• On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
July 2, 2009 4:55 AM PDT

Microsoft 'mega data centers' to support Azure, Bing

by Matthew Broersma
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 12 comments

Microsoft on Wednesday launched a new data center in Dublin, describing it as the largest it has built outside the U.S.

The site is what Microsoft calls a "mega data center", a class the company has constructed previously only in the U.S. The company plans to open another mega data center in Chicago on July 20, it said in a blog post Monday.

Microsoft's Dublin data center

Microsoft's Dublin data center

(Credit: Microsoft)

Both new sites are intended to support Microsoft's online services, including its Azure hosted services and the recently introduced Bing search engine.

The Dublin facility covers 303,000 square feet, Arne Josefsberg, general manager of infrastructure services at Microsoft's Global Foundation Services, wrote in the blog post. It can provide 5.4 megawatts of power now, expandable to a total of 22.2 megawatts, he added.

Josefsberg said the building was constructed to take advantage of Ireland's cool climate.

"The facility makes extensive use of outside air economization to cool the facility year-round, resulting in greater power efficiency with a resultant reduction in carbon footprint," he wrote.

The Chicago facility covers more than 700,000 square feet, with 30 megawatts of power initially available, expandable up to 60 megawatts, Josefsberg said. Two-thirds of the facility is intended to house containerized servers -- shipping containers full of servers that can be cooled more efficiently than a conventional building.

The units can be made operational within hours, allowing quick expansion of capacity, and their server density can be more than 10 times that of a traditional data center, Josefsberg said.

Ray Ozzie, Microsoft's chief software architect, said recently that the growth of online services would lead to more data centers being built outside the U.S., citing the need for data centers "everywhere on Earth."

Matthew Broersma of ZDNet UK reported from London.

advertisement
advertisement
 
Business supplies and services can get expensive. Get smart spending tips and learn about new cost-saving opportunities for your business
Recent posts from Microsoft
Gates: Apple is 'a force in doing good things'
Hackers bypass Windows 7 activation
Microsoft: Windows 7 tool used GPL code
Dolly Parton endorses IE 8 Web Slices
Google says Docs to catch up to Office next year
Microsoft's new ad target: Windows 7
Office 2010 beta leaks early
Bill Gates' home tour on charity auction block
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by vincentyu2007 July 2, 2009 5:56 AM PDT
"It can provide 5.4 megawatts of power now, expandable to a total of 22.2 megawatts, he added. "
You mean it CONSUMES 5.4 megawatts of power, right? You make it sound like a power generation facility.
Reply to this comment
by Zer0Wolf July 2, 2009 6:23 AM PDT
No, I believe it means it can provide 5.4 MW maximum right now. You can consume as much as the equipment/devices running there.
This, can however, be expanded to 22.2 MW.
Ah, I just thought of an analogy now. A motherboard installed with 2GB of RAM can provide 2GB. If you have only a few applications open, you consume say 500MB. But 2GB is the max.
And this memory would be expandable to 4GB.
by wjsteele July 2, 2009 8:43 AM PDT
It basically is saying that the infrastructure in the building can support 5.4 megawatts of power to the equipment inside it. So, basically, the building is equipped to consume (or supply to computers) a maximum of 5.4 right now, which can be expanded to 22.2 later if needed.
by n3td3v July 2, 2009 6:52 AM PDT
Cloud infrastructure, FTW.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 July 2, 2009 8:52 AM PDT
Eh never seen a company so proud about how much power they can use...
Reply to this comment
by eadeguzman July 2, 2009 9:16 AM PDT
Not sure what's your point. Expressing the capacity of a data center in terms of mega watts of power is a good measure rather than just the square-footage which is also specified here. As a few readers commented here, it is maximum combined power of servers that can be plugged-in there. Just because it can supply that much, it doesn't mean they would.

The article also does not indicate where it's going to draw power from. It could be anything: nuclear power plant, biogas, etc...
by ncalishome July 2, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
eadeguzman is exactly right. Square footage means basically nothing if any of it is not built out yet. I've been in 3 or 4 large data centers in the SF bay area and most often there is loads of empty space waiting to be built out when needed.

Power capacity covers the backup infrastucture too.... Meaning they need to have enough generators on standby to keep this thing alive in case of a power failure. Walk out back of your typical data center and you'll find an impressive grid of huge diesel generators, and sometimes concrete slabs already poured and ready to drop another one on when they expand. This also means having fuel contracts in place to power these generators if there is there is an extended outage. It's not proud, it's prepared.
by viper396 July 2, 2009 10:36 AM PDT
Power consumption is one of the key deciding factors of any major datacenter. You simply don't build one without taking that into account. It's one of the reasons many companies are now choosing cooler regions since cooling is what consumes most of the power.
by Mr. Dee July 2, 2009 9:21 AM PDT
Surprised one is not being built in Alaska and Canada. Aren't those cold regions year round?
Reply to this comment
by 42istheanswer July 2, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
They're just moving closer to their globalist masters.
by viper396 July 2, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
Yes, they are cold regions but they lack either the infrastructure, accessibility, or commercial incentives to build there. Alaska isn't exactly the ideal spot for year round travel accesibility.
by wolivere July 2, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
Well lets see Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada. geographical center of North America, major rail and traffic hub. Larger city 700k +

Great network Infrastructure, but biggest Bonus. GOBS, and GOBS of cheap renewable power.

But can we also say Calgary? Lots of Economic incentive there, low tax's big city modern, gobs of connections home of one the Largest ISP's in Canada.

So.. hmm yes why not build more Mega Data Centers in either?
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

About Microsoft

Stay up-to-date on news centered in Redmond, Wash., from acquisitions to product updates to leadership developments.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Microsoft topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right