Energy efficiency high on Obama stimulus plan
President-elect Barack Obama on Saturday said that building energy efficiency is central to his administration's economic recovery plan and outlined the conditions he intends to impose on ailing U.S. automakers.
In his weekly radio address, which is broadcast on YouTube, Obama laid out the planks a government-led spending program meant to revitalize the U.S. economy and create jobs.
"First, we will launch a massive effort to make public buildings more energy-efficient. Our government now pays the highest energy bill in the world. We need to change that. We need to upgrade our federal buildings by replacing old heating systems and installing efficient light bulbs," he said in his radio address.
He also pledged to make federal money available to rebuild roads, upgrade schools to be energy efficient, and expand broadband access to schoolchildren.
The energy plan is expected to include a commitment to upgrade the electricity distribution infrastructure. By equipping the grid with communications network--the essence of smart grid technology--utilities can run the power grid more efficiently and consumers can get information to help lower energy usage.
An aide told the The New York Times that the green collar portion of the stimulus plan could be $100 billion over two years.
Following his radio address, Obama taped an interview which aired on Sunday's edition of Meet the Press.
In response to questions about the plight of U.S. automakers, Obama said that he does not want to allow the financially strapped corporations to collapse because they are the backbone of the manufacturing industry.
However, he said that any federal assistance will come at the price of "significant adjustments from all their stakeholders." He said his advisers are devising ways to keep automakers "feet to the fire," as a bankruptcy court does, to reflect the urgency of change.
"You have seen some progress made incrementally in many of these companies...They are making some investments in the kind of green technologies and new batteries that will let them make plug-in hybrids," Obama said. "What we haven't seen is the sense of urgency and willingness to make tough decisions."
Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.






The basic opposition to coal and decades of foot dragging on nuclear may put us nationally into a situation such as suffered by California about 7 years ago when, after refusing to build power plants for a quarter century, ran into trouble when those supplying power from of state needed it for themselves.
Power requirements peak. Suddenly we'll have brownouts. And the American population doesn't have the fortitude required to get through something in time of need.
Those that have blocked the power companies from expanding base power supplies will be the first to blame the "corporations" for the predicament. Its standard practice.
I'm all for more wind and solar and other means but I find most "alternative power activists" to be the most fickle among us. They were against nuclear for decades then reversed their thinking, now with Obama tepid on nuclear they are not so sure. Which way are the political winds blowing today? - it'll change the stance of the majority in that groups point of view. Other examples available.
True demand for energy grows at a somewhat steady rate with peaks occurring, such as in California. If we can't meet the base demand plus peak at any point you can look for unrest from those most fickle, quite a lerge % of which consider themselves environmental advocates (read - "whiners") who live in the comfort of their homes with energy wasting computers and flat screen TVs and needless electronic devices.
I find them to be a spoiled lot. If you question my point of view...wait and watch.
Our best bet would be to electrify the pavement, and use internal combustion engines to move the last mile if we had to go electric. Why use roads at all? Maybe robotic vehicles on rails, but I don't know how we get there from here.
There are plenty of resources for power generation that aren't dependent upon others. This isn't a plan, this is stupidity, just like the bailout. You can't get out of debt by borrowing money.
Finally, this will fix the economy??? RIGHT!! Tax cuts will fix the economy. Getting the government OUT of our lives will fix the economy. The people of the world will fix the economy, not the flaming, stupid, inefficient, political governments of the world..
Not to mention all the water vapor (an large green house gas) it puts into the atmosphere.
Electric cars have about 1/10 the running costs compared to petrol. Electric cars can be charged using off peak power.
I have created a calculator to work out the cost comparison for your situation.
http://www.matthewb.id.au/media/Electric_Vehicle_Calculator.html
As for other energy efficiency measures. Regular houses can save $100s every year if efficiency is put in place. Businesses can save $1000s every year if efficiency is put in place.
I have made calculators for lighting
http://www.matthewb.id.au/media/Light_Energy_Calculator.html
Computing
http://www.matthewb.id.au/media/Computer_Energy_Calculator.html
Some changes can be applied for free.
This information is can be used to work out how much you can save before investing.
Regards
Matthew Bulat
http://www.matthewb.id.au/
Increase the taxes on gasoline so that it will be sold on the average at $4/gallon. We were used to it last summer, and so we should be able to survive that price.
The increased gas prices will keep all of our start-up alternative energy companies alive. The increased tax revenues:
1) Should be used to fund US automakers retool or increased production for the manufacture of Range Extended Plug-in Electric Vehicles or Plug-in electric Vehicles
2) Should be used in a rebate program to current drivers to give up their internal combustion engines in exchange for the electric vehicles, depending on income, so that the electric cars capable of freeway speed and have excellent electric mile range will become affordable to everybody. For example, people living below the poverty line should only pay 25% when buying these electric vehilces and 75% from the rebate program. Those in the median income and below should be subsidized 50%, and so on. This should put more than 1 million electric cars (plug-in, range extended included) in the market.]
3) Continue to fund the alternative energy research R&D
4) Continue to fund research that increases efficiency
5) fund any other sane projects to minimize use of fossil fuels of all kinds.
6) fund any other worthwhile project, such as those proposed by Amory Lovins and others.
This would have dramatic impacts on our importation of oil very quickly and have energy security for future generations. As a side effect, we will have more jobs, be in the leading edge, a better economy, cleaner air, to name a few.
-
by jennluby
December 8, 2008 7:27 PM PST
- check out the most energy efficient air conditioner in the world:
-
Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)http://www.coolerado.com