June 30, 2008 4:00 AM PDT

How TMZ uses tech to get in your face

by Greg Sandoval
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 8 comments

Harvey Levin, TMZ's managing editor, was among those at the company who recognized that the Web and digital technology could give it an advantage over rivals.

(Credit: Craig Mathews/Warner Bros.)

Alec Baldwin, Lindsay Lohan, and Kramer from Seinfeld may despise TMZ.com, but that hasn't stopped the celebrity news site from bagging more blockbuster scoops the past two years than any competitor.

TMZ's growing reputation as Hollywood's in-the-know and in-your-face news agency was built by working the phones, developing sources and basically out hustling rivals, say executives. What isn't well-known, however, is that the company may also possess a technology edge.

TMZ, which launched as a Web site in 2005 and moved into TV last September, is among the first to build a tapeless, high-definition TV newsroom from the ground up, according to managers.

Other newsrooms have migrated from videotape to digital, but TMZ, perhaps best-known for its reporting on Seinfeld star Michael Richards' racist tirade, was designed for the Digital Age. Not only does this enable TMZ cameramen to shoot using lighter, less expensive cameras, but editors don't have to rip up entire TV shows each time they make changes, says Jim Paratore, TMZ's executive producer.

For these reasons, TMZ often has stories up before rivals and operates more efficiently, executives say. As chilling as this may sound to some, TMZ could be the prototype of a 21st century news agency.

"The business has changed, and the business model of these shows has to change," Paratore said. "You have to figure out how to do these shows more efficiently...We had the opportunity to marry technology with the way we produced the show and create a model that fit the revenue available today."

Technology, in a way, gave birth to TMZ.

The founders recognized distributing news over the Web meant they could post stories, photos, and videos of drunken starlets or brawling actors almost as soon as they obtained them.

TV shows like Entertainment Tonight and Access Hollywood, on the other hand, had to wait until their shows aired. People magazine had to wait until the next issue hit newsstands.

TMZ sees about 10 million monthly unique visitors to its Web site.

(Credit: TMZ.com)

Sure, TMZ's clips weren't as slick looking as those broadcast by some of its rivals. But managers discovered that the audience liked it better that way, Paratore said. For example, the now-famous clip of Paris Hilton and friend Brandon Davis disparaging part of Lindsay Lohan's anatomy while leaving a nightclub, isn't great photography. The footage is grainy and dark.

Yet, the clip of a catty Hilton was viewed more than 2.5 million times and marked TMZ as a player in the Hollywood-gossip industry. Producing video for the Web taught TMZ managers an important lesson: People want unfiltered information about celebrities. Pretty images and clever editing are less important.

"What has changed because of the Web is the whole expectation of what TV is," Paratore said. "People just want to see raw video. They don't want it all beautified and packaged, particularly entertainment news because they think it's all B.S."

After learning that, Paratore and Harvey Levin, TMZ's managing editor, made plans for their tapeless newsroom.

For help, they went to Warner Bros. and its emerging-technology unit. The group focused on designing a low-cost system geared for speed and simplicity.

Engineers opted for off-the-shelf hardware--such as a 32-terabyte storage area network (SAN) from Hewlett-Packard and a bunch of 8-core Mac Pros for editing--rather than spending money on expensive production tools designed for the broadcast industry, said Spencer Stephens, vice president of product technology for the Warner Bros. group.

"It's the same sort of hardware that a financial institution or anybody else using a large 32-terabyte SAN might use," Stephens said. "More traditionally, we would have gone out and chosen something specifically designed for this marketplace, but because this is a relatively small market it would have cost more to get it up and running."

Translation: TMZ had less money to spend and that forced it to be more resourceful.

Sony HVR-Z1U

(Credit: CNET Networks)

Perfect. The company regularly competes against deeper-pocketed network shows, and loves to see itself as a giant killer, Paratore said. If less money meant TMZ had to squeeze more traffic and TV ratings out of fewer resources, so be it. Instead of buying the bulky $30,000 shoulder-held cameras favored by many broadcasters, TMZ settled on the $5,000 Sony Z1U, an HD handheld cam.

The Z1U is a half step from being a consumer product, but managers found that the camera fit with their guerrilla-journalism style.

We've all seen those scenes of reporters, photographers and cameramen swarming around stars outside courtrooms or nightclubs. The Z1U is much easier to handle in these situations than a larger camera.

Another benefit of a smaller camera is it allows TMZ's shooters to be less intimidating when approaching celebrities.

"You can't go around with big cameras, a sound guy, and a multiple-person crew," Paratore said. "You need a smaller footprint. It's all about being a fly on the wall."

Going digital also streamlined editing and content management, which is vital for breaking-news stories.

The system Warner Bros. came up with enables producers to see raw footage, make rough cuts from their desktop, and then assemble timelines for the show as they write their scripts. The system gives producers precious extra minutes to complete work on a story segment.

Traditionally, the segments of a TV news show were combined and assembled onto a tape, Stephens said. The show had to be completely finished by the time it started broadcasting. It wasn't possible to change anything once the show started being aired, he said.

"Now, we're editing individual stories and plugging segments into a video server," Stephens said. "It's very similar if you got an iTunes playlist. You can start the music, but you can also push new pieces into the playlist on the fly. Rather than having to have my story finished a half hour before the whole show airs, now I actually need to finish a couple of minutes before my particular segment of the show airs."

This kind of flexibility is handy when your top news subjects can get busted for a DUI day or night.

Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg, or follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/sandoCNET.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Dead Soulman June 30, 2008 4:30 AM PDT
Levin and his posse are scum. "in-your-face news agency" I would not call this gossip company a "news agency."
Reply to this comment
by Maclover1 June 30, 2008 4:31 AM PDT
TMZ represents everything that is wrong with this country all in one organization. They deal in nothing but Gossip, Rumor, **** talking and massive invasion of privacy.

When I see that main guy on some news channel as a "expert guest" I immediately change the channel.
Reply to this comment
by Maclover1 June 30, 2008 4:31 AM PDT
TMZ represents everything that is wrong with this country all in one organization. They deal in nothing but Gossip, Rumor, **** talking and massive invasion of privacy.

When I see that main guy on some news channel as a "expert guest" I immediately change the channel.
Reply to this comment
by thelemurking June 30, 2008 5:08 AM PDT
I am glad to see that I am not the only one who thinks TMZ and the like are what's wrong with this country... including reality shows ;)

At times I wonder what it would feel like to move to Hollywood and stalk the paparazzi... stand outside their house with cameras, show up at their children's school and crap like that. They deserve a taste of their own medicine.

It's ironic that a lot of people will speak out about online privacy, but watch crap like TMZ or pick up Star, Weekly or what ever those celebrity trash mags are.
Reply to this comment
by kwiswall June 30, 2008 7:22 AM PDT
Who cares?! Why is this such a big deal?
Reply to this comment
by dsstroud June 30, 2008 9:05 AM PDT
I certainly agree with the commenters above that TMZ and their ilk are pretty much the scum of the earth, but the point of the story is that actual news organizations could learn from the process these guys use in their news gathering. I think that is true. Not being tied to legacy workflow and systems, these guys are kicking butt in their area. With all the talk at how poorly newspapers are doing, this is where they need to go. More photogs in the field with smaller cameras getting raw video of what is going on in the community. The problem with newspapers is that they have old school newspaper exec types that have no idea how to create a newsroom with this type of equipment, nor do many of them even understand that this is what they need to emulate from a technology and delivery standpoint.
Reply to this comment
by YankeePoodle June 30, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
I love Gossip. Every day, I live and die to know how Brittany, Paris Hilton, Lindsey Lohan, Alec Baldwin's daughter are doing. Yeah, I breathe Gossip. That is why I am on news.com

My suggestion for news.com, to keep this interesting doing a "real-ality" type TMZ on TMZ. Lets put the fly on the wall in TMZ studio and its great journalists (or Papparazo).

For next edition, lets talk about Yahoo! OMG.
Reply to this comment
by Apolune July 2, 2008 5:45 PM PDT
TMZ may have mastered the "art" of using cheap technology to produce its product, but real journalism requires context. In the Internet-age, live or unedited product distributed solely to inflame is widely available. Intelligent, cogent summary and analysis are sorely lacking.

Since *anyone* can do what TMZ does, its reign will last as long as the attention span of its audience.

Bye-bye, Harvey. You're already old news.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right