Google goes dark for Earth Hour
Dan Farber is editor in chief of CBS Interactive News, which includes CBSNews.com and CNET News. He has more than 25 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. E-mail Dan.
Dan Farber is editor in chief of CBS Interactive News, which includes CBSNews.com and CNET News. He has more than 25 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. E-mail Dan.
Readers still have lots of questions on just which version of the software they need to buy in order to upgrade their PC. CNET News tries to offer some answers.
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's federal antitrust case filed Wednesday alleges a longstanding symbiotic relationship between Intel and Dell.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
First iPhone, now Droid. Who needs Windows?Windows Mobile is losing the last glimmers of its mojo as phones based on the Android 2.0 operating system push the buzz meter needle into the red zone.
Gallery
Photos: Top-rated reviews of the week
Wireless
Apple said to be working on 'world-mode' iPhoneThe AppleInsider blog says it's gotten wind of a "hybrid iPhone," due in the third quarter of 2010, that would work on both GSM and CDMA (hear that, Verizon?).
Beyond Binary
Sesame Street, Droid get Google's loveThe search king has given much of its front page love this week to honor Sesame Street's 40th anniversary, but it did save some space to tout the new Droid smartphone.
Video
Exploratorium's shocking 40th anniversary kicks off
Digital Media
New pre-orders of Nook face shipping delayDemand for the unreleased e-book reader is so strong that the bookseller is telling new customers not to expect shipment until December 11.
Video
A new workout for the Wii
Politics and Law
Going rogue? Palin bans gadgets, reporters from speechThe former Alaska governor joins a tradition of controversial politicians stoking up more press criticism by attempting to avoid it in the first place.
Health Tech
How much would you pay to see your future?Three years after the human genome was sequenced at a price tag of $3 billion, Complete Genomics does it for just $4,400 in material cost.
Gallery
Photos: Emerging devices at AT&T Labs
Crave
Beamer, the iPhone case for night owlsThe latest offering by the Quirky design collaborative is an iPhone case with a built in LED light for use as both a flashlight or a camera flash.
Green Tech
Al Gore: It's not just about the planetIn a talk promoting his book, Al Gore looks for fixes beyond renewable energy and draws the link between environment, energy, and the economy.
Unless there are thieves casing your home out, just waiting for the lights to go off, turning your lights out for an hour will make absolutely no difference.
Perhaps a little more thought and a little less emotion should go into the formation of opinion.
Cheers, Papy
Me and my family go green in ALL the ways we can!!!
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-black-is
a tad more impressive if they had turned off the ad revenue for
an hour.
What remained brightly lit is Google's hypocrisy.
A site which has been offering this kinda search for a while is www.searchincolor.com. There's actually a green background, lol...
-SG
Gores, oh my!
Sounds a lot like Commies and Fascists and Hitlers, too, if this
were only a couple decades ago...
We should definitely leave our lights on so that these awful
people don't use those fear tactics on us while we're at home in
the dark. I can just imagine an environmentalist lurking outside
my window.
Seriously, though, what harm can you do by saving a little
energy here and there? Don't want thieves breaking in to your
house, maybe you can leave one light on and still feel ok. Or
maybe you could make a more long-term investment by
switching to florescent bulbs or something.
Really, the point here isn't to scare you or to subvert you into
one of those dirty, scary hippies, it's so save some resources at a
time when many people are unsure about the longevity of said
resources.
I don't understand the resistance to something like this. Who
are you hurting by lowering your electricity bill and possibly
(depending on what you're so inclined to believe about the
environment) helping the world out? Even if you don't subscribe
to the notion of climate change, surely you can understand the
idea that energy costs money, so energy efficiency and diversity
are beneficial.
The problem why people don't agree with all these mega-corporations, and self-appointed environmentalists, is that they're great at preaching but not at following their own advise.
If Google wants to convince me that they have a great interest in reducing pollution or energy, then send me a link to the "BILLIONS" they've donated to companies working on alternative sources of energy.
Right now it says "536,062.571 Watt hours saved".
sometimes it even uses more energy. You should actually read the
research...
They might have had more participation if they'd advertised it a little more. The first I heard about it was a few minutes ago (the hour ended 1.5 hours ago as I write this) when I read this article.
interested in paying $500 and then complaining when someone
brings up the notion that I should use less, even if they don't.
I commend you for using more efficient florescent bulbs, and as
you point out, we know nothing about who you are or where you
live, but come on, your comment was strictly name-calling and
anger-based. I understand your concern about corporations like
Google being, at times, hypocritical, but that neither excuses
anyone from a responsibility to be concerned about their effects
on those around them, nor does it justify your contempt for
certain politicians and social groups. If anything, I would say
your point about Google serves to illustrate the refusal of certain
other politicians and interest groups to jump on the bandwagon
of environmentalism when it suits their own interests... just like
major corporations tend to do. you're on to something that I
agree with, I just don't think you've made the connection to
yourself or your politics. I'm curious if you have a measured
response to this, or if this is going to be a debate from two
decidedly high horses.
Glo goolge!
-im trlying to baand-eid mly knee, blut I htink i jjust bannd-aidd hte cat.
And how does it cost you extra money to waste less energy? If you are going out and buying something like a Prius, sure, you're spending extra. But if you choose to drive something other than a much more expensive gas guzzling SUV, I can't see a problem. People did, and can still do, just fine without them.
Those who will do nothing are the fools, and they ruin it for all those who know better!
- stupid
- by kakodes_too March 31, 2008 7:28 AM PDT
- Stupid
- Reply to this comment
-
-
- Okay...
- by ddesy March 31, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
- So you've proven you're mature. Now what?
-
-
(60 Comments)