode. Now, if only we can get these two together and keep it cost completitive...
Reply to this comment
by mjtimber May 22, 2009 2:49 AM PDT
Wait, competitive. That's what I get for being up at 3am.
Reply to this comment
by mjtimber May 22, 2009 3:00 AM PDT
As for the comments regarding Zinc-Air, the problem with hearing aid batteries is that they aren't rechargeable. In fact, Alkaline batteries (Duracell, Energizer, etc.) are essentially Zinc-Air batteries. It's the recharging part they were trying to improve.
Reply to this comment
(21 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right