Microsoft ditches old Hotmail design; users gripe
Yahoo and Google aren't the only ones whose Web site changes incur the wrath of users who'd rather things stay the way they were.
Microsoft is discontinuing an option to use Hotmail's older "classic" interface, merging it with a newer "full" design into a hybrid the company says is faster to use than both the predecessors. "With our new combined platform, we offer great performance in all markets by putting the best features from both versions in one well-designed platform. Because of these performance improvements it is no longer necessary to offer the classic version," the company said in a statement.
Matt Penttila was among those who was unhappy with the change when he lost his old Hotmail interface earlier this week. (More complaints are lodged at My Digital Life site.)
Hotmail users "can't differentiate between tabs and backgrounds because the background is the same color as the tabs, can't change the size of the columns to the left, can't read anything below 10 folders without scrolling down," Penttila said of the newer design. In addition, "read windows don't allow for scrolling side to side, just up and down, anything with graphics is automatically flagged as safe or unsafe and show gray boxes when the day before they were fine and showed with no problem," he said.
What peeved him most, though, was that he said Microsoft foisted the change on him. "They just did it without any warning or consent," he said.
Microsoft said there was indeed warning. "Hotmail customers were notified of these changes beginning in early September," the company said, before the changes started going live on September 22. "The team sent out e-mails and posted ads in advance, which highlighted the upcoming changes to the Windows Live Hotmail."
Also, Microsoft described the Hotmail overhaul rationale in an October blog post by Dick Craddock, Hotmail's group program manager.
It's hard to change heavily used sites. A 2001 Hotmail revamp triggered complaints, then a 2006 Hotmail redesign/a> caused enough problems that Microsoft reverted to classic mode by default.
Yahoo and Google have struggled with objections to redesigns of the Yahoo front page, the Flickr home page, and the iGoogle customizable start page.
Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank. 





95% of the time I try to do anything the browser hangs with the yellow "loading..." box displayed in the lower left corner. This forces me to use IE - ugh!!!!
My FF install is free of addons with the exception of YSlow.
In IE 7.0 it works as intended.
As someone that has used Hotmail since 96-97 (and see little reason to jump to gmail - the only competition) this is a big problem for me and one that has me considering a change in provider.
Regardless, I'm off beta and it still fails about 15% of the time with the same bug
Stopped using hotmail in 2001. Junk is the main problem, given that same junk keeps appearing in inbox over and over again, no matter how many times you indicate it is junk. Since gmail launches, been nothing but a happy customer.
I don't use Hotmail at all so I can't really say yay or nay on it.
gmail/yahoo mail (tied)
hotmail
.mac (This is utter crap for UI)
1)The reply window gets screwed up into a narrow column using Firefox (looks passable with IE).
2)The folders list is now too short and have to scroll
3) Still doesn't offer the ability to select/sort messages based on flags - read/unread etc.
4) Searching through mails is still pitiful.
Other problems persist - spam, unavailability, pre-mature logouts, etc. Overall, no improvements, just eye candy and actually lost a few features. Typical Microsoft.
Had been using Hotmail for more than a decade now (when it was not even Microsoft). Maybe its time to ditch it.
I've tried GMail on several occasions, but I *just cannot* get used to the interface. It's fast -- I'll grant them that -- but feels almost "toyish" to me, and very unnatural. Just my $.02, of course.
If I weren't happy with my Yahoo! Mail, though, I would probably switch back to the new Hotmail!
1) downgrade to using IE
2) waste 500 MB of RAM to start a WINE+IE everytime I want to check my e-mails
So many people have been trying to convince me to switch to Gmail for so long, but I always resisted... now I finally did and I'm truly happy with it so far. And I'm especially proud to have switched since I realized that Hotmail has blocked POP, IMAP and WebDAV in the past few months to trap their users, fearing the danger of losing too many users to Gmail and Yahoo! Mail (which have both become better than Hotmail). They know they are falling behind, and they didn't choose the way to face the threat.
I hope someone writes an app for that...
- by inachu November 7, 2008 5:34 AM PST
- thats what most software companies do when they take over things.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (44 Comments)Make it slow...... then change hardware then optimize new software to work just for that hardware to make the old desiign incompatible or slower.
This new stuff is just as fast as the old version was when it was still being hosted on linux when hotmail was sold to microsoft. I still wish to add *@microsoftsites to my apam rule but they prevent that. so now I hardly use their service.