• On GameSpot: Super Street Fighter IV confirmed!
August 14, 2008 2:08 PM PDT

Solar cell breaks world record for efficiency

by Elsa Wenzel
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments

Department of Energy researchers claimed Wednesday to have broken the world record for efficiency in a solar cell.

Their cell converted 40.8 percent of light into electricity at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo. They subjected the cell to the equivalent concentrated light of 326 suns.

Researchers grew the solar cell upside down on a wafer of gallium arsenide rather than thick germanium, and then removed the wafer.

The development could lead to flexible, lightweight solar cells used in land-bound, concentrated photovoltaics as well as in space satellites.

The previous record for photovoltaic efficiency was 40.7 percent. Scientist Mark Wanlass is credited for leading that design. A key innovation in those multi-junction solar cells was to space their atoms at uneven intervals. Researcher John Geisz led the team that expanded Wanlass' work to improve efficiency.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Sun Catalytix secures money for low-cost solar fuel
Electric-car maker Tesla preparing IPO
What drives China? Soon, cleaner fuel
Will consumers plug into home energy displays?
Al Gore: Our next power grid will be like the Net
Recycling e-waste: Who should pay?
EV Project to showcase Nissan LEAF
Carbon nanotubes capture greenhouse gases, desalinate water
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by biznatch11 August 14, 2008 2:37 PM PDT
40.7% to 40.8%...really? Is that a typo or is 0.1% really a big deal when it comes to increasing solar cell efficiency?
Reply to this comment
by Joe Real August 14, 2008 2:51 PM PDT
"Their cell converted 40.8 percent of light into electricity at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo. They subjected the cell to the equivalent concentrated light of 326 suns."

What is the context of this statement?
What is the context of the efficiency quoted?

Is the efficiency based on the total energy output divided by the total solar energy intercepted by concentrator area? Or is this a bogus efficiency measure where the efficiency is based on energy output divided by just the active solar cell area?

Do we need to concentrate the light 326 times in order to push the efficiency to 40.8%? And is that 40.8% based on the total intercepted area of sunlight?
Reply to this comment
by russkeller August 14, 2008 2:55 PM PDT
Unless the difference is the new version is cheap to mass produce I don't see any reason to get excited. It's like the whole green tech industry is about status symbols and not actually bringing this stuff to market.
Reply to this comment
by Kichchi August 15, 2008 4:06 AM PDT
Yes. russkeller is correct. Until such time any green-tech is commercially produced at sold at affordable prices the people are not going to be benefited. For example there are said to be that many models have produced for hydrogen driven vehicles how many of them have come into the market for common use. Something like "Pickens Plan for wind Energy" must come in not only to save on oil fuel but also to "Save Mother Earth".
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right