• On The Insider: Judge Bans Real Housewives Sex Tape
April 30, 2008 9:46 AM PDT

Proposed new piracy penalties advance in House

by Anne Broache

A congressional proposal designed to stiffen penalties and enforcement against pirates and counterfeiters moved a step closer to becoming law on Wednesday.

As expected, the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a copyright holder-backed enforcement proposal known as the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property, or Pro-IP, Act, which is chiefly sponsored by the committee's chairman, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.).

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the committee's ranking member, said the U.S. Department of Justice is filing more intellectual-property cases than ever--217 in 2007--but suggested that's still not enough. The bill's passage shows "there is a bipartisan commitment to ensure the next president and succeeding administrations have the resources, organizations, and strategies that are required to protect our vital national and economic interests," he said in a statement.

The revised 68-page measure does not contain a controversial provision that would have dramatically increased fines in copyright infringement lawsuits.

The bill would, however, rewrite U.S. law to allow federal officials to seize property from convicted copyright infringers who made unauthorized copies of music, movies, or live performances. That property could include computers or other equipment used to commit intellectual-property crimes or obtained as a result of those proceeds. In civil cases, the feds would have to establish that there was a "substantial connection" between the property and the offense.

At a previous hearing, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said she worried that approach doesn't address the possibility that property could be seized from innocent people if a convicted pirate used it to commit crimes without their knowledge. (At least one defendant in a peer-to-peer lawsuit brought by the RIAA was sued because someone else was using their Wi-Fi access point.)

The bill would also create a new presidentially appointed position whose pick would be charged with acting as a chief adviser on intellectual property enforcement matters. The U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Representative, as the position would be known, appears to be modeled after the U.S. Trade Representative, which already has some intellectual property enforcement responsibilities and puts out an annual report on global piracy.

The proposal also calls for the appointment of 10 new intellectual-property "attaches" to serve in U.S. embassies and creation of a new "intellectual property enforcement division" within the Justice Department. The Justice Department, for its part, has been resistant to those bureaucratic changes, arguing that its current setup is already effective enough.

The Copyright Alliance, a coalition of major copyright holders, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a pro-business group, were quick to praise the bill's passage.

"The Judiciary Committee has taken a necessary step to ensure America's innovation industries continue to create jobs, develop creative products, discover the drugs that cure critical diseases, and find cutting edge technology solutions to global challenges such as climate change," Caroline Joiner, executive director of the U.S. Chamber's Global Intellectual Property Center, said in a statement. "We urge the full House and Senate to pass the legislation so it can be signed into law."

advertisement
Click here!
Recent posts from News Blog
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Was InfoWorld's CTO of the Year award a year late?
VMWare VI4 renamed to vSphere
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Wonderful...
by umbrae April 30, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
Now modern day cartels will have a whole department in the government to support their needs. Needless to mention that more "convicted pirates" are 13 year old children and single moms. However, how can that compare to protecting the profits of a multi-billion dollar industry with dying business models?

We have no government anymore. It is no longer We the People; It is We the Corporations.
Reply to this comment
I could not Agree with you more
by Migraine May 1, 2008 1:22 AM PDT
Soon my Ipod will get me 10 to 20 years in Jail .

meanwhile BIG OIL keeps price gouging the USA and our goverment does nothing about it!

Way to go BUSH! I only hope the USA can last till your out of office!

I fear we will not make it though!
Read the Bill - It's not what you think
by steer99 May 1, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
The reporter gets it wrong, the bill does not affect civil cases, and so has no effect on "13 year old children and single moms" who may be getting sued for CIVIL copyright infringement. The copyright changes in the bill only affect copyright criminals, who have engaged in pretty egregious conduct (wilfull infringement; commercial benefit or private financial gain; pre-release copies; convicted beyond a reasonable doubt; etc.).
Asset Seizure?
by R. U. Sirius April 30, 2008 10:44 AM PDT
You know, the problem I have with this is that it is using taxpayer dollars to protect big business. You know damn well that this will do nothing to protect my copyrights or the copyrights of any other small independent producer.

And let's face it, this idea of asset seizure is disturbing. The RIAA is going to have an legal orgasm over this.
Reply to this comment
More asset seizures for the fascist state
by random1138 May 2, 2008 2:27 AM PDT
I think they're going to have *actual* orgasms over this, but I digress.

Do we really need yet another way for the government to seize assets? (probably without convictions, without return, and without recourse)
Where's the HARM?
by hpew April 30, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
I think there should be a distinction between copy for commercial - for profit
distribution and copy primarily for personal use.

I once watched an interview with a wise (Circuit Court) Judge who handled
primarily IP/copyright cases. His take was that if accusers could not show
harm to their product, he would generally dismiss the case.

This take was that Patent and subsequent IP laws were meant to protect the
originator from harm to their property. No harm - no foul.
Reply to this comment
I agree totally
by Leria April 30, 2008 4:43 PM PDT
If there is no real monetary harm (i.e. the person pirating stuff would never be able to afford the real thing) then the copyright cases should be dismissed.

They should ONLY be going after commercial pirates, period.
Crooked Politics As Usual
by mikele11111 April 30, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
Lamar Smith is nothing but a political hack who is the tool of The RIAA, MPPA and every other lobbying group the buys off congressman with campaign contributions that are really nothing but bribes. Check Smith's list of contributors and I guarantee you will find these guys have made major payoffs (oops, I mean contributions)to him.
Reply to this comment
"protect our vital national and economic interests"
by Melekai April 30, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
Please, these buzzwords are getting tiresome.
Reply to this comment
How about corporate regulation instead?
by feliusrex April 30, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
If the House/Senate has so many extra resources that it can direct the DOJ to create whole new departments to go after imaginary property crime, how about we start doing so corporate regulation? I know of a lot of energy companies, communications companies, oil companies, ect ect that need much much more oversite. I would rather see the electric distribution sector regulated again than waste time/money/effort on increasing profits for the RIAA.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Look before leaping to short URLs

Fueled by Twitter's rise, services that scrunch Web addresses are taking off. They bring a host of problems, but some are working to fix them.

In Utah desert, it's bombs away

road trip At the massive Utah Test & Training Range, the Air Force runs 15,000 sorties a year to ensure that pilots and weapons are on the mark.
• Photos: Training and testing

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right