• On GameSpot: Handheld Xbox coming...eventually.
June 4, 2008 4:54 PM PDT

MySpace, Yahoo blame bad APIs for celebrity photos breach

by Elinor Mills

Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan's private MySpace photos are all over the Internet now, thanks to a glitch in the bad APIs.

While the not-so-publicity-shy stars probably won't mind, and none of the photos are all that racy (except for the one of a fully dressed, provocatively posed Hilton in a tanning booth), there's a lesson for us all in this social network privacy flap du jour.

"Anything you upload to a public Web site is not private; it's public. Even if you think it is password protected," says Jeremiah Grossman, chief technology officer at White Hat Security, a Web application security company. "That's the bottom line."

The photos began making the rounds on Tuesday after computer technician Byron Ngo released them publicly, and gave Valleywag detailed instructions for his hack. Valleywag also has the photos here.

The problem has been fixed so don't bother trying to replicate it. But the breach resurrects the debate over whether the notion of privacy is outdated in a world where you party too much at an event and the next morning an embarrassing photo is up on your friend's Facebook page.

Valleywag blamed data portability, the concept underlying the sharing of data between social networks and other sites.

However, according to MySpace, it had nothing to do with data portability and everything to do with "deprecated APIs."

Grossman attributed it to "insufficient authorization," which he said are common on all types of Web sites, not just social-networking sites.

"MySpace and Yahoo are firmly committed to keeping all users as safe and secure as possible. Recently, MySpace and Yahoo were alerted to a vulnerability within the MySpace widget on the Yahoo mobile platform," MySpace and Yahoo said in a statement. "The functionality of the widget has currently been disabled as we work to roll out an immediate fix."

The man behind the expose' is none other than Byron Ng, a Vancouver-based computer technician who found a hole in Facebook and got to photos on founder Mark Zuckerberg's private page in March.

Ng also is credited with uncovering a digital version of most of the unreleased Harry Potter book last summer.

Ng, if you're out there, I'd love to talk to you.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Dead Soulman June 4, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
If you're stupid enough to post stuff on the internet you don't want the world to see, then you deserve all the ridicule that may come your way. Just because a company says that the content will remain private, doesn't mean that it's guaranteed. But, considering that Lohan and Hilton are two exhibitionists and media-hungry clowns, well, they got they wanted. Attention. People forget to realize that when it comes to the internet, there's no such thing as privacy. Sooner or later that content will become public.
Reply to this comment
by Geeeeez June 5, 2008 3:27 AM PDT
You'd, "love" to talk to a guy who has never discovered anything except OLD information, OTHER PEOPLE have publicly posted... mindboggling.

"who found a hole in Facebook and got to photos on founder Mark Zuckerberg's private page in March."

I don't think so Eilnor.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/how_you_used_to_view_private_photos_on_facebook
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis June 5, 2008 9:30 AM PDT
For goodness sakes..... frankly, why are these people upset that these pictures are getting on the internet? Frankly, my cousin was pleased as punch recently when a picture she uploaded onto her webpage was used by someone else in a photo collage of the 'most beautiful girls in America'.
It seems that there is a HUGE problem here with the stupidity of people who don't want other people to see them nude, yet upload these pictures WITHOUT PASSWORDS onto sites that sometimes, don't offer password protection of albums.
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania June 5, 2008 5:40 PM PDT
Considering the inaccurate information in the article, shouldn't it be completely pulled? At least edit the damn thing to reflect the truth of the origin of the exploit, and what a poor excuse for security they have at MySpace.

This is one reason why bloggers shouldn't be considered journalists.
Reply to this comment
by highlander2000 June 6, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
You don't mess with the Lohan
Reply to this comment
by thedudis June 6, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
Lindsay and Paris are two of the biggest wastes of space on planet Earth.
Reply to this comment
by treet007 June 6, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
Ng just needs to be placed in solitary confinement without any computers or Internet. That should drive him insane... He is no different than the stinkin paparazzi who exploits for profit and eventually kills someone in the process.
Reply to this comment
by MyopicVision June 7, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
You know I can understand wanting to be known through the online media and perhaps score a high paying job based on the infamy but to do it based on old information is pathetic.
I dont know who Brian Ng is but I agree ...he is a total tool. This code was out for MONTHS and no one was any wiser to it. Myspace have a problem on their hands especially as they changed the membership agreement AND have started using applications that handle real money.
These were all minor url exploits.
Not real hacks.
A hack is illegal.
URL exploits are just that. Exploits.
Hell Ive found URL exploits myself for social networking sites and when I emailed the site to tell them..they didn't really care...so as far as I'm concerned,...these sites get what they deserve with the embarrassment.
The fact is NOTHING is private on the internet.Once people realize that..they will be better off.
Reply to this comment
by mentalburner June 8, 2008 7:49 PM PDT
Celebrities and politicians don't realize that one of the reasons they have so much money and fame is because they don't have any privacy. It is one of the sacrifices of the occupation. Doctors work allot of hours and are exposed to diseases as an example. It's a part of the job. Tell them to lump it or leave it.
Reply to this comment
by private-internet July 18, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
There is a trade-off between convenience and security - a proper design system should let you keep your data to yourself and does not let your data be controlled by a third party. Current web services are geared towards public service not private service.
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight July 28, 2008 3:48 AM PDT
The blame game starts.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right