Mass. school makes leap to wind power
People gather after the ribbon cutting on a 100-kilowatt wind turbine at the McGlynn Middle School in Medford, Mass.
(Credit: Martin LaMonica/CNET Networks)MEDFORD, Mass.--Wind turbines themselves aren't exactly exotic--thousands of them are already installed around the world. But it is unusual to see a 150-foot-high turbine spinning next to a middle school football field.
The Boston suburb of Medford cut the ribbon on a 100-kilowatt wind turbine on Thursday in a ceremony that included speeches from the mayor and a long line of children. It is said to be the first commercial-size wind turbine installed at a public Massachusetts school.
The turbine at the John J. McGlynn Middle School will offset about 10 percent of the school's electricity, saving the city budget $25,000 a year.
"How long are we going to be dependent on other parts of the world for energy? Everybody talks about it, (but) nobody wants to do anything," Medford Mayor Michael McGlynn remarked after cutting the ribbon on the turbine.
Getting the turbine installed required a sustained commitment and creative thinking on financing, officials said.
Few municipalities have the money available to simply purchase a turbine. They typically cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to install. The city also faced opposition from people who feared that the turbine would be an eyesore, McGlynn said.
In the case of Medford, a clean-energy committee worked on the project for three years and was able to pay for it by raising about $650,000 in grants.
The savings from the turbine help finance the project as well, according to city officials who project that it will pay for itself in seven to eight years.
At one point, there was a possibility of raising money by selling the naming rights, as many sports stadiums have done. But the city was able to get a $100,000 grant from the nonprofit Mass Energy Consumers Alliance. One condition of the grant was a commitment to establish an education program in solar power and other types of alternative energy.
Education is a big part of the project's goal, according to McGlynn. Inside the school, there will be a display of how much electricity the turbine is producing.
During the ceremony in the school's auditorium, students spoke about how important alternative energy and the environment are to their future, which McGlynn said was "inspirational."
"It's not by chance that this (turbine) is down by the school," he said. "We want to educate...and it's the kids who always lead the parents."
Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin. 






Saves $25,000 a year
Break even mark = 26 YEARS!!
Irony at it's finest...
I don't get the math of the system paying for itself in 7-8 years if it is saving $25,000 per year. Does that mean it cost an additional $200,000 above the $650,000 in grants?
I wonder about the economics of a 100KW turbine. From the specs, it needs 34mph to generate full power, 20mph at half power-- that seems pretty windy. The large >1MW turbines in the midwest are cost competitive with natural gas, and have much lower installed cost/W-peak. The Medford unit seems to be ~$7/W instead of $2.
Besides, I'm not sure when aesthetics became so important to people when we are desperately trying to find better and cheaper ways to produce energy.
NOT!
A lot of us are wondering about the financial numbers in your article. Clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
For more detail, here's what I can offer:
-The city took out a loan as part of the financing, so it paid for some of this upfront as it waits for the loan money to come in.
-On an annual basis, it will be saving $25,000 a year on electricity (conservatively). They also will be earning $7500 on renewable energy credits. There is $10,000 a year from GreenUp, a program run by the utility National Grid to promote efficiency and renewable energy in municipalities.
These financial calculations are important but to be clear, return on investment was not the only goal (maybe not even the primary goal). The city and mayor decided to put up the turbine. Then they went about the business of getting grants. McGlynn said their goal was multifaceted--environmental, economic, and education. He added that this city's model may not work everywhere.
http://www.medfordcleanenergy.org/MEIPoverview.html
The page shows funding breakdown and other information on the turbine
- A proud Medford teacher
I am all for wind energy, when properly placed and is an efficient use of public funds. Grant money wasted on a frivolous project means these dollars not available for serious and appropriate projects.
Economics should count, even with public money.
What happens when one of these turbines explodes in heavy winds and someone gets hurt. It will set back wind energy many, many years...
But in the mean time, let's all give each other hugs and go home and turn on the tube.
The way I see this is,
Savings of $25,000.00 per year of taxes.
Environmentally safe.
Creates no carbon emissions.
Creats less independence on foreign oil.
Saves American soldiers lives--- PRICELESS INVESTMENT
Thank you for this informative article and video. I was curious about the sounds the wind turbine makes. I could not tell from the video if the turbine was making a significant sound. Thanks in advance.
- by chumlyb February 12, 2009 10:05 PM PST
- I have only seen the turbine from the highway ramp but I would imagine that any noise it make is drowned out by the ever present deafening roar of Route 93. And I would rather listen to a windmill any day than the noise of the nonstop cars and trucks that impacts so much of the City.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)