• On BNET: Bill Gates on the iPad
April 8, 2008 1:05 PM PDT

Homeland Security secretary proposes 'Manhattan Project'

by Elinor Mills

Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff

(Credit: Charles Cooper/CNET News.com)

Risks from cyberattacks are increasing and the consequences are so great that the country needs a "Manhattan Project" for network security, Michael Chertoff, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said in a keynote on Tuesday at RSA 2008.

"We need a game-changer with how we deal with attacks," he said. "In January, the president signed a homeland security directive, for a national cybersecurity initiative...almost like a Manhattan Project."

"Cyberthreats have enabled terrorists and criminals to do the kind of damage they would never be able to contemplate doing in the real world."
--Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff

"Cyberthreats have enabled terrorists and criminals to do the kind of damage they would never be able to contemplate doing in the real world," he said.

For example, a botnet denial-of-service attack shut down the Estonian government last year for about two weeks, according to Chertoff. "It went beyond simple mischief, and represented an actual threat to government to govern its country."

"A single individual, a small group of people, or a nation-state can exact the kind of damage or disruption that in years past only came when you dropped bombs or set off explosives," he added.

The government needs the "best and brightest" from Silicon Valley and elsewhere in the private sector to work on creating an advanced warning system to prevent such cyberattacks.

"We face a very serious challenge and it's only likely to grow more serious as time passes," Chertoff said. "We're operating in a domain in which traditional military power or the power of the government is insufficient to address the full nature of the threat. A command and control response will simply not be adequate. We need a network response to deal with a network attack."

During a question-and-answer session afterward, Chertoff defended the government's Real ID law, which would create a uniform national ID card. Chertoff said the card would make the country's buildings and airplanes more safe from terrorists. Opponents say the inconvenience and privacy concerns outweigh any perceived benefits.

Chertoff asked rhetorically, when choosing between an airline that allows people without identification to board and one that doesn't, "which airline would you put your children on?"

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
Recent posts from News Blog
If you care about Web, ignore this IPO
Nasdaq 5,000: Ten years after the dot-com peak
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
How would this help?
by scdecade April 8, 2008 2:22 PM PDT
The primary threat to the peace and security of the American people is the federal government. They were responsible for 9/11, they lied about the pretense for war, they torture people, and they unilaterally revoked the 4th amendment to the Constitution. I'd burn my own eyelids off with a torch before I helped the government keep secrets from the people.
Reply to this comment
The DHS has no credibility left
by n3td3v April 8, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
"Cyberthreats have enabled terrorists and criminals to do the kind of damage they would never be able to contemplate doing in the real world."

You should have thought about that before you invaded Iraq you ******* wank.

All the best,

n3td3v
Reply to this comment
The Right Idea Wrong Government
by russkeller April 8, 2008 2:36 PM PDT
Finally someone IN government points out the obvious. Now if only we can keep the vultures from milking it and get people on board who are going to do the job. I find that part doubtful.
Reply to this comment
The best defense is a ...
by Lee in San Diego April 8, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
The best defense is a good offense. If you can defend against a
cyber attack you know to conduct one.
Reply to this comment
Chertoff is a Zen koan
by jake989 April 9, 2008 12:00 AM PDT
To say that we need a 'Manhattan project' for computer security is to unask your own question because it's so clueless. To think that you can fight an asymmetric, distributed threat with a top down government-funded project indicates how out of touch this guy is with anything approaching reality.

As for the 'which plane would you board', this response is a direct appeal to people's fears. The 9/11 bombers _had valid identification_.

Can we have a law saying we can sue the DHS for malpractice?
Reply to this comment
Wow
by scdecade April 9, 2008 6:14 AM PDT
Amen. Very well said.
Militarization of Cyberspace
by DemiHampster April 13, 2008 2:53 PM PDT
No one has ever been killed in cyberspace. If the government is
that worried, maybe they should just stay the f*ck out. Problem
solved.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
Click Here
CNET River

What the iPhone jailbreak ruling means

faq The practical impact of a new Digital Millennium Copyright Act ruling may be limited because Apple's end user contract still restricts jailbreaking.

Redesign for Terrafugia's flying car

A successful test flight of a prototype Terrafugia vehicle has led to structural improvements just unveiled. The company hopes to start shipping late next year.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right