Firefox's market share climbs toward world domination
Firefox is set to top 20 percent global market share in July, continuing its steady trend toward world domination through, er, open-source liberation.
Unlike Microsoft's Internet Explorer, which relied on all sorts of tricks and tying to achieve its dominant status, Firefox's gains seem to be coming for two reasons:
- It works better (Better security, better performance, better functionality).
- It's much more customizable.
As ReadWriteWeb points out, the game is increasingly Firefox's to lose. Internet Explorer used to command 96 percent of the market. Now it's struggling to hold onto 80 percent, with Firefox chipping away, 1 percent at a time.
Better software doesn't always win. In today's market, in fact, the superior marketing budget generally wins.
But not in the IE versus Firefox war, for some reason. Firefox continues to gain market share. Perhaps this time "better" really will translate into market share.
Matt Asay is general manager of the Americas and vice president of business development at Alfresco, and has nearly a decade of operational experience with commercial open source and regularly speaks and publishes on open-source business strategy. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
- Topics:
-
Open source
- Tags:
-
Firefox,
-
Internet Explorer,
-
Microsoft,
-
browser
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us



Not because of any faults with Firefox, but with the websites not supporting the browser.
Even US Gov web sites(US Consulate in Mumbai), did not support firefox and since I was using FireFox, I was not even aware of certain functionality that i was trying desparately to find on the site. As soon as I switched to IE after hours of confusion, things were clear as a sunny day.
I do not want to be hassled by this just because FireFox is a better browser. It might be, but it caused me trouble. I just stopped using it after that.
Now, you might say, I am dumb, but the Majority of the web users are not tech geniuses, we want the browser to be an invisible thing. We want what it delivers and not interested in the great ness of the tool itself.
I think you should really try the ff3. It works great on my computer which runs a vista system.
But on vista, IE7 works also well, but ff3 better.
Here's a tip, write a simple page without font changes or different tables. Just use <DIR> tags and have a CSS script to move everything around. IT's ALOT EASIER!!
Just go to the add-on site and search for IE. If you're running on windows and have IE installed, it will set up a connection so that you can choose to use IE when you're on IE only sites.
Eventually the world will realize they've been duped by M$
Go FOX go!
"Struggling" to hold onto 80%? Ya right....
Yet Firefox really is a business school case study in the abject failure of Open Source projects vs the success of them. At least, that's the more interesting paper to me. Here's why:
- Netscape was very cool and sexy (like Firefox is today)
- MSFT took the ENTIRE market in how long - 3 - 4years?
- Netscape was fighting tooth and nail during that entire time
- Firefox has had 5 years and gotten to a measly 20%
- MSFT isn't even putting up a fight
- Price isn't an issue
- Distribution is somewhat of an issue but hardly enough to explain 80/20
One word, bundling. The only reason IE triumphed is because it came bundled with Windows, the OS used by the vast majority of average users. For this group, there is no great incentive to switch browser. Add MS's antitrust policies to the mix, and it's clear why they won out.
However, the fact that FF has gained such market share so quickly at the expense of IE is a testament to how superior it is. If even average users are going out and downloading it, something is driving them to do so. Simply, quality.