• On mySimon: Doggy Sleeping Bags
May 27, 2008 8:57 AM PDT

Yahoo sues over lottery phishing scam

by Stephen Shankland

Yahoo has filed suit against unnamed "lottery spammers" who tried to fool people into thinking that they won a prize from Yahoo so they'd share passwords, credit card numbers, or other sensitive information.

The Internet company on Tuesday said it filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, citing the Federal Trademark Act, the Can-Spam Act, and related state laws.

"The unauthorized use of Yahoo's trademarks is misleading, fraudulent, and has actually confused, misled, and deceived the public," Joe Siino, Yahoo's senior vice president for global intellectual property and business strategy, said in a statement.

According to Barracuda Networks, 90 percent to 95 percent of e-mail sent in 2007 was spam. Phishing, one activity associated with spam, involves sending e-mail masquerading as authentic messages designed to fool users into parting with personal information.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered Google, Yahoo, servers, supercomputing, Linux and open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen, or follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/stshank.
advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Mikejoem May 27, 2008 10:46 AM PDT
90 to 95 percent? Why?

I refuse to read or even respond to spam, much less make a purchase based on something I received from a spammer.

Why would anyone in their right mind use spam as a means to advertise.

Just wasted money if you ask me.
Reply to this comment
by Mikejoem May 27, 2008 10:46 AM PDT
90 to 95 percent? Why?

I refuse to read or even respond to spam, much less make a purchase based on something I received from a spammer.

Why would anyone in their right mind use spam as a means to advertise.

Just wasted money if you ask me.
Reply to this comment
by gsmiller88 May 27, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
Spam, schmam! If you read it in an email it must be true. Just this week I have inherited $30,000,000 for my humanitarian efforts and began boycotting Pepsi products because they omitted "In God We Trust" from the pledge of allegiance printed on some Dr. Pepper cans in 2002!!!
Reply to this comment
by zroth May 27, 2008 12:36 PM PDT
If everyone thought like you, then spam wouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately, not everybody thinks like that. There are morons out there who do respond to the offers that they receive in spam. As you said, it seems insane to buy anything (medicine, especially!) through a completely unknown, unsolicited source. But, supposedly all it takes is for less than 0.01% of spam recipients to buy something to make it profitable for the spammers. 0.01% doesn't seem like much, but applied to trillions of spam (sent at almost no cost to the spammers), then you can see why it makes up as much as 95% of all e-mail.
Reply to this comment
by Nissj May 28, 2008 10:06 AM PDT
Yahoo sues spammers? What a joke! No one is a bigger spammer than Yahoo.

When I received my first computer a year ago, I established my first email with Yahoo. Over the years I had heard the name many times and I thought I was doing a good thing. Until the next day, and the next, and the next.

I started receiving emails for offers of persons and products that would do "amazing things". I had not given my email address to anyone I knew and yet I was suddenly Miss Popular with with a bunch of deviants whose site I had never nor would ever visit. I deleted all the emails and decided to use another email service.

Several months later I checked back at Yahoo. I was amazed to see 125 of those same type of emails. However, by this time I had learned how to tag an email as junk/spam and block the sender.

How did all these people know my email address so quickly? Certainly I had a security center with a spam blocker. It appeared it also was caught off guard.

I have not used Yahoo email since and I cringe whenever someone tells me their email address is xxxxxx@Yahoo.com!
Reply to this comment
by tekwiz4u May 28, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
Why dont people use common sense here. If you WON a FREE PRIZE, why do they NEED a CREDIT CARD!!!???? And why would Yahoo NEED a password!???

Geez people....WAKE UP!!!
Reply to this comment
by benjaminstraight July 24, 2008 4:00 AM PDT
Good for Yahoo, go after them.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

After 5 years, Firefox faces new challenges

Mozilla helped reshape the Web since releasing Firefox 1.0 five years ago. Now it's got a reawakened Microsoft and Google Chrome to reckon with.

There's a map for that: GPS or smartphone?

Almost every handset comes with mapping software these days, but standalone GPS devices are becoming more affordable than ever.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right