May 26, 2009 7:07 AM PDT

Does Microsoft's new LLC point to a search deal?

by Larry Dignan
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 7 comments

This was originally published at ZDNet's Between the Lines.

Microsoft last week registered a limited liability company (LLC) in Delaware, stoking speculation that it is planning an acquisition or joint venture. If true, Microsoft may be planning a little bit more than a demo of its search engine and a big ad campaign to promote it.

In a research report, Jeffries analyst Katherine Egbert wrote:

The software giant registered an LLC Corp. in Delaware last week, a move often made a week or two in advance of acquisitions or joint ventures. The registration gave rise to widespread speculation that Microsoft would acquire Citrix. While that's possible, the timing of the registration and recent debt raise indicate to us that it might be more likely Microsoft uses the LLC to form a partnership to boost the amount of traffic flowing through its search engine. It makes sense to us that Microsoft would want to address both the passive and active search markets simultaneously.

For what it's worth, an acquisition of Citrix would make much more business sense, but Microsoft's LLC move is likely to lead to a deal with Yahoo.

Regarding Egbert's passive comment:

Passive searches are performed via search toolbars embedded on popular sites, such as Yahoo's homepage or MSN, while active searches come via a user typing the search provider's URL into a browser e.g. google.com.

Egbert adds that a search engine move--perhaps that long-awaited deal with Yaho--would make sense. After all, Microsoft is going to blow $80 million to $100 million on advertising its "Bing" search engine in an attempt to garner users. It wouldn't hurt to pump some traffic through Bing to get things rolling.

Larry Dignan is editor in chief of ZDNet and editorial director of CNET's TechRepublic. He has covered the technology and financial-services industries since 1995.
advertisement
Recent posts from Microsoft
Job ad suggests Xbox Live headed for WinMo phones
Microsoft loses Word patent appeal, will change code
Microsoft CFO heads to new post at GM
Microsoft sued over Bing name
Visual Studio launch delayed by 'a few weeks'
Microsoft to fix Zune HD censoring issue
Plurk holding Microsoft's feet to code-copying fire
Windows 7 leaving Redmond's help desk less busy
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Vegaman_Dan May 26, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
Speculation is rampant. Nobody knows what this means at this point. There are no clues to really say anything at all.

Now that being said, buying Citrix would be financially positive but socially unpopular I think with the existing Citrix users. Citrix has a wonderful remote desktop service that works on all platforms wonderfully and is basically the business standard in the industry. I don't think the rabid Mac and Linux fans would like to see that happen to a product they use now. Citrix is big enough already to not need MSFT so far as I know, but that's limited to what I read online.

Yahoo search? Bing? To this date I have never understood the desire for MSFT to get into the search market. I know there is money to be made off the ads sold next to the results, but to really go after Google, they would have to reinvent the entire concept of search and that's just simply too daunting of a task I believe. Not without overcomplicating it to the point where it becomes unwieldy and unusable.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 26, 2009 8:37 PM PDT
Im all for competition in all markets. Do you really think Google would of unveiled new search features so soon if it wasn't for MS trying to step up the game?
by Aaron Kempf May 26, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
why would anyone be stupid enough to use citrix? windows terminal session gives like _ALL_ the benefits, without the $30,000 fees, right?
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan May 26, 2009 11:23 AM PDT
Windows Remote Desktop and Terminal Server do not connect with Macs or even the iPhone, whereas Citrix has several products that can, including GoToMyPC which works on Macs and iPhones to cross connect platforms.

They also offer meeting solutions software and other business suites that are attractive to enterprise customers.
by eadeguzman May 26, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
Hey Aaron, obviously, you have used Citrix MetaFrame... Are you able to manage access and feature-set of individual applications that users can use through terminal services from a web page? Users would just browse-through the web page for available apps, say MS Word, then launch only that application (as opposed to creating a new OS session) from a pool of servers.
by explorer5 May 26, 2009 11:14 AM PDT
Um, what's the LLC that Microsoft registered? Isn't that an important part of the whole story?
Reply to this comment
by Maclover1 May 26, 2009 8:47 PM PDT
eadeguzman TS 2008 now allows the publishing of applications. So to your point yes, you can launch just applications from a list.

That said Citrix has way more options, and it works on Linux and OS X. Citrix also owns Xen, a competitor to VMware and Hyper V. Citrix solutions usually cost more than plain TS. Not much though.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Microsoft

Stay up-to-date on news centered in Redmond, Wash., from acquisitions to product updates to leadership developments.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Microsoft topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right