• On BNET: Bill Gates on the iPad
advertisement
April 7, 2008 7:33 AM PDT

Duplicate content: Separating the penalty from the filter

by Brian R. Brown

Several weeks ago at SMX West I had the pleasure of meeting and having lunch with Brian White from Google. White works on Matt Cutts' Web spam team, tirelessly working to make Google's search results the best they can be, ensuring the best user experience. Quite a hefty task indeed.

You'd think that someone who spends his days fighting the never-ending battle that is Web spam might be a bit negative or jaded. If that is the case, he does an amazing job hiding it. Instead, he was upbeat and you could feel the excitement in his voice as he spoke. Here's a guy who loves what he's doing and truly wants to not only improve the searchers' experience on Google, but wants to make the Web a better place. You can't help but like a guy who's fighting the good fight.

During the "Lunch with a Googler," those at the table had an opportunity to ask questions and to share their stories. In spite of the noise in the expo hall where lunch was being served, the conversation was great. There were a number of interesting questions that were presented, but one stood out that I was initially surprised with. The question was essentially about dealing with "duplicate content penalties."

I was actually reminded of this the other day when I signed up to sample an SEO tips e-mail and one of the tips was addressing this same "penalty." When those who speak on SEO call this a penalty, it's no wonder that Webmasters and even in-house SEO practitioners continue to struggle with this.

During our lunch when this question came up, White tried to address it and I even hopped in to lend a hand. Perhaps this is confusing because it is an important issue to be aware of, but there are some basic misunderstandings that continue to trip people up. So let's break this issue down into bite-size chunks.

Duplicate content penalty vs. filter
First, before we break duplicate content out into its various flavors, let's take care of the penalty issue. This is probably the biggest area of confusion. Unfortunately, when the issue around duplicate content was first discussed, it was referred to as a penalty and there are still many blog posts, forum threads, and pages that refer to this as a penalty.

Duplicate content doesn't really fall under the classification of a penalty--unless perhaps you are trying to spam the search engines with an exorbitant amount of duplicate pages. Even then, a penalty will probably only come into play based on the intent--are the duplicate content pages the result of site or CMS issues, or a deliberate attempt to influence search results? The handling of duplicate content falls under what is called filtering.

Rather than penalizing sites or Web pages, the search engines filter out those pages that they consider to be duplications, placing them further back within the search results. If the pages you want to show up first don't or other sites rank higher for the same content, then the engines may be seeing it as duplicate content and filtering appropriately.

If you still think your site is actually being penalized because of this, you can try searching in the search engines for the page title, a section of content, or the URL of the page. If the title is too simple, short, or common, then try wrapping it in quotation marks for an exact search or use an intitle: search, e.g., intitle:"Duplicate Content" (note: no space after the colon). If your page has been indexed, but doesn't seem to appear for these searches, then you may be looking at more than just a filter. However, at this point, it would be good to review other issues that might have garnered a penalty, such as other negative practices, like hidden links.

So hopefully that helps lay the penalty vs. filter issue to rest. Next, I'll break this out into the different types of duplicate content and ways to deal with it.

Originally posted at Searchlight
Brian Brown is a Consultant & Natural Search Marketing Strategist for Netconcepts. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from News Blog
India prods wireless providers on BlackBerry ban
If you care about Web, ignore this IPO
Nasdaq 5,000: Ten years after the dot-com peak
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by BrickMarketing April 8, 2008 11:27 AM PDT
Great article... it's definitely hard to know sometimes with the crazy ever-changing Google algorithms.
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:14 PM PDT
jklnrfesklnklnkl
by PlagiarismChecker May 23, 2010 2:14 AM PDT
Duplicate content checker - http://plagiarisma.net
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:13 PM PDT
avs
by dengyasong August 19, 2010 9:10 AM PDT
<p><strong>How can we <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com>discount glasses</a> so much?<br />
<a href=http://www.glassespeople.com>GlassesPeople.com</a> was developed by eye doctors to create an inexpensive method for people to acquire high quality <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyewear>eyewear</a>, finished <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyeglasses>prescription eyeglasses</a> online. From their experience in both private offices and retail establishments, the founders of this <a href=http://blog.glassespeople.com>cheap glasses</a> store decided they could provide this service for people inexpensively, bypassing expensive retail establishments. </strong></p>
<p><strong>We use the same high quality <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/glasses>glasses</a> materials, but can offer them at a high discount <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/sunglasses>prescription sunglasses</a> because of our high volume, since we don't have the additional overhead constraints (such as retail rent space, behind-the-counter employees, and expensive displays) that your doctor's office or optical must overcome. Since operating this website is much less expensive than a typical <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyeglassframes>eyeglass frames</a> retail establishment, we are able to pass these savings on to the general public online. At the same time, if you have any <a href="http://forums.glassespeople.com">prescripton glasses</a> problems, you can get help here, you will find <a href="http://www.glassespeople.com/forums/">buy glasses</a> here is very happy</strong></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/glassespeople">http://twitter.com/glassespeople</a><a href=http://www.cheapglasses123.com>glasses</a>
by besteyeglasses June 14, 2010 6:51 PM PDT
<p><strong>How can we <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com>discount glasses</a> so much?<br />
<a href=http://www.glassespeople.com>GlassesPeople.com</a> was developed by eye doctors to create an inexpensive method for people to acquire high quality <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyewear>eyewear</a>, finished <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyeglasses>prescription eyeglasses</a> online. From their experience in both private offices and retail establishments, the founders of this <a href=http://blog.glassespeople.com>cheap glasses</a> store decided they could provide this service for people inexpensively, bypassing expensive retail establishments. </strong></p>
<p><strong>We use the same high quality <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/glasses>glasses</a> materials, but can offer them at a high discount <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/sunglasses>prescription sunglasses</a> because of our high volume, since we don't have the additional overhead constraints (such as retail rent space, behind-the-counter employees, and expensive displays) that your doctor's office or optical must overcome. Since operating this website is much less expensive than a typical <a href=http://www.glassespeople.com/eyeglassframes>eyeglass frames</a> retail establishment, we are able to pass these savings on to the general public online. At the same time, if you have any <a href="http://forums.glassespeople.com">prescripton glasses</a> problems, you can get help here, you will find <a href="http://www.glassespeople.com/forums/">buy glasses</a> here is very happy</strong></p>
<a href="http://twitter.com/glassespeople">http://twitter.com/glassespeople</a><a href=http://www.cheapglasses123.com>glasses</a>
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:13 PM PDT
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/">uggs</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-argyle-knit-c-16">ugg classic argly knit</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-ultra-short-c-11">ugg ultra short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-lo-pro-button-c-21">ugg lo pro button</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-short-c-4">ugg classic short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-nightfall-c-8">ugg nightfall</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-mini-c-5">ugg classic mini
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:13 PM PDT
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/">uggs</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-argyle-knit-c-16">ugg classic argly knit</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-ultra-short-c-11">ugg ultra short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-lo-pro-button-c-21">ugg lo pro button</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-short-c-4">ugg classic short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-nightfall-c-8">ugg nightfall</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-mini-c-5">ugg classic mini
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:15 PM PDT
sasadf
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 17, 2010 10:18 PM PDT
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/">uggs</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-argyle-knit-c-16">ugg classic argly knit</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-ultra-short-c-11">ugg ultra short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-lo-pro-button-c-21">ugg lo pro button</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-short-c-4">ugg classic short</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-nightfall-c-8">ugg nightfall</a>
<a href="http://www.discountu99boots.com/ugg-classic-mini-c-5">ugg classic mini
Reply to this comment
by dengyasong August 19, 2010 9:10 AM PDT
sasadf
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement
CNET River
  • stshank: Mozilla coders touched 20,000 lines of code to overhaul Firefox JavaScript engine http://bit.ly/bKUR2d Jägermonkey part of Firefox 4.

  • stshank: "all of their understanding comes from a twenty-minute talk they listened to while running on a treadmill" http://bit.ly/ci4r07

  • stshank: Like clockwork, Chrome print preview slips another (tho shorter) release cycle. Now Chrome 8 (v6 is the current one): http://bit.ly/dsUv0N

  • stshank: Just enabled Google Instant w/ Opera using @brucel faux-Firefox tip. http://bit.ly/9l5bsT Haven't heard back from Goog re. why they disable

  • stshank: I'm not a one-shoulder camera bag person, but if you are, Think Tank Photo's new Sling-O-Matics go on either shoulder http://bit.ly/at8h4n

  • stshank: Pentax K-r: same sensor as K-x SLR but w/ new autofocus, HDR night mode, SDXC support, faster burst. By @loricnet http://bit.ly/crO9v5

  • stshank: Google moves Chromium source code hosting into Webkit's repo with Chrome 7: http://bit.ly/az4NQ1

  • b1g1nj4p4n: RT @TokyoScum @remoteryan a ton of stuff on Broadway in the pipeline || Used to work in Nakano, live in Nishi-Shinjuku. Totally miss B'way

  • b1g1nj4p4n: RT @TokyoScum: The condensed history of Nakano Broadway: http://tokyoscum.blogspot.com/2010/09/my-posses-on-broadway-history.html

  • loricnet: Pentax intros skinnable RS1000 ultracompact cam http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20015846-1.html

  • loricnet: Pentax launches K-r to take on the Canon T2i http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20015770-1.html

  • danackerman: If only I could somehow travel into the future and get this right now -- Sonic Screwdriver controller for the Wii: http://reg.cx/1KyY

  • jdolcourt: SEO is the core of Google's search--surfacing results in real-time means relevance is more important to gain to top slot, not less.

  • jetscott: Built-in HDR in iOS 4.1 is fast and automatic, but it feels more subtle than the HDR Pro app I downloaded. Apps offer more control options.

  • jdolcourt: I sure do love me some mobile payments. http://bit.ly/ceXlDU

advertisement

Google Instant: Better but not revolutionary

The search leader has genuinely advanced Internet search if not rewritten the rules. But what of searches from the browser?

Apple 2010 iPod lineup, reviewed

CNET reviews Apple's 2010 lineup of iPod portable media players, including the fourth-generation iPod Touch, sixth-generation iPod Nano, and the fourth-generation iPod Shuffle.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right