Anonymous posts another video against Scientology

Editors' note, 11:00 a.m. PST: This blog has been condensed from an earlier version.
A group calling itself
The latest two-minute video from the group continues to use a computer-generated voice, stock video footage of the sky or neutral landscapes, and includes a fully transcribed text version. A voice over from the video says: "Contrary to the assumptions of the media, Anonymous is not 'a group of super hackers.'"
"Among our numbers you will find individuals from all walks of life--lawyers, parents, IT professionals, members of law enforcement, college students, veterinary technicians and more. Anonymous is everyone and everywhere. We have no leaders, no single entity directing us..."
In a separate e-mail to CNET, Anonymous said it is planning unspecified action on February 10 in such cities as New York, Montreal, Houston, London, Melbourne, and Los Angeles.
As CNET's resident security expert, Robert Vamosi has been interviewed on the BBC, CNN, MSNBC, and other outlets to share his knowledge about the latest online threats and to offer advice on personal and corporate security. Listen to his podcast at securitybites.cnet.com or e-mail Robert with your questions and comments.






Nice report otherwise, though.
They are extremely agressive and will try to hurt those who they thing are aligned against them.
Those that have things to hide do not enjoy being looked at.
T. Howell
You will only lead more people to find out what Scientology really is. The more it is attacked, the more people realize there must be something very good behind those walls. You must realize by now there are no skeletons in the church's closet.
But oh, I forgot we are dealing with morons who know everything. For Christ sake people, grow up and get a life. Kmart has some on sale real cheap.
http://www.partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology
http://partyvan.info.nyud.net/index.php/Project_Chanology
Learn to hack like a pro:
http://www.metasploit.com/confs/blackhat2007/tactical_paper.pdf
BackTrack3: Super Hardcore pentest distro!:
http://www.remote-exploit.org/backtrack_download.html
Anonymous greatly appreciates the support of CNET.
Anonymous would NOT target a news outlet which has given us so much help in getting our message out.
Given the very nature of Anonymous, there will always be idiots under our banner, as well as impersonators looking to discredit us -- don't let them fool you.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Thank you.
1781 Ridge Rd.,
Ontario, NY 14519
There is a school right across the steet so keep it tastful...we don't want to freak out the poor kids any more then they already are buy having the nut jobs across the street. Really people, this is a chance to really do something about this cult, as I have said before, they make radical Islamists look like a box of kittens. Educate your self, and if you do protest and they do come out and talk to you...DON'T BE ANONYMOUS, tell them your name and why you are there....just don't fall for their lies. They try to start files on people who protest them and mess with them...but if their black list suddenly has a million names on...then mabey they will understand we mean bussiness. This is a fight we can all be proud of....please get out there and do the right thing.
Tyranny knows no creed, no nationality, no race. It only knows the people who practice it.
As for religious intolerance, the CoS is the most intolerant force against Scientologists in the world. Most of Anon fully supports Free Zone and other Scientology groups that DO NOT require members complete life savings be turned over in order to learn the tennets of the religion, or sever ties with non-Scientologist family members. Research is your friend.
seriously i almost fell out of my chair at this.
Research is your friend.
Leave it to the big boys to take care of a worthy cause of bringing down a litigious, selfish, tax-exempt but business-wheeling "religious" organization. You should sit in the corner, and let ANON handle this, you big sissy.
hides its members' identities - Scientology brutally goes after
anyone who criticizes it.
Of course, I assume you know that... it's likely you yourself are a
Scientologist based on your comment.
Whats that you dont want to? Coward!
If you are a member of Cos, you would be far better off presenting evidence that refutes the claims of Anonymous. Please present evidence from a non CoS source. Please try not to use a Tautology for your argument.
I look forward to a logical and rational presentation from you.
Andreas Heldal-Lund says "I can prove that the cult hires private investigators to dig up dirt on me. They call people in my past (personal and professional) claiming they are journalists etc to find out if they reveal anything. They post anonymous accusations and insinuations on the Internet suggesting I am a sexual pervert and a terrorist. They send letters and call managers and directors in the company I work for to try to ruin me professionally. To me all this only confirms every reason why I protest this cult. I was prepared for this when I got involved as a critic.
The cult has made a page about me filled with lies. Their site about me is made by the Scientologist Joel Phillip. Phillips interviewed me twice on the street when I was in Los Angeles and you can watch it here on XenuTV.
You believe what you want, I can only ask you to check both sides before you decide to believe them or me" (www.xenu.net)
The BBC tried to interview scientologists, and what did they get for their efforts for fair reporting? Calls from the scientologists to the police saying the BBC had placed "terrorists death threats" to scientologists, that they had staged exhibitions outside the scientologists' offices, and handed out flyers about John Sweeney, the BBC reporter saying he was a pervert.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_6650000/newsid_6651700/6651721.stm?bw=nb&mp=wm&news=1&ms3=6&ms_javascript=true&bbcws=2 The video link is also on www.xenu.net
Another British special (on youtube, but link not specified) talks of an ex-scientologist that fears for his life and the safety of his family. Everytime a woman is raped, a person murdered, the scientologists call the police claiming this ex-member is the culprit.
I COULD go on. if you want to know more of the atrocities scientologists are capable of, and have commited, visit such sites as www.whyaretheydead.net which has affidavits from cases, news releases from credible agencies that document the activities.
This corporation (for it is more that than anything else), as stated int he BBC segment, CANNOT take criticism of itself. It will not tolerate it and it will go to ANY lengths to squash any negative information about it. This is censorship. It is illegal. Look up "Operation Snow White" if you don't believe me. Even Hubbard's wife was convicted for breaking into government offices(not just US offices either) to steal and destroy any evidence of corruption or fraud (for either the "church of scientology" or L. Ron Hubbard)
A British newspaper
Jason M HALwick
I have the greatest respect for the members of Anonymous. If you take the high path and Force the Scientologists to rake the muck. They will destroy there own reputations.
PS. Anonymous is correct in not giving out there names. CoS is known for harassing people who disagree with them.
To begin I want to say that I am not interested in debating the merits or shortcomings of Scientology. There are certainly enough opinions expressed both for and against that I don?t feel the need to weigh in on this particular subject.
Setting aside for the moment that the actions undertaken by these individuals are clearly illegal, consider for a moment that what these individuals are attempting to do is to set themselves above the law by attacking Scientology web sites through use of denial of service attacks, hacking and defacing Church run or sponsored web sites.
They obviously have little regard for the duly constituted legal system in this Country that has been put in place to redress wrongs committed against its citizens.
They are offended that Scientology has invoked its right to prevent the release of copyrighted material from being freely distributed across the internet and has taken steps in its own behalf through the courts to uphold these rights.
No doubt these same self serving individuals were just as deeply offended by the actions of the recording and movie industries to litigate against the unauthorized copying and distribution of music and video content across the internet as they no doubt felt that their First Amendment rights were being abridged by these scurrilous profit making enterprises.
Of course they have a harder time making that argument and justifying their attacks now because it has already been established in the courts that the unauthorized distribution of copy-righted music and video is not covered by the First Amendment.
Instead they make the argument that through the courts the Church of Scientology has attempted to stifle dissent or debate about its beliefs and practices and therefore they must for the good of all attack this religion and shut it down.
This is a baseless argument as frankly anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of the internet can find page after page of material critical of the Church written both by former member and non-members alike. Therefore it is reasonable to state that Scientology has not in fact stifled dissent or criticism but has taken action when copyrighted material has been published or posted without its authorization.
I personally don?t have an issue with critics or detractors of Scientology. My issue is when individuals use illegal means to disrupt or attack my religion that I feel compelled to speak out.
Protest if you like, write your congressman, take out full page ads if you?re so inclined. I would be even be happy to debate the subject with you if you are so inclined and at the end I would shake your hand and we can respectfully agree to disagree.
Where and when Church members have broken the law they have paid a price. The cases are few and far between but they have occurred. I don?t condone their actions nor would I support those that break the law, just as I don?t support the criminal activities of Anonymous.
In order to counter the deceptions of COS the "Technologies" must be published. defacing a website is going a bit to far (please note that the official policies of the CoS including things like the fair game doctrine are far worse than messing up a website for a few minutes).
Lisa Mcpherson.
Then again, logic and reason isn't exactly winning over in getting people to "believe" in the science of evolution, so maybe I'm overly optimistic on this one.
As for Anonymous, somebody's got to learn to let go of their Thetons.
I have 6 volumes of Hubbard's Mission Earth, missing volumes 1 to 4. Can anybody help me to get those missing volumes?
Vol 1 - The Invaders Plan
Vol 2 - Black Genesis
Vol 3 - The Enemy Within
Vol 4 - An Alien Affair
Must be hardbacks published by New Era Publications UK Ltd. Sorry, not interested in paperbacks (soft cover).
I think Hubbard's scifi writings finally got to him which resulted in CoS.
"We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Thank you."
It sounds like dialogue from a really bad 50's sci-fi movie.
I'm not sure who is the biggest idiot here, COS or this yahoo writing this childish dribble.
Let them use their free speech, heck, Scientology has abused so many rights that someone needs to take them on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOXx2p12x4o
the Boot" premiers. Will this day of action be better than that ?
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/
I think "Anonymous" is wasting their time. I studied both Scientology (by reading two of their books at a library) and I am very familiar with
the Catholic faith (I even attended Parochial Schools, but I am NOT catholic), and my answer?
Stay away from both of them! I don't know what your answer will be, but fanatics and vigilantes I don't need..
Still, though, the ONLY thing that is horrible is BOTH of the above religions can't take any criticism, and they don't want to seem to come clean and be honest. Maybe it's about time they get a taste of their own medicine.. As long as "Anonymous" doesn't go overboard, I would love to see what they have in mind. And As for the prosecution by Scientologists, that is SSOOO LAME!
But anyway... The reason the group was started was because of how the CoS' powerful legal team covers up material that speaks out against Scientology, or shows it in a unfavorable manor. (Tom Cruise Video)
- Anonymous
-
by rurouni79
January 29, 2008 7:26 PM PST
- only a nameless bodiless entity can stand a chance against a
-
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (117 Comments)nameless, bodiless entity. Anonymous has my full support.