October 14, 2008 4:36 PM PDT

Intel can't figure this out, so who can?

by Charles Cooper
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

If these were normal times, Intel's quarterly earnings report would barely generate more than passing interest. A penny above, a penny below--only Wall Street and day traders give a damn.

But these aren't normal times. Intel today said that its fourth quarter revenue may be anywhere between $10.1 billion and $10.9 billion. That's one helluva wide margin. You see, because of all the recent nastiness in the markets--they just don't know.

Intel explained that the stock market's slo-mo meltdown has created a "high degree of uncertainty" where Intel will finish up the year. That's a big change because this company is usually as precise as a cruise missile in narrowing down its target.

Speaking on the conference call with analysts this afternoon, CEO Paul Otellini allowed that while the just-concluded quarter played out "mostly" as expected, he said the financial crisis had created "some kind of stress that may impact" Intel's business in the current quarter. He's just not sure how.

This much he does know: consumer purchases remain "light at this point in the quarter" and Intel can't predict whether the stock market collapse will keep shoppers away from the malls this December.

You can't fault Intel's brass for not having a better crystal ball. Messrs. Bernanke, Paulson and Bush don't know with any assurance how things are going to end up, either. If you're looking for the silver linking, Otellini did remind his listeners that the current economy bears little resemblance to the post-dot-com downturn.

"One of the things I remember...was that people stopped buying computers," he said. What with all the bankruptcies piling up, there was no shortage of hardware and you could buy second-hand computers and servers at sharp discounts to their sticker prices.

The other statement of note came in the text of the press release announcing the earnings. They deserve quotation in full:

Current uncertainty in global economic conditions pose a risk to the overall economy as consumers and businesses may defer purchases in response to tighter credit and negative financial news, which could negatively affect product demand and other related matters. Consequently, demand could be different from Intel's expectations due to factors including changes in business and economic conditions, including conditions in the credit market, that could affect consumer confidence; customer acceptance of Intel's and competitors' products; changes in customer order patterns including order cancellations; and changes in the level of inventory at customers."

If he was liberty to do so, Otellini would have directed his listeners' attentions to that qualifier. But as the boss, he figures there's no sense in stirring up more panic. Still, this is a holy sh*t moment with Intel basically flipping a coin about where it thinks it's heading. And you know what? The rest of the technology industry is in the same boat.

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. Before joining CNET News, he worked at the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.
Recent posts from Coop's Corner
It's Coop's -30- column: Adios, sorta
To catch a (cyber) thief: It's not easy
I'm officially dropping out of the Twitter gab fest
Telcos said testing plan to offer PCs to businesses
The world is flat. So what's our problem?
First GM, now Silicon Graphics. Lessons learned?
LotusLive Engage: IBM's cloud gets social
LongJump to foster private clouds for corporate IT
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by Aanon October 15, 2008 12:31 AM PDT
The journalist can't write and he has never read a financial statement before.

"...precise as a cruise missile...", "...helluva wide margin.", "...holy **** moment...", "...flipping a coin..."?
What kind of language is this?

"...helluva wide margin.", again: No, it's not, it's about +/-4%.

Why does he cite the entire statement of risk? Has he ever read a financial statement from a company?

He shouldn't be commenting on economics, because he obviously knows nothing about such matters.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 15, 2008 6:42 AM PDT
To be honest, I think the Wall St. roller-coaster ride caught Intel at a bad time... they were making a lot of small but far-reaching internal changes overall, which had on its own introduced a bucket of uncertainties.

Not to say that the changes are bad - many of them made (and in light of things now, definitely make) perfect sense.

Also, I don't think it's so much that things are going to implode in the global markets, so much as things got shook up. The day-traders had (until recently) become a force again on Wall St. - I'm willing to bet that most of them got a good hard kick in the teeth over the past month.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Coop's Corner

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. A graduate of Queens College and Columbia University, Cooper received the Excellence in Journalism award from the Northern California branch of the Society for Professional Journalists for column writing.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Coop's Corner topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right