• On mySimon: K2 Bliss Snowboard Binding
June 11, 2008 6:42 AM PDT

Red Hat settles patent suit with Firestar, DataTern

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

Red Hat announced on Wednesday that it has reached a settlement with Firestar Software and DataTern over a patent infringement lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed two years ago in a U.S. District Court in Texas, centered on Firestar's patent for linking object-oriented software with relational databases.

Firestar, in its lawsuit, had alleged that JBoss, which Red Hat had acquired, violated its patent with the JBoss Hibernate 3.0 object-relational mapping tool for Java. Hibernate 3.0 had an open license.

Under the settlement, whose financial terms were not disclosed, all software distributed under Red Hat's brands and predecessor versions are covered, as well as Red Hat customers that use the software. The software protects derivative works, or combination products, that use covered products from the patent claim.

"Typically, when a company settles a patent lawsuit, it focuses on getting safety for itself," Rob Tiller, Red Hat's assistant general counsel of intellectual property, said in a statement. "But that was not enough for us; we wanted broad provisions that covered our customers."

DataTern became involved in the lawsuit after Firestar assigned the patent to DataTern.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ewriter21 June 11, 2008 7:33 AM PDT
So Red Hat got protection for their commercial offering and for upstream developers as long as their work shows up in a Red Hat product but not other commercial products? Isn't this what Novell and Microsoft did? Didn't Red Hat spend extraordinary effort to paint Novell as the most evil thing ever to happen to Open Source for having done so? Am I missing something or, despite carefully crafted words to create the illusion otherwise, has Red Hat just become a giant hypocrite?
Reply to this comment
by linuxfiend June 11, 2008 10:27 AM PDT
I am continually amazed by the asinine patents companies manage to get through Patent and Trademark Office. Linking object-oriented software to relational databases is neither novel or non-obvious. I don't think the USPTO even reads the applications before they approve them.
Reply to this comment
by Thomas, David June 11, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
I totally agree with a previous poster, this should never have been patentable on the first place. Copyrighted of course! It goes to show the lack of knowledge employed in the USPTO.
Reply to this comment
by airdrik June 11, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
The difference between these patent lawsuits and the Microsoft threats is that these are real, identifiable patents, which apparently those companies do own and such can be proven. Whereas, with the M$ threats there haven't been any patents specifically identified which RedHat or Linux or Open Source violates.
Red Hat is showing that while they aren't going to bow down to threats, they are going to defend their customers and the open source community from real problems.

I look at this and think "Hurray for Red Hat for defending the open source community." Especially since it appears that any fines/dues will be handled entirely by Red Hat so that their customers and the open source community may continue to use the products as though there were no litigation.
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight July 31, 2008 3:54 AM PDT
A legal technicality yet serves a purpose in setting precedent.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Five New Year's resolutions for Google

Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
• Android event set for Jan. 5

For eBay sellers, a holiday hamster hangover

The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right