June 18, 2008 1:00 AM PDT

IBM's Roadrunner breaks petaflop barrier, tops supercomputer list

by Erica Ogg
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 11 comments
IBM Roadrunner supercomputer

IBM's Roadrunner supercomputer was named the fastest supercomputer in the world Wednesday after breaking the petaflop barrier earlier this month.

(Credit: IBM)

Good news for green tech: The fastest supercomputer in the world is also one of the most energy efficient. That's according to the Top500 supercomputers list, to be released Wednesday at the International Supercomputing Conference in Dresden, Germany.

Twice yearly, the list measures the 500 most powerful computer systems available commercially. This year, the 31st time the list has been put together, the honor of top supercomputer goes to IBM's Roadrunner, which is housed at the U.S. Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory. It's the first system to reach 1.026 petaflops (1 petaflop is equal to a quadrillion, or one thousand trillion, calculations per second).

For perspective, last year's most powerful computer, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's BlueGene/L--also made by IBM--reached 208.6 teraflops. This year that computer ranked No. 2, reaching a max processing speed of 478.2 teraflops.

Fun fact: the fastest supercomputer in the world--used to monitor the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile--is really just a PlayStation 3 on steroids. Roadrunner is based on the IBM QS22 blades, which are built using advanced versions of the Cell processor in Sony's PS3. It also runs using x86 chips from Advanced Micro Devices, making it the world's first hybrid supercomputer.

In total, Roadrunner takes up 278 refrigerator-size server racks, and connects 6,562 dual-core AMD Opteron and 12,240 Cell chips.

IBM, which continues its dominance of supercomputing, makes 210 of the 500 systems, including 5 of the top 10. Hewlett-Packard is close behind, however. HP makes 183 of the fastest computers, including the No. 8 fastest system known as EKA, located in Computational Research Laboratories' data center in Pune, India.

Rounding out the top 10 is Sun Microsystem's Ranger at No. 4, Cray's Jaguar at No. 5, SGI's Encanto at No. 7, and SGI's Altix at No. 10.

On the processor side, Intel dominates the high-end market with 75 percent of all systems on the list and 90 percent of the quad-core based systems that were ranked.

Supercomputing, which pits the highest-end machines against challenges such as forecasting the global climate in coming decades or finding oil reservoirs underground, is a fast-changing field. The Top500 list once again had the most turnover compared with the preceding list, according to the researchers who compile it.

The main measurement used in compiling the list is the Linpack measurement, which puts each system through its paces by having to solve a dense system of linear equations.

The Top500 acknowledges that Linpack isn't a complete test of system performance, but it's a way to test for performance on a similar problem across each system. The need for a more complete benchmarking system has been under discussion for several years.

Some additional interesting statistics about the June 2008 list:

* Quad-core processors are used in just over half of the systems.

* The bulk of the systems (208 of the 500) contain between 2,049 and 4,096 processors. That's more than double the systems that used that amount just six months ago.

* Four of the top five computers (Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5) are located in U.S. Department of Energy labs.

* The U.S. continues to be home to the most computing power in the world. Just over half of the systems (257) are located in the U.S. The U.K. is next with 53, followed by Germany with 46, France with 34, Japan with 22, and China with 12.

After "not specified," the most popular application area for these superfast computers is finance (15.2 percent of the list), followed by research (10 percent), geophysics (9.8 percent), information service (6.2 percent), and service (5.2 percent).

Erica Ogg is a CNET News reporter who covers Apple, HP, Dell, and other PC makers, as well as the consumer electronics industry. She's also one of the hosts of CNET News' Daily Podcast. In her non-work life, she's a history geek, a loyal Dodgers fan, and a mac-and-cheese connoisseur. E-mail Erica.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Seaspray0 June 18, 2008 7:38 AM PDT
To me, this really isn't a single computer. It's more of thousands of computers that talk to each other. What make this unique from networking a couple of thousand computers together?
Reply to this comment
by smokified June 18, 2008 12:08 PM PDT
To understand this fully you should research what a "Blade" server is.
If you network a couple thousand computers together you do not get nowhere near the throughput as you do when you have what is considered a "super computer" Good luck finding ethernet switches that would handle all of that data.
by CharlesWDavis June 18, 2008 7:59 AM PDT
Seaspray0,

Likewise the dual-core could double the number???? But, consider that there apparently is just one input device for the problem and one output device for the answer.
Reply to this comment
by BlueToolsOne June 18, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
Dude that is one SERIOUS computer my goodness sake. Would love to play it in a friendly game of Chess.

JT
http://www.FireMe.To/udi
Reply to this comment
by spothannah June 18, 2008 9:02 AM PDT
If I undeerstand the numbers correctly this computer is about 5 times as fast as the computer that was in first place 6 months ago. Seems that we are reaching "the elbow" of the upward curve of computer speed. Does this kind of speed make formerly intractable problems now solvable? What kinds of problems, formerly impossible in any human length of time, can now be solved in human lengths of times? What other problems remain intractable in this sense? Just curious.
Reply to this comment
by sirgak June 18, 2008 9:31 AM PDT
Seaspray0 wrote:
To me, this really isn't a single computer. It's more of thousands of computers that talk to each other. What make this unique from networking a couple of thousand computers to

Answer:
Well, the afore-mentioned network would have to have all its member computers (for instance, the internet) work on a single problem for a unified effort and a unified answer. And then, it probably still wouldn't be as fast.
Reply to this comment
by WDS2 June 18, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
spoithannah, Roadrunner is about 1000x faster than the faster computer 10-11 years ago. That computer was about 1000x faster than the fasted computer 10-11 years before that. So every 10-11 years the big parallel supercomputers like these are getting 1000x faster. Before BlueGene and now ToadRunner the pace was slacking off a bit. It took some radical new design ideas to catch back up with the previous pace of improvements.
Reply to this comment
by WDS2 June 18, 2008 12:58 PM PDT
Good grief, I need to spell check my postings better. Though ToadRunner does sound kind of cool...
Reply to this comment
by DramosJohnson June 18, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
Amazing speed and functionability. Many suppliers must have made many new inroads with
technology to get this monster to speak.
I received an email alert for a supplier to this "gigantic" system. The cables used here are from a solar company and chip maker EMCORE .
Like to vist the lab at Los Alamos some day.
Reply to this comment
by RicktheBrick June 18, 2008 7:44 PM PDT
With this kind of speed one would think that there would be at least one breakthrough in technology by now and at least one a week from now on. There has to be some economic justification for their existence. I am hoping IBM can use it to get their racetrack memory into production soon. A Terabyte of non-volatile ram memory would be nice.
Reply to this comment
by MathieuPard June 26, 2008 10:10 AM PDT
I love this:

Fun fact: the fastest supercomputer in the world--used to monitor the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile--is really just a PlayStation 3 on steroids. Roadrunner is based on the IBM QS22 blades, which are built using advanced versions of the Cell processor in Sony's PS3. It also runs using x86 chips from Advanced Micro Devices, making it the world's first hybrid supercomputer.

http://green-alternative.info
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right