A new wrinkle: Microsoft could take 'minority, passive stake' in Yahoo
With the Microhoo drama back in overdrive Monday, investors may be scrambling to figure out what buying a "minority, passive stake" means.
Reuters is quoting a source saying Microsoft is considering buying Yahoo's search business and taking a "minority, passive stake" in Yahoo once Yahoo has spun off its Asian assets. That's not a direct quote from the source, that's how the Reuters reporter described it.
This is a new wrinkle in the barrage of coverage for two reasons: It's likely the first time anyone has reported Microsoft would be interested in taking what sounds like a backseat at Yahoo (in addition to buying the search business). And it adds to earlier rumors that the Chinese search site Alibaba wanted Yahoo to sell its stake in Alibaba to keep it from Microsoft. Some speculate Softbank could be interested in buying that stake.
Like many other Microhoo rumor reports, take this one for what it's worth: Reuters reports the proposal is "little more than an outline of Microsoft's thinking," and does not yet include a value for Yahoo's search business. Of course, Yahoo is still believed to be in partnership talks with Google on the search business, as well.
Does Yahoo suddenly find itself, despite threats from corporate raider Carl Icahn, with two search suitors it can play off one another?
Jim Kerstetter has been writing about the high-tech industry for more than 13 years, as a senior editor at PC Week, a Silicon Valley correspondent at BusinessWeek, and now an executive editor at CNET News. He moved back to Boston because he missed the Red Sox. E-mail Jim. 
In no way can MS benefit from Yahoo, Ballmer put himself in a corner and his job is riding on this, which is the only potential rainbow for Microsoft.
MS can assimilate Yahoo in one form or another and choke it or they can just fire Ballmer and perhaps have a chance of a future.
- by benjaminstraight July 20, 2008 2:06 PM PDT
- No way. Microsoft doesn't sit second chair.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)