• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
January 26, 2008 2:59 PM PST

Church of Scientology responds to Internet attacks

by Robert Vamosi

After several days of Internet attacks by a group calling itself Anonymous, the Church of Scientology has responded with a comment about the posting of one of its videos. A response on Friday evening from the Church of Scientology did not address CNET News.com's specific request for comment on the denial-of-service attacks themselves. Instead, Karin Pouw, public affairs director for the Church of Scientology, focused on the leak of a Tom Cruise video on YouTube earlier in the week. The response reads, in full:

As the Church previously announced, the pirated and edited excerpts of Mr. Cruise were contained in an official Church event in 2004, an event attended by 5,000 Scientologists and their guests and further available for viewing in any Church of Scientology world over. Having presented these selective and out-of-context excerpts with the intent of creating both controversy and ridicule, nevertheless resulted in people searching for and visiting Church of Scientology Web sites as evidenced by "most searched for" lists of various search engines. Those wishing to find out the Church of Scientology's views and to gain context of the video have the right to search official Church Web sites if they so desire.

As CNET's resident security expert, Robert Vamosi has been interviewed on the BBC, CNN, MSNBC, and other outlets to share his knowledge about the latest online threats and to offer advice on personal and corporate security. Listen to his podcast at securitybites.cnet.com or e-mail Robert with your questions and comments.
advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from Defense in Depth
Window Snyder to leave Mozilla
How to handle ID fraud's youngest victims
Is white listing going mainstream?
How Live OneCare changed the antivirus landscape
Express Scripts clients threatened with extortion
Study: DDoS attacks threaten ISP infrastructure
Security expert talks Russian gangs, botnets
Extortion used in Express Scripts database breach
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (129 Comments)
Irrelevant, ignorant morons.....
by aaydogan January 26, 2008 4:44 PM PST
and those are just the leaders. Can you imagine what the followers
must be like? Though the same can be said of every religion.
NOthing but mumbo jumbo for the scared ignorant masses. Wake
up and live!
Reply to this comment
Human rights
by grahamesd January 27, 2008 12:32 PM PST
I guess you've never heard of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? You know that minor, unimportant document that allows us freedoms such as your right to write what you just wrote? Remember it? The one that gives you the right to believe or not believe as you choose.

Deny anyone the right to believe as they wish and you deny yourself that right.
View reply
Harsh mistress
by nicmart January 27, 2008 3:47 PM PST
While I'm an atheist, I hardly think that everyone from James
Madison to Aristotle was an idiot. Belief in religion is a poor litmus
test of wisdom or intelligence; and tolerance is a greater virtue
than intelligence.
View all 2 replies
Yep
by wildchild_plasma_gyro January 29, 2008 2:52 AM PST
Wouldent it be nice if it was done more symbolically advanced and a lot less based on deception.
What say a civilisation and not just a political system.
Well we can but dream.
In defense
by nicmart January 26, 2008 4:53 PM PST
I'm a life-long atheist who agrees that all religions are equally silly.
That said, a person has the right to worship his religion without
interference or persecution, and the attacks on Scientology are
disturbing. Even individualistic atheists should stand forthrightly
against religious persecution and in defense of freedom of
conscience. Scientology is a minority religion which offends many,
and so is in special need of protection for attacks, online and
offline. Scoff at Scientologists, but protect their rights.
Reply to this comment
Not a religion
by MaLvaDo39 January 26, 2008 6:55 PM PST
...that's why it's dangerous and a cult.
View all 4 replies
however...
by Jortibereal January 26, 2008 6:59 PM PST
I agree that religious minorities especially need to have their rights protected, but it is arguable whether Scientology is a religion or, rather, a cult. In my opinion, a cult does not deserve the same protections that a religious group does. Historically, cults are dangerous bodies (Jim Jones, etc.)
View reply
But why?
by demner January 26, 2008 8:03 PM PST
If a religion is ridiculous and has downright stupid beliefs, why shouldn't we attack it? As a lifelong atheist, don't you think a world with no religion would be a better place?
View reply
Mistaken motives
by chrizkatore January 26, 2008 8:14 PM PST
I, also, am an atheist, who finds Scientology's beliefs to be no more ridiculous than that of many "mainstream" religions. However, you have mistaken the motives behind the attacks on the Church of Scientology.

Few people have any problem with the body of beliefs that encompass Scientology. Sure, it's been ridiculed by the media and pop culture a lot recently, but that's not what any of this is about.

Scientology as a belief system isn't a problem; it's nothing we haven't seen before. The Church of Scientology, on the other hand, is a dangerous existence that deserves no less than to be wiped off this planet for good. To consider it anything more than a stealing, murdering cult would be putting it in a far greater light than its past would indicate.

So, just to clarify: Scientology isn't being attacked because it's a strange belief. It's being attacked because it is a dangerous organization, and its members are robbed of both their money and their freedom.
View reply
Nobody is denying anyone their rights
by Andy kaufman January 26, 2008 9:32 PM PST
I fully support Tom Cruise's choice of religion and what he has to say. Even if I am not a Scientologist.

But you want to protect Scientology from attacks, you must also protect other religions from attacks as well. Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Wicca, Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Confusciousim, and Shintoism need to be protected as well. So do other religions that I haven't mentioned here.

If you are an atheist who agrees on that point of view, then you must condemn other atheists who attack religions like Richard Dawkins attacking many religions with his books like "The God Delusion" and Phillip Pullman's "His Dark Materials" being made into "The Golden Compass" which attacks religions and is marketed towards children. Both books persecute various religions and attacks them as well.
View all 2 replies
You comment is stupid, read why
by Anon711 January 26, 2008 10:51 PM PST
you seem to think this is a persecution of their religion, you are wrong. we do not care what you believe in, we do not even care that you are a scientologist. you are unimportant, so deflate your head and step off your pedestal because this isn't about you. this is about control and abuse and freedom and a scam that has been going on for too long.

if you had any idea of how much money the church makes. if you knew how it was generated, you would not stand and go "they need special protection" if you think they are a minority, then deflate your head again. if you think they need special attention, then deflate yourself yet again.

do not spew **** on a canvas. understand the terms or risk saying something stupid. i don't think i need to point you anywhere as the information is readily available...

oh wait,
http://www.711chan.com/
guess not.
View all 4 replies
re: In defense
by Red_Pi11 January 27, 2008 11:23 AM PST
As a fellow life long atheist, I do agree that people should be free to believe in their religion without fear of persecution. However, as a critic of the Church of Scientology I need to tell you that Scientology is not a religion, and my interest lies in prosecution more than persecution. I don't care that they believe in Xenu because people believe in all kinds of silly things. I'm involved because Scientology is a ruthless mafia racket designed to swindle people out everything they could ever earn or barrow. There's just no way I could convey the degree dishonesty, ruthlessness and evil in a little box like this. Be good to yourself, read up on these guys and you'll see why people oppose them so strongly.
You said it
by grahamesd January 27, 2008 12:23 PM PST
Today it's Scientologists tomorrow who?
It's about what they do, not what they believe
by Theodore Q January 27, 2008 7:11 PM PST
I have no objection to the, shall we say, unusual beliefs of Scientologists. However, the methods they use to silence their critics are often objectionable or even illegal. I suggest you google for "Operation Freakout," or read about any of the other times they have harassed and threatened reporters. Absolutely they have the right to believe anything they want; but much of the "persecution" you refer to is due to things they've done, not the things they believe.
But then again..
by JollyRanger January 29, 2008 8:31 PM PST
Whose rights do they protect? None. they take advantage of everyone who falls into their clutches. They prey on the lonely, weak, sick, the needy. They take them for all they have. People "give" the church (or as one scientologists states in this very forum "pays for services rendered") THOUSANDS of dollars, but die with less than $200 dollars to their name. "Operation Freakout" and "Operation Snow White" show the scientologist's flagrant disregard for the laws(that provide and protect the very rights you speak of in this country) in attempts to physically maim people until they cease their (free speech right) criticism of CoS, and to infiltrait US and other countries governmental offices and destroy (successfully) documents detailing the fraud and corruption of CoS.
This does not sound like a "right" to me. It sounds like they are getting away with everything from lying to fraud to murder.

www.whyaretheydead.net
www.xenu.net
Xenu speaks
by savvydude January 26, 2008 5:22 PM PST
Funny how the Scientologists are spinning Tom Cruise's
revealing, new manta. He can now control time, matter and
space, jut like the God of the Bible. Problem is, he couldn't
control the unwanted release of the video where he explained
his new self-made, god-like status. Heck fire, if he couldn't
even keep that from happening, how could he ever fix all of our
problems (like he promised in the video)?

I guess we'll just have to shop around for a new Messiah.
Madonna the Kabbolah, anyone?
Reply to this comment
ROTFL!
by Penguinisto January 28, 2008 9:33 AM PST
[i]"Funny how the Scientologists are spinning Tom Cruise's revealing, new manta. He can now control time, matter and space, jut like the God of the Bible."[/i]

Too bad he can't act...

/P
Anonymous
by AgentOrangeJuice January 26, 2008 8:57 PM PST
Keep this in mind: the cult of $cientology are expert brainwashers. Chances are there are spies amongst us now, even as we post. Arguing who is who on an anonymous image-board is completely inane. However, posting threatening comments, suggesting terroristic actions and subversive tactics against the super-****** celebrities involved in this murderous pyramid scheme will create a vast entity of horrible possibilities for these useless *********.
Reply to this comment
The opiate of the masses
by Lenter101 January 26, 2008 8:59 PM PST
Regardless of what name you give it, religion exists on every level in human culture and experience. Most of the beliefs are based of faith or want, a want that makes the believer feel better about themselves, makes them feel special, makes them feel reassured about the outcome.

The two great unknowns that all humans must address are, 1.) where did we come from and 2.) what happens to us when we die.

The Old Testament and the New Testament in modern religion.

But there are hundreds of similar interpretations of these two mysteries in all human cultures, from the very earliest to modern times.

Man is an animal that would rather believe a lie than say I don't know. Example, ancient cultures made up beautiful, but totally wrong, stories of what the stars represented. Ptolemy presented a incredible and plausible explanation of the movement of the planets and stars, only it was wrong. That didn't stop people and institutions, like the Catholic Church, from embracing it for 1400 years. It didn't stop the powers of the day, the Catholic Church, from murdering thousands of innocents who disagreed. It didn't stop Pope Maffeo Barberini from placing Gallileo under house arrest for writing a book in support of Copernicus.

No, superstition when widely embraced leads to power and power in men corrupts. Times past it was the Pharoahs, the Roman leaders, the Catholic Church, Adolph Hitler, and now it is the regional killers and murders of innocents.

Below this, on a smaller scale is the embrace of ideation of corporate leaders and their services, of presidents and their policies, of religionist and their causes - of politically motivated ideologies that create the facts to push their causes.

It's an inherent flaw in humans that allows us to be so easily influenced by ideology.

In the end there are two problems that face us all. My mentor Jacob Bronowski said it best when he wrote, " There are just two parts to the human delimma. One is the belief that the end jutifies the means. That push button philosophy, that deliberate deafness to suffering, has become the monster in the war machine. The other is the betrayal of the human spirit: the assertion of dogma that closes the mind, and turns a nation, a civilisation, into a regimen of ghosts - obedient ghosts, or tourtured ghosts."

All religions - formal or not - assert dogma and therefore turn their followers into robots, void of freewill and the ability of critical analysis. This to me is the problem of L. Ron Hubbard and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez and all the zealots throughout history who have manipulated prople with their dogma and phony promises.

I see no difference between the Scientologist or the Anon's attacking them. Looks like a turf war to me. I see no difference between the Applelites who embrace all things Apple while putting down all things Microsoft. I see no difference in the religious embrace of global warming by people who want to think it is the end of the world and use filtered data to support their cause. The end justifies the means. WE WANT ALL PEOPLE TO THINK OUR WAY. Anything else is DENIAL.

Somewhere along the way, for complex reasons, these people lose the ability to make critical analysis of data and live in the closed world of their own minds.

Like religionists throughout history.

Me, I'll embrace science and questions and an open mind.
Reply to this comment
Time For An Atheist President
by Stating January 26, 2008 11:13 PM PST
The absurdity of religion is exemplified in the current race for President. The candidates are falling all over themselves trying to "out religion" each other. Have you seen how many photo-ops are in churches? Are any of them trying to "out science" each other? Heck no, that would require fact based campaiging, which is the antithesis of politics. Much better to talk about faith than a $9.2 trillion dollar debt or $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities. God will surely deliver us from fiscal irresponsibility. "And then a miracle occurred.".
Anonymous v CoS
by AlchemicalOne January 26, 2008 9:57 PM PST
Anonymous isn't targetting the Church of Scientology due to their beliefs. It is how they handle things, they hide their documents, supposedly murder those that leave or leak information, and require membership to even access these documents. It would be like the Catholic Church not telling you what they are about until you've paid and joined them. Through this method the Church of Scientology denies freedom of religion by having you join without knowing what you joined. The Church is also just a scam for money, Hubbard created it for that reason.

As for what Anonymous is doing, I don't fully agree with the DDoS attacks, but I would like to see some more of the Church's "valuable" information.
Reply to this comment
Silly
by nicmart January 27, 2008 3:44 PM PST
This is paranoid nonsense. All people who become adherents to
Scientology do so voluntarily. If they want to join an organization
that doesn't share documents, that is their business. Note how this
person says that Scientologists "supposedly murder." Either they
do, and there is evidence, or they do not. With no evidence you
are spreading the most insidious lies, not much different than
claiming that Jews poison wells. The entire anti-Scientology
campaign has echoes of anti-Semitism.
Re: Opiate of the Masses
by enovikoff January 26, 2008 10:16 PM PST
It must make you feel quite superior to claim that you're going to "embrace science and the open mind." The problem is, that this superiority will keep you from ever seeing if you are falling into the same ego-trap that we see the Scientologists falling into. Cruise isn't raving in this video to get us to fear, revile, or put down Scientology: he's here to show us that we are all the same, that our own sense of inadequacy, our lack of understanding of why we're here, our inability to understand why we're not happy... these are our downfall. Whether we embrace Scientology or Science or Religion, it is the embrace itself that keeps us from knowing ourselves and the answers to these questions. Can you truly claim that there is no part of you that is smug and righteous about "knowing you have it all figured out?" In Steve Taylor's excellent book, "The Fall", he proposes that it's our ego, with its constant need to survive and be right, that creates religion. Can you claim not to have that going on in your psyche?

I personally see Cruise as a helpless, lost being frantically trying to avoid feeling the roaring emptiness that rages inside. He deserves compassion and respect as a teacher to us all of what that avoidance can lead to.
Reply to this comment
What's the fuss about?
by cowardshide January 26, 2008 10:38 PM PST
I went to several Scientology web sites and think that what it has
to offer is very much needed in our world. They do a lot of good
things. I remember reading something in the Katrina news too
about Scientology crews there and John Travolta going around in
a boat to help. I have a lot of respect for John Travolta and
personally am moved by Tom Cruz's passion for what he believes
in. I did notice that no matter how angry they become in their
subject of passion, they don't lower themselves to the level you
have permitted yourselves to sink. But then that is likely normal
ops for you in daily life. You guys are a bunch of bored
computer nerds with too much time on your hands. I don't care
how far fetched a religion seems or how passionate the
members. But what I read so far was positive and actually quiet
admirable. I found a personality test on one of the sites. I'm
tired tonight but I'm going to take it tomorrow. Interesting. Back
off and get a life okay?
Reply to this comment
what's hiding beneath
by purple124 January 27, 2008 12:55 AM PST
Scientology first starts out as a self help program (a very good one at that as you can pay or work to have a series of one-on-one auditing (counselling) sessions). It's what happens in the later stages that is the problem.

It makes a huge ammount of money and it seems like it will do anything to protect it's salary. In the 70s several of it's prominent members were trialed and found guilty of burglary, felony trespassing, racketeering, espionage against the USA, and assorted high crimes. Never for murder but there have been many trials against them that have failed (many will say due to the CoS having one of the best legal teams in the world). If you compare it to other religions seedy pasts, it might not seem to bad. But I can leave the catholic church and no-one knows. It is not easy to leave CoS. According to the church's own documents they have the right to do what they want to it's disobedient members and those who stand in it's way. It depends then on how each branch of the church decides to enforce this. Some won't, but many unfortunately will.

Some people who join the organisation never ever have a problem with it. These people all have one thing in common: they can afford it, and they don't have kids who are born with a condition that the church isn't able to handle with their methods

If you want to see how ugly the Church can get visit this site:

http://www.xenu.net/archive/personal_story/paulette_cooper/

or for as much as you can read:

http://www.xenu.net/
View reply
How dare you...
by MisterThropic January 27, 2008 4:13 AM PST
Don't go pulling that 'I've been to a few websites and some meetings' garbage. That little ditty about psychiatry that you did sounded like it was pulled directly from a Scientologist manifesto. I think you're a member of their cult or at least want to be. Furthermore, quit threatening people with: "In fact, what you are doing is VERY dangerous - and illegal." or "You attack illegally and could find yourself in prison..." That's also makes you sound like a member or worse, some type of CoS stooge. You call yourself, 'cowardshide' and yet you are hiding behind the anonymity of the internet like all of us. And why would you insult the folks on this site by calling them "bored computer nerd"? You should be ashamed. What you defend (and may be involved in) you cannot understand. But rest assured you may have the displeasure of discovering one day. Because what you are in or may join is dangerous for you. I am NOT saying that as a personal threat towards you. Having had a sibling formally in that cult, I have personally dealt with what happens when people try to leave it. My family had to deal with legal issues, threats and confrontations - physical and verbal, because someone dared to leave and speak out against them. So ofcourse, the CoS accuses everyone who has left and spoken about them as disgruntled and are more than happy to sue to shut them up about their operation. And yes, they do excellent charity work. But all the good deeds in the world can't make amends for what they have done to others in the past and what they will do to those in the years to come. I will not for one moment pretend I know what the CoS organization is really about. I don't know if its just something as simple and base as a giant money scheme, a desire to control others or if there is some other more sinister purpose driving it. And all the studying in the world will not afford anyone some kind of great insight into the truth of the matter. The only way to truly know would be sitting as a high status church leader. I have no issue with low level members. They are just people seeking something to make their lives better. But they become trapped. Many times without realizing it, until they try to leave or speak against or disclose what they've experienced. I have issues with their upper ranks and leadership. Who will stop at nothing to complete whatever agenda they have. So if you're thinking of joining: do not under any circumstance do so. If you've all ready joined: Get Out Now! Finally, if you're some type of Scientologist plant or recruiter, put on this site to defend the cult and sell people on it being benevolent and something worth trying out... Well... if thats the case, you have a clear idea of what I think of you and where you can go.
re: What's the fuss about?
by Red_Pi11 January 27, 2008 10:56 AM PST
Nice try Cowardshide. How, are you going to admit that you're a Scientologist, or do we have to play the tired old game where you deny the obvious? Katrina? You must be referring the Vulture Ministers, who swoop in at disasters to provide 'touch assists' and hand out copies of the Way to Happiness booklet. Hurricane victims obviously don't need things like food, shelter, clean water, fresh clothes, right? They have their little WTH pamphlets, so what are they complaining about?

Tom Cruise is a nut. He proved that in late 2005 when he jumped on Oprahs couch and famously said Matt Lauer 'Here's the problem. You don't know the history of psychiatry, I do.' His latest video, which OSA tried to suppress as usual, dragged Scientology kicking and screaming back into the light. And this time the SP's he made back in 2005 were ready for the publicity. By the way, what do you think about Andrew Mortons new book, that OSA also tried to suppress? Its #1 on Amazon.
View reply
They consistantly
by krosavcheg January 27, 2008 7:00 PM PST
tried to vandalise any Wikipedia articles that were critical to Scientology. They tried to make up reasons to remove the orginal Scientologist message board. They have looked for ANY reason to remove sites critical of them on the internet.

They try and Censor every negative thing possible about them. Is that fair?

Anonymous is simply returning the favor.
The fuss
by Phillep_H January 29, 2008 1:59 PM PST
Go to the web sites that discuss the internal workings of the CoS, and how they've hounded people who disagree with them. The lawsuits, the unexplained deaths, the casting out, etc.

They are a really nasty bunch to have on your tail.
If the excerpts available online are "out of context"....
by Another Surfer January 26, 2008 11:08 PM PST
then the scientology corporation should absolutlely release the video in question to the public, via the internet.

I have seen 40 minutes at least of this video, and believe me, I got the context.

I am VERY concerned.

And all the more so based on the further context of this event (an account of a 2007 scientology gathering and a presentation entitled "The Global Obliteration of Psychiatry": http://www.xenu-directory.net/topics/miscavige-vs-psychiatry.html

"An insider provided pictures of the Church of Scientology 2007 New Year's event: images of an exploding grenade are associated with the Church of Scientology's campaign for the 'Global Obliteration of Psychiatry.'"

I challenge the corporation of scientology to release the Award Ceremony video featuring Tom Cruise in its entirety.

We would ALL appreciate the opportunity to see it.

Sincerely,

Another Surfer
Reply to this comment
suspicious concern there...
by cowardshide January 26, 2008 11:36 PM PST
What are you 'concerned' about - psychiatry going down or a
symbolic grenade blowing them up. Whether it's done with a
grenade, atom bomb or their own drugs and shock, they need to
go. i recall some bombs going off in the anti-abortion war and
so far i haven't heard of Scientology doing anything illegal to
obliterate psychiatry. I've seen the same symbolism used to
illustrate getting dirt out in a laundry ad too. You're trying to
make people think Scientology my use a granade when you
know it's symbolic. Your like the media or the psychiatrists
themselves - using false sensationalism to form public opinion
against them. But there is documentation on the history,
murders, suicides, overdrugging, voting mental illness into the
books, and much more. This isn't new news. I work with
thousands of parents who are hearinig about the fraud, false
studies, suicides, side effects, rapes, unhumane
experimentation, and even murder by the millions all i the
hands of psychiatry. have you visited their museum with
documentation of everything they say? Or, are you yourself, a
psychiatrist? All of this propaganda is a huge effort to shut
Scientology up because it is exposing psychiatry for what it
really is. It's not a little bug in their fur anymore. They tried to
make laws to force kids on drugs with the teachers say so
against the parent's consent. They've tried every single year to
get this passed into law but Scientology's CCHR has stopped
them. And people don't know they're protecting them but they're
finding out now. It's a new day coming where all religions,
families, schools, nursing homes, special needs children, and
stressed people can live in peace. You think this church makes
money? Have you checked the figures for Prozac, Ritalin, and all
the dangerous drugs? Each makes more than the Church. They
don't want to lose that and Scientology is the only group really
standing up to them. That's why the attacks. Visit CCHR.org and
get documentation on everything I say and more. They make
sure they can back up their accusations. You can go see them
anytime.
View all 2 replies
Scientology repeats its lies, or adds to these.
by roger gonnet January 27, 2008 12:21 AM PST
I wonder how the "church" of scientology, whose Hubbard founder was convicted to 4 years unsuspended for fraud and extortion linked to scientology, in Paris Courts, 1978, keeps on hiding even its own stars' rants about the cult.
If people heard what David Miscavige, the scientology "Reichsführer",says or does to the cult, that could be still more incredible.
PS: Hubbard did not appeal the ruling...
Reply to this comment
Anonymous could be anyone, including Scientology
by CarolineLetkeman January 27, 2008 6:46 AM PST
This may of course not even be an external attack by a separate group.

Let's not forget that covert Scientology operatives mailed their own bomb threat into their own "religious" organization to get law enforcement to go after Paulette Cooper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulette_Cooper

The Scientology cultists run by cult head David Miscavige will do anything and they'll say anything. They would want the "suppressive persons" they target to look really bad.

Tom Cruise of course wants SPs looking bad. He wants a world without us people who stand up to the Scientology madness.

Don't forget too Miscavige's "Loyalist" operation, where he had his own personnel pretend to be disaffected Scientologists who wanted to reform the cult and even get Miscavige jailed for his crimes.
http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/illegal-videotaping.html
Reply to this comment
Still Missing a Major Point
by knack4 January 27, 2008 7:41 AM PST
Whatever it is the Scienologists do, I hadn't heard anything to suggest they engage in random Net-Terrorism such as these Anonymous clowns do.

The moronic media, ever in search of a Big Story, have raised these not-particularly-skilled hacker-vandals to a level they don't even vaguely merit.

They've been committing essentially criminal acts against more or less random targets for some time now, and have accomplished nothing whatsoever - unless it is to show that all too many people will overlook criminal behavior in favor of their own prejudices.

The flood attacks are accomplished using deliberately compromised computers belonging to innocent people. The nasty characters who run these botnets intrude into the machines and lives of thousands of people. Their malware gives them comprehensive access to the systems they've invaded, and they can be consistently counted upon to USE that access to do senseless mischief and to profit criminally. I see it almost daily in my work, these guys do DAMAGE, and LOTS of it.

The scientologists couldn't possibly be doing the Net as much harm as these botnet-wielding lowlifes. Buy a clue, people! Don't give them the smallest break. Whoever you want to crusade for or against, do it LEGALLY and with some semblance of style and grace. Reject these detestable thugs and their destructive tactics COMPLETELY. They contribute nothing to the dialogue but chaos.
Reply to this comment
Hey, be nice
by zombie4 January 27, 2008 8:41 AM PST
Please stop picking on TomKat and his (church?) sic. You want to come to your home ,jump on your sofa and cured you?
Reply to this comment
Who cares?
by asokol1 January 27, 2008 9:06 AM PST
Who cares about The COS? No one else seems to care about any other forms of mental illness.
Reply to this comment
One other point missed
by perfectblue97 January 27, 2008 10:32 AM PST
Ah, but another point has also been missed. When group has committed a crime and targeted a minority group, but has won more support and more ambivilance than criticism from the average man on the street.

Shouldn't this tell everybody something about the views that people hold about Scientology. If this had been against a black church there would have been outrage from the man on the street.
Reply to this comment
Good Point
by grahamesd January 27, 2008 12:21 PM PST
Today the rights of Scientologists are being trampled on by a group of hackers and few are making an outcry about it. So when they decide to attack another group or religion tomorrow who will stand up? Where does it end?
Scientology
by sfdyoung January 28, 2008 12:27 AM PST
Huh? Your post is almost incomprehensible.

I think that if a black church espoused the silly **** that Scientology does, and had Scientology's track record of ruthlessly attacking its critics, nobody would be very upset if negative comments were made.

We reap what we sow.
hmm
by perfectblue97 January 27, 2008 10:34 AM PST
Apparently, some countries consider it to be a business.
Reply to this comment
Why don't my neighbors show up here?
by SatelliteSteve January 27, 2008 12:28 PM PST
I guess you have to be an A list personality with a very lonely life. Granted I can't remember a song
lyric let alone 20 minutes of mumbo-jumbo script. Maybe L. Ron Hubbard was on to something. I don't think his book explained EVERYTHING in life. So sorry Tom, Bruce and the rest of the flock. NASA can
teach a monkey to fly a plane/rocket. We movie goers
can watch you suceed after how many takes? Not good odds with mind over matter in my books. Satellite*
Reply to this comment
Are Bullies taking over the net?
by grahamesd January 27, 2008 12:43 PM PST
Have any of these hackers ever actually gone to a Church of Scientology and asked to talk to someone about the accusations and rumors that are being used as the excuses for these DOS attacks? Have they ever actually talked to a Scientologist?

Oh no. They blindly believe false accusations that have been thrown out of court time and time again because there is no shred of evidence to back them up.

But actual proof is no obstacle to bigots and hatemongers. "Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth," was said many years ago by the ultimate bigot Dr. Joseph Goebbels and these duped hackers are proving him right.
Reply to this comment
I'm not a hacker.
by SatelliteSteve January 27, 2008 1:04 PM PST
I've never been to a church of Scientology no. And peace to have. But there has to be a line drawn between privacy and sensationalism. I don't blindly
believe anything period. That will include anyone
pro or con anything. So take your phrophetic sayings and shove them down some second century peon's throat before mine. Happy twenty first century grahamesd!
Satellite*
View reply
one word "insane"
by btaylor121 January 27, 2008 1:33 PM PST
i thought the bible was crazy with all the walking on water tales and water to wine bs but i believe scientology has taken the cake on most f*cked up religion ever. have u read these books, articles, all the claims that hubbard has made its insane. i myself have never talked to a scientologist nor would i want to after reading dianetics. o and btw just because someone opposes your religion of choice does not make them a bigot nor a hate monger. your belief like all peoples beliefs are personal and shared among others like you. if u stand behind your beliefs and have this strong faith with this cult stuff then why would you care what people are trying to do or say about your religion.
I said it before, I'll say it again, Godwin's law Mr.Scientologist:
by krosavcheg January 27, 2008 6:42 PM PST
You are so following the pattern of the OSA.
So if they are lying why don't YOU tell us the truth...

They get thrown out of court because of your group throwing lawyers at the problem until people shut up.
Uh bullies already control the Internet
by Andy kaufman January 27, 2008 9:16 PM PST
they are free to harass or attack anyone or any group they want to, and hide behind anonymous IP proxy servers so they are hard to track down.

They can even use the Internet to make phone calls to a target's house at 2am in the morning and harass them by waking them up, and posting their number on IRC or Forums to get more people to harass them.

In case you haven't noticed it, many web sites get hacked per day than just the Church of Scientology web site.

Bullies even took out a power grid in the USA, according to a CNet report recently by hacking into the computers that controlled the power grid.

Ever talk to a Scientologist yourself? Why don't you take their personality quiz on their web site and wait for one of them to contract you via email and tell you to come to the nearest Scientology center to get your results. See if you can resist them trying to sell you one of their books, or tell you how messed up your are mentally due to the results of your personality test. Go in an touch an e-Meter to see what your Thetan level is, and see what they say about fixing that for you.
Here ya go, fella...
by jimmyboom January 27, 2008 10:48 PM PST
Enjoy this lesson, followed by list of references, not heresay:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCGP-0545EU
Right
by Phillep_H January 29, 2008 2:07 PM PST
That's like saying only someone who has used heroin can say anything about heroin, and anyone who has quit is a "disgruntled" former member.

I'll stick with the nFilter discussion groups, and discussions of Sporge.
The Church may become a real force . . .
by fokwp January 27, 2008 12:50 PM PST
. . . if their public affairs people someday learn to manipulate basic English grammar. Their ideas may then appear as if the products of educated minds. This latest proclamation of theirs indicates that such confusion is not likely to arise any time soon, fortunately.
Reply to this comment
Inarticulate
by grahamesd January 27, 2008 12:59 PM PST
I won't get into how many grammatical mistakes and usage errors you made in your four line post. Perhaps the pot shouldn't be calling the kettle black?
Hey fokwp
by SatelliteSteve January 27, 2008 1:24 PM PST
If you believe that, hold your movie stub for the next matinee. You have to be kidding. This is not
Bollywood. Satellite*
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it
by Vryht January 27, 2008 2:47 PM PST
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense. - Buddha
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (129 Comments)

FAQ: Buying the right Windows 7 upgrade

Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.

N.Y. lawsuit details Intel's 'largesse' toward Dell

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.

About Defense in Depth

Covering computer viruses and computer crime, Robert Vamosi goes beyond the hype to provide you with expert interviews of the top security researchers, as well as offering the hands-on, nontechnical advice you'll need to stay safe online.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Defense in Depth topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right