• On TV.com: Sexy summer bodies photo gallery
August 12, 2008 11:37 AM PDT

T. Boone Pickens invests in natural gas-fueled taxis

by Stefanie Olsen

Betting on his new energy plan, oil mogul T. Boone Pickens has helped invest $160 million in a company that makes taxi cab fleets that run on natural gas, a cleaner burning fuel.

T. Boone Pickens

T. Boone Pickens

(Credit: Boonepickens.com)

Pickens, along with lead investor Perseus, a private equity bank, invested this week in Troy, Michigan-based Vehicle Production Group (VPG). VPG makes natural gas-fueled taxi cabs and consumer cars that are wheelchair accessible. Clean Energy Fuels Corp., which was founded by Pickens, is also an investor in VPG. The company said it plans to use the funds to further production of vehicles for release by early 2010.

Of course, natural gas cars are part of Pickens' energy plan, which he announced with much fanfare in early July. The so-called Pickens Plan calls for greater use of natural gas cars in the United States to reduce the country's dependence on foreign oil. Still, Pickens himself has been criticized for drawing up an energy plan based on his own investments.

Recent posts from Green Tech
Fisker's good Karma
Cleantech Group: Green investing sees uptick
Greenpeace guide frowns on HP, still loves Nokia
U.S. government maps solar energy future
Yahoo redesigns data center, ditches carbon offsets
New solar airplane unveiled in Switzerland
How green are you? Ecobot knows...
The greening of tech packaging
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by humanssssss August 12, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
Natural gas? It emits carbon. Electric car is the way to go. Zero carbon emission. Good for the environment.
Reply to this comment
by zagadget August 12, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
The greens fail to realize that tires, doors etc are made of carbon. The batteries that electrics run on can have dangerous chemicals in them. The power plants the "green electric cars " require are powered by Coal, Oil (carbon) - or Nuclear and in limited areas Hydro. Solar panels require energy to be fabricated and also can contain organics that are dangerous
Reply to this comment
by eddiemyboy1 August 13, 2008 8:00 PM PDT
We do realize that just about everything is carbon based on this planet,even us.The point is to reduce our carbon footprint as fast as possible.The point is to do something better than we have been doing.The point is to change and to improve on renewables and above all else to learn to conserve.
by infragod August 12, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
Oh come on....???? Like Al Gore's investement in the Carbon Credit pyramid scheme and the coordinated effort to enrich him by putting in carbon limits by congress isn't a conflict of interest.

At least Pickens is actually putting his money where his mouth is and creating energy which is real and will reduce Carbon at the same time. All Al Gore's strategy does is fleese business and individuals in a scheme which is akin to tossing a virgin into a volcano to appease the rain gods...

Wake up people. Pickens plan works great...and if you don't want to use natural gas...build more wind, nuclear, or Fischer-Troupe coal plants, whatever.
Reply to this comment
by eddiemyboy1 August 13, 2008 8:03 PM PDT
Pickens is an oilman,always has been,always will be.He wants to make money on renewables and get as big a piece of the pie as he can.He is not the noble altruistic person he is showing.SHOW ME THE MONEY!I do appreciate the PR and the push for renewables though.Get renewables in the forefront of our minds and get us going in the right direction.
by Manhattan2 August 12, 2008 1:06 PM PDT
If Mr. Pickens is reading this it is time to invest in a solar transfer solution or join the Manhattan 2 Project. Not selling anything yet. Just phase 1 of a 5 phase renewable energy program. Getting the information out about the mistakes of Ethanol, and errors in the design of residential fixed angle solar is phase 1.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy August 12, 2008 2:39 PM PDT
There goes the same Manhattan2 with the BS and hype of Solar Transfer. If you really want to go anywhere put out the details for all to see instead of just trolling the blogs.
Reply to this comment
by Ormond Otvos August 12, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
I have no objection to Pickens investing in non-carbon electricity. The EROI of wind is 24. The EROI of nuclear is 5. Natural gas is 5 and falling due to exhaustion. Coal is BOTH polluting and CO2 intensive. Pickens isn't talking about decreasing coal-fired electricity, as he should be. He's keeping his mouth shut, I suspect to avoid backlash from the enormously powerful Coal Lobby. More Wind is a Good Idea. Dump Coal until it is both clean and sequesters its carbon.
Reply to this comment
by PhyllisVance August 12, 2008 3:12 PM PDT
Electric cars may be carbon-free alternatives, but what about the need for speed? Pickens ideas have merit...but time will tell.
Reply to this comment
by jemiller0 August 12, 2008 9:05 PM PDT
If you are questioning how fast electric cars are, then, I think you need to do some research. Check this link out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqqtJpfZElQ&NR=1. An electric car blows away a Ferrari and a Porshe.
by vminvic August 12, 2008 9:57 PM PDT
Make that carbon-neutral bio waste gas and we have a deal. At what real cost, can this be done ? Permanently $6 per gal. gas equivalent ? Not cheap but same as now ! Gets rid of trash,compost, crop waste, and sewage - including animal **** ! Let's not forget the Animal Factories. Environment, and economy not now half fixed? Is this already economically viable when true cost accounting of all industrial/agricultural production is done? Bet it is. Just got to keep fuel prices where they are and we will fix this mess. Someone just decided to overhaul the distribution system anyways - T. Boone Pickens. Petro methane will get the ball rolling, and cut pollution in mean time. All autos on petro-methane still saves economic disaster anyways. Domestic supply exists!
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight August 13, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
Good effort.
Reply to this comment
by dw1949 August 13, 2008 1:06 PM PDT
reply to humanssss- You are right in that electricity is zero carbon emission, BUT the generation of electricity is far from carbon free- coal, oil and gas generation puts out tons of carbon.
Reply to this comment
by eddiemyboy1 August 13, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
I am for electric cars myself,but let us not forget that most of our electricity comes from coal fired plants and they are very dirty.Then you have nuclear power and I am just flat out against this monster that has the potential to destroy life on this planet or alter it until we won't want to live here anymore.
Reply to this comment
by elisnook August 20, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
Need for speed? Really? Electric cars can be very, very fast. In fact even faster than your currect car. Many people have this misconception about electric cars.
Reply to this comment
by anthonysmission August 20, 2008 2:18 PM PDT
Is anyone surprised to read this?

Anthony Kraudelt
3102 Lilac Haze Street
Las Vegas, NV 89147
Reply to this comment
by jabailo August 22, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
Hydrogen is the only fuel worth using.

Roll on, Hydrogen, roll on...!
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Making sense of Windows 7 upgrades

faq The basics and the fine print on Microsoft's options for those eyeing the next operating system from Redmond.
• Full Windows 7 coverage

Road Trip 2009: Big Sky Country

CNET News reporter Daniel Terdiman takes his car full of gadgets to the Rockies and the Great Plains in search of tech, science, nature, and more.
• America's Fortress: Cheyenne Mountain

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right