AT&T ends Dish satellite TV partnership
Satellite TV provider Dish Network said Tuesday that AT&T will end its agreement to bundle its TV service with AT&T's broadband and phone service at the end of the year.
AT&T and Dish have had a joint marketing deal since July 2003, which allows AT&T to package the Dish TV service with AT&T's phone and Internet packages. But AT&T has decided not to renew the agreement, and as required by the contract between the two companies, AT&T is giving Dish six months notice that the deal will expire December 31, 2008.
The move is likely a way for AT&T to negotiate a better deal with either Dish or its competitor DirecTV. In April, AT&T expanded its partnership with Dish in the old BellSouth territory. (AT&T bought BellSouth in 2006.) And it stopped marketing a similar package with DirecTV.
At the time, it looked as if AT&T had dropped DirecTV for Dish. But AT&T has always maintained that it's discussing partnerships with both companies. And now it looks like the company is free to pit one company against the other to get the best possible price.
AT&T said in a statement that it will continue to discuss options with Dish even though it has terminated the current agreement.
Video is a key part of AT&T's strategy. The company has spent millions of dollars over the past few years to upgrade its network with fiber so that it can deliver TV over its IP network. The new U-Verse service is up and running in parts of AT&T's network. But the company isn't able to deploy U-Verse everywhere, so it has been relying on deals with satellite TV providers to deliver a so-called triple-play bundle that includes TV, phone, and broadband services in a single package.
Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie. 




Sina Loghavi
<a href="http://www.dishcheck.com">dish tv</a>
Satellite TV for PC With John Q TV </a>
Here is the confusing part: We must call ATT about WildBlue ISP problems because ATT bought out the Sprint (broadband) rights to our area, according to the FCC letter we got in May 2008. We were told that because ATT could not provide broadband to our specific area, our only choice was to go with a satellite service, through ATT, namely WildBlue. We had had Sprint broadband for five years and the service was outstanding, with great upload and download speeds and we received Earthlink with the package.
Now that we have ATT - via their WildBlue ISP, the service is awful, the upload speeds and the downloads speeds allow one to read a book while waiting for a screen to load. If you use the system too much, they cut back your service!
OK, what I do not understand is how ATT could bump out Sprint and then not provide us with the same level of service on all ATT services. The chain of command is ATT = DISH TV = DISH - WildBlue ISP. In reading this blog, it sounds like ATT has the monopoly and I thought we did away with those a long time ago.
So, if ATT did away with DISH at the end of 2008, how come we are still getting billed by ATT for our DISH TV service and still have to call ATT for our WildBlue ISP service and who is in charge of all this mess?
- by perpekto July 13, 2009 8:44 AM PDT
- 1
- Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)1