EPA investigating alleged Google chemical release
Greener-than-thou Google, which takes environmentalism seriously, is under investigation by the Environmental Protection Agency for an alleged coolant problem at one of its data centers, the company disclosed Wednesday.
"In February 2009, we learned of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency investigation into an alleged release of refrigerant at one of our smaller data facilities, which we acquired from DoubleClick, and the accuracy of related statements and records," Google said in a quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
"We are cooperating with the EPA and have provided documents and other materials. The EPA investigation could result in fines, civil or criminal penalties, or other administrative action," Google said.
How much in the way of fines? Probably peanuts, compared to Google's net income of $1.3 billion for the first quarter of 2009, but any amount would probably sting for a company that's focused on efficient data centers and fixing the country's energy problems.
"While we currently believe this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, we have noted it in accord with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations that call for disclosure of certain environmental proceedings that may result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more," Google said in the filing.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 





Lay with dogs and rise with fleas....
- by mistergray May 7, 2009 8:52 AM PDT
- C'mon guys and gals... it's OK for the Google to pollute. Just like it's OK for Algore to spew carbon.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)It's all for our own good in the long run, right?