• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
December 4, 2008 2:12 PM PST

Laser printers don't emit harmful toner dust, study says

by Elsa Wenzel
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments

Tiny bits of toner wafting from laser printers can't be blamed for polluting indoor air, according to research released this week.

In 2007, a study from Queensland University of Technology in Australia suggested that breathing toner particles from printers could hurt the lungs as much cigarette smoke.

Researchers examined laser printer emissions in an enclosed area.

Researchers examined laser printer emissions in an enclosed area.

(Credit: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft)

But researchers from that school and the Fraunhofer Wilhelm Klauditz Institute in Germany have found no evidence to support that claim, after examining the makeup of chemicals released from laser printers.

They determined that such airborne materials include paraffins and silicon oils that evaporate when a printer's fixing unit, which attaches dry toner ink to paper, reaches temperatures as high as 428 degrees Fahrenheit.

"One essential property of these ultra-fine particles is their volatility, which indicates that we are not looking at toner dust," said Tunga Salthammer, a professor who worked on the study, in a statement.

The study did not describe how breathing in the ultra-fine chemicals could affect human health. However, volatile organic compounds are a major source of pollution indoors, where they are found in the air at levels up to 10 times higher than outdoors, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The nonprofit GreenGuard Environmental Institute offers a directory of electronics that emit relatively few of such chemicals, but that does not include printers. Last year's Australian study identified printer models with the highest emissions.

Add-on filters would do little to prevent printer emissions, according to researchers participating in the latest study, who noted that volatile organic substances are also released into the air from other household activities, such as toasting bread and cooking.

Printer makers belonging to the German Association for Information Technology partly funded the research.

German lawmakers plan to talk about the potential for laser printers to cause health problems at a meeting in January , according to Heise Online.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Powering cell phone towers with wind
Flywheels to buffer 20 megawatts on grid
Wi-Fi certification might be tweaked for smart grids
Students pitch green businesses for greenbacks
N.J. utility ups solar loans to $248 million
As alternative energy grows, NIMBY turns green
Kerry, U.N.'s Ban upbeat on climate prospects
iControl adds home energy services to broadband
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Joe Real December 4, 2008 5:18 PM PST
I have read elsewhere that Ozones are the major pollutants from laser printers. Ozone are formed when oxygen atoms are hit by lasers and also by the very hot filament wires of laser printers. Ozone is very bad for your lungs, skin, and can cause premature aging. It produces highly oxidative free radicals that can destroy tissues. Ozones, along with NOx's are also produced by internal combustion engines.

Why did they intentionally measure nor mention about ozone? I want to know if these are produced in negligble amounts in today's more advanced laser printers.
Reply to this comment
by OStrolphant December 4, 2008 6:53 PM PST
Where does it say they INTENTIONALLY excluded ozone?
by DarkHawke December 5, 2008 4:57 AM PST
Why does this article seem to promote more junk science than it debunks? Is "indoor air pollution" anything like that harmful outdoor air "pollutant," CO2 gas? Y'know, that horribly devastating emission that comes from, well, all living beings, including plants? You ask me, the worst pollutant on Earth are these reckless "studies" that imply causation from correlation so that their authors can get loads of government funding and the government can justify passing more and more laws, however ridiculous, that take away more and more of our hard-earned cash and liberty.
Reply to this comment
by clamenza December 5, 2008 9:13 AM PST
Right, because living beings generally burn up fossil fuel for energy.

Please turn off your computer and pick up the nearest clay tablet. Thank you.
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right