Firm fined $45,000 over alleged H-1B favoritism
A Pittsburgh computer consulting company accused of showing a preference for H-1B temporary visa holders in its job vacancy ads has agreed to pay a $45,000 fine as part of a settlement with the federal government.
During a monthlong period in spring 2006, the firm iGate Mastech published 30 job postings, that, by the U.S. Department of Justice's description, "expressly favored H-1B visa holders to the exclusion of U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and other legal U.S. workers." That behavior violates the Immigration and Nationality Act's provisions, which bar employment discrimination based on whether the applicant is a U.S. citizen, the Justice Department said.
"We are committed to protecting the right of all authorized workers in the United States against citizenship status discrimination," said Grace Chung Becker, acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's civil rights division, which conducted the investigation and said it would continue to monitor iGate's practices.
In addition to the fine, the settlement requires iGate to train its recruiters and to post a "nondiscrimination statement" on its Web site.
A list of frequently asked questions at the Justice Department's Web site says that in job postings, employers "may not express a preference for H-1B candidates or other individuals requiring sponsorship or employment visas."
An iGate representative did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. The company, founded in 1986, describes itself on its Web site as a provider of "technical and functional consulting services to Fortune 500 corporations, on the technologies that drive their businesses," with clients including Carnival Cruise Lines, Exxon Mobil, Ford, GE, IBM, and Verizon. It has locations in Europe and Asia and employs about 1,000 people.
The Justice Department's action comes just a few weeks after U.S. immigration officials reported receiving more than 163,000 petitions vying for a congressionally mandated cap of 65,000 visas. Another 20,000 slots are reserved for foreigners holding advanced degrees from U.S. universities. H-1Bs allow foreigners with at least a bachelor's degree in their area of specialty to work in the United States for up to six years.
Some members of Congress have proposed doubling or tripling the cap in response to intense lobbying from large high-tech companies like Microsoft, Oracle, and Google. They say they need more visas to fill critical gaps in their operations, particularly since so many foreigners obtain math, science, and engineering degrees from American schools, or they'll be forced to move more work offshore. Meanwhile, other politicians have voiced concerns about abuses of the system and have proposed measures that would require employers hoping to hire H-1B workers to do more to seek qualified Americans first.





$45K would be the petty cash fund.
The current administration is so anti-labor/pro-management I
can't believe they did something about a company looking to fill
30 positions with foreign workers. Makes one wonder how
many times the company did this in past...
The Bushies claim to want to get immigration under control. At
the same time, they don't want to deprive their big corporate
allies of cheap labor... The whole thing is a farce...
around. The Bush Administration does not care to protect our
tech workers, manufacturing workers, any workers. The
Democratic Congress is no less complicit. The Tech industry in
the Valley, in Washingon (as in Redmond), etc are all heavy
Democratic supporters and they support more H-1B visas as
well, they will not protect manufacturing (except moving their
lips for their district) or any other jobs and allow illegal
immigrants to come in and drive down the price of labor at the
low end at the same time H-1B visas are used to drive down
wages at the upper end.
There needs to be harsher penalties. Revoke the companies? ability to apply for H-1B visas for a set length of time for each offence. Require companies to give specific reasons to applicants why they aren't qualified for the job; that way you give companies less ground to say, "no one qualified applied for the job" and give applicants chances to improve to apply for similar jobs in the future. As things stand right now, companies will not speak to you about why you are not qualified for a job.
And direct evidence of a slap on wrist by the Bush Administration.
This company cost U.S. citizens 100 of thousands of dollars in opportunity, and all they had to pay was a lousy 45k.
The Bush administration could care less about the U.S. economy and the U.S. citizen worker.
What the Bush administration has demonstrated so far, we'll bring you high oil prices and take your job away all at the same time.
But this case shows rather nicely that the laws work. Companies that violate the laws get punished.
But of course, anti-H1s like Mr. Leone are too dense to get that...
Here's the URL with the info:
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/press_opt_ifr.pdf
SRD
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
Most of these workers are paid less than 25% of the billing dollars.
NRIsoft, calling itself an un-sweatshop, is paying h1b workers 92% of billing. I used to work for a large consulting company that paid me $18 while it was raking in $79/hr.
you can go to the website http://www.nrisoft.com
Is it the sweat shops to be blamed or ignorant h-1b workers, for lack of information?
Ultimately, when the H1 workers are paid US wages, sweat shops will soon go out of business, if no H1 worker is available to work at Indian wages.
- by benjaminstraight July 14, 2008 4:36 AM PDT
- benjamin straight writes: 45k? How did that number come up?
- Reply to this comment
-
(20 Comments)