• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
March 23, 2009 11:32 AM PDT

Obama commits $1.2. billion in energy R&D

by Martin LaMonica
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments

Updated at 12:55 p.m. PDT with comments from Foundation Capital. Updated at 3:45 a.m. PDT March 24 with corrected figure for total government investment in clean energy and efficiency.

Seeking to boost the U.S. clean-energy industry, President Obama on Monday announced $1.2 billion for science research at national labs and a proposal to extend a business tax credit for investments in research and development.

At an event at the White House, Obama told researchers and green-technology business people that their work was vital to revitalizing the U.S. economy and cutting the country's dependence on foreign oil. About 120 researchers, lab directors, and CEOs from energy technology companies attended the event.

President Barack Obama at the White House speaking to researchers and clean-technology company CEOs.

(Credit: Screen capture by Martin LaMonica/CNET)

"We need some inventiveness. Your country needs you to mount a historical effort to end, once and for all, our dependence on foreign oil," Obama said. "Your country will support you, and your president will support you."

Obama said that his administration's budget proposes a 10-year extension to a tax credit for businesses that make investments in research and development. This tax credit has been in place in the past, but lacked a long-term commitment from the federal government, he said.

For every dollar that the government spends on this tax credit, it delivers two dollars to the economy, Obama said.

Obama also announced the availability of $1.2 billion in basic research at the Department of Energy's national laboratories. In addition to money to upgrade facilities at national labs, grants are available for research in renewable energy, such as solar power and biofuels, as well as in nuclear energy, underground storage of carbon dioxide, and hydrogen.

The stimulus package calls for an additional $371 million in research, which officials have not yet approved, according to the DOE.

Obama said that through the stimulus package, the federal government has set aside $59 billion in direct spending and in tax incentives to promote clean energy and energy efficiency. That investment will lead to 3.5 million jobs, 90 percent of which will be created in the private sector, he said.

During his talk, he singled out a few companies for their innovations and contributions to creating jobs.

Among them was Serious Materials, which makes energy-efficient windows and drywall that uses 80 percent less energy to produce than gypsum. Earlier this month, the California-based company reopened a window factory in Pennsylvania that had closed, resulting in 100 lost jobs.

The research and development investment tax credit is a "crucial tool" for green-technology businesses, said Paul Holland, a venture capitalists at Foundation Capital, which invested in Serious Materials and many other green-tech start-ups.

Many successful tech companies, like Intel and Netflix, would "not be where they are today if it were not for the progressive policies, such as the federal R&D tax credit and the stimulus plan," Holland said.

In an interview, Holland said the federal government needs to play a role in the financing "food chain" for green-tech start-ups that need capital to expand.

"The middle tier of finance--the private equity firms, which were pretty vital to clean tech have been decimated over the last couple of years," he said. "The federal government has become the provider of last resort in that part of the food chain."

On Friday, the Department of Energy said it expects to provide a $535 million loan guarantee to solar start-up Solyndra, the first loan done by the DOE in four years.

Another speaker at the event was Susan Hockfield, the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where researchers have created a number of energy-related innovations over the past few years, such as fast-charging battery technology and more efficient solar energy conversion.

She lauded the Obama administration's commitment to clean energy, saying the investments in research are comparable to the jolt of technology development that occurred during the space race in the 1960s.

"(The research and development tax credits) offer the only route to the breakthroughs we need to address energy security, rapidly increasing energy demand, and climate change," Hockfield said.

Holland said that the clean-tech industry has shown it can effectively spin out companies from research universities or national labs.

"I think this is just a different time," he said. "The focus in Washington is on invention, innovation, getting jobs, and getting various pieces of the clean-tech industry more competitive for the long term."

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Science untarnished by 'Climategate,' U.N. says
U.S., China help climate talks, but tangles remain
Looking under Nissan's Leaf
Utility energy storage no longer just giant batteries
California unveils draft cap-and-trade rules
DOE smart-grid trials fund utility-scale energy storage
Wave energy generator pumps power to Scotland
Norway opens world's first osmotic power plant
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by myles taylor March 23, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
This is a start. This is why I voted for him and I'm glad to see that it's going into effect.
Reply to this comment
by BogusBasin March 23, 2009 1:27 PM PDT
What will all the republicans be saying in a few years when our investments in alternative energies start paying real dividends? I can just see them taking credit for it all, or trying to outsource it all. Thank you Obama! Finally, a leader with vision and the guts to do something about it. Welcome back middle class!
Reply to this comment
by Tui Pohutukawa March 23, 2009 2:03 PM PDT
Marvellous. He spends more billions he doesn't have.
Reply to this comment
by pokiri March 23, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
yeah . I would rather buy oil and burn this planet. Down with these kind of new energy initiatives.
by fubar22 March 24, 2009 12:54 AM PDT
I wonder if that is re-circulated print, or hot off the press print.....? Hmmmmmmmm?.....A conumdrum.

And Pokiri.....Sit down and have a drink. It sounds like you could use a few.
by Vegaman_Dan March 23, 2009 2:13 PM PDT
I know the old phrase is that you have to spend money to make money, but what happens when you don't have that money to spend in the first place?

Where is all this money coming from that Obama is freely spreading around like fertilizer in hopes that something will grow?

I just don't understand this need to plunge this country into a debt level unseen in human history. I would think the responsibility would be to get out of debt, not add on more. :/
Reply to this comment
by kenyee March 23, 2009 2:18 PM PDT
What actually helps most is high gas prices...there was more innovation last year than I've seen in a long while. That's also why Europe has adopted high efficiency diesel engines that aren't smoggy.

The deficits for the next 10 years are forecast to be 4x the deficits of the Bush era which I thought were ridiculously high already. Can you say hyperinflation and dollar devaluation? Of course, that only matters if you were responsible enough to save your money but apparently most people bought houses they couldn't afford instead ;-)
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok March 24, 2009 5:57 AM PDT
This all happened once already. Government spending (Obama now, "great society" in the 60s) followed by tremendous record-setting deficits (late 60's to 70's, and currently forecast) followed by 20 years of malaise and inflation. With all the national debt owed to the Chinese now, there won't be "hyperinflation" but the dollar will lose 1/2 to 2/3 of its value in the coming years.
by kristianna Thomas March 23, 2009 2:20 PM PDT
The commitment of monies towards research and development in energy is, I feel, a welcome sight. While the rest of the world is already creating massive solar farms and utilizing solar technologies, we are lagging far behind in implementation of such. I feel that Obama needs to set real goals and realistic time frames for completion of such energy projects that should go on line soon. But, the problem still remains that the average city is awash in energy waste, from houses and apartment complexes that have aged utility systems and are uninsulated. There are no incentive programs that would encourage home and apartment owners to retrofit in order to save energy, which includes solar energy and other such technologies. What good is creating more energy efficient windows if there are no one to buy them. Production and use have to go hand and hand in order for his program to work. If this does create 3.5 million jobs, what of the millions who have lost their jobs in the past ten years? It may not be enough, but at least it is a start. Energy wise for an energy green planet.
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok March 24, 2009 6:02 AM PDT
Oh look, the "we're lagging behind," best we do something. Where exactly is solar and wind a viable power source? Some island off the North sea with 100 people on it? Who are we lagging behind exactly? Europe where energy costs are 5-10x what they are here? No thanks.
by Tui Pohutukawa March 23, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
So, unless the governments commands us to be inventive, and gives us loads of cash as well, we're not capable of establishing a sustainable economy?

If that's true, we're toast.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan March 23, 2009 6:04 PM PDT
ExWinUser wrote:

"****"

When you lead by example, your comments will have more merit.
by pokiri March 23, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
Pres. Obama, go ahead. Don't listen to the complaints from the fat cat oil bosses and their stooges ( who happened to invest multi-billions in oil )
Reply to this comment
by fubar22 March 24, 2009 12:58 AM PDT
somebody has been watching too many campaign adds.
P.S.
Do you really think Obama is going to read this?
by Manhattan2 March 23, 2009 4:28 PM PDT
The only Solar Energy Program the US should move forward on is the SolarTransfer.com program. Any other investment is just adding debt that will never be recouped. Solar Transfer seeks to capture the highest amount of solar energy for the lowest GHG cost. That is the only solution that will be competitive and that will truly work. Obama throwing money into ill advised programs and research is just an effort of futility. If you have the ear of the President or that of the Energy Secretary make sure they take the time to investigate a Solar Transfer.
Reply to this comment
by George_Marenco March 23, 2009 7:45 PM PDT
Impeach Obama already.
Reply to this comment
by fubar22 March 24, 2009 12:59 AM PDT
And replace him with who?????
If you say McCain.....Your dumb. He's dead. Always has been. Just look at him.
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right