Google goes dark for Earth Hour
Dan Farber is editor in chief of CBS Interactive News, which includes CBSNews.com and CNET News. He has more than 25 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. E-mail Dan.
Dan Farber is editor in chief of CBS Interactive News, which includes CBSNews.com and CNET News. He has more than 25 years of experience as an editor and journalist covering technology. E-mail Dan.
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.
Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Business Tech
EU hearing on Oracle-Sun set for Dec. 10Oracle is set to meet with European Commission regulators to make its case for its acquisition of Sun Microsystems.
Gallery
Crave
Revealing Apple's 2009 Black Friday dealsAccording to purportedly leaked documents on the tech rumor site Boy Genius Report, Apple is gearing up to offer a series of a variety of bargains on products from iPods to MacBooks.
Beyond Binary
Windows 8 in 2012?It's not clear what Microsoft's desktop plans are, but the Windows Server team included slides at PDC suggesting a new major release coming around 2012.
Video
Google Chrome OS demonstration
Technically Incorrect
AT&T gets Luke Wilson to hit Verizon againPhone company continues to fight accusations that its 3G network is poor. One new spot uses the same strategy as the iPhone, featuring simultaneous voice and data.
Video
Google Chrome OS unveiling
Politics and Law
Confidential 9/11 pager messages disclosedGlimpse into events of September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks comes from pager messages that have been anonymously published on WikiLeaks.org.
Cutting Edge
CERN particle accelerator sees first collisionsFour days after its restart, the scientific work at the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland has headed "into new territory. It's been going quite remarkably fast."
Gallery
Passive-aggressive gifts for tardy geeks (photos)
Crave
Thanksgiving poll: What are you most grateful for?Matt Hickey, for one, is thankful for that baguette from the future that stopped the Large Hadron Collider from destroying the universe. What are you feeling most thankful for?
Green Tech
Science untarnished by 'Climategate,' U.N. saysChair of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says stolen e-mails do not damage the credibility of findings that humans are to blame for global warming.
Unless there are thieves casing your home out, just waiting for the lights to go off, turning your lights out for an hour will make absolutely no difference.
Perhaps a little more thought and a little less emotion should go into the formation of opinion.
Cheers, Papy
Me and my family go green in ALL the ways we can!!!
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-black-is
a tad more impressive if they had turned off the ad revenue for
an hour.
What remained brightly lit is Google's hypocrisy.
A site which has been offering this kinda search for a while is www.searchincolor.com. There's actually a green background, lol...
-SG
Gores, oh my!
Sounds a lot like Commies and Fascists and Hitlers, too, if this
were only a couple decades ago...
We should definitely leave our lights on so that these awful
people don't use those fear tactics on us while we're at home in
the dark. I can just imagine an environmentalist lurking outside
my window.
Seriously, though, what harm can you do by saving a little
energy here and there? Don't want thieves breaking in to your
house, maybe you can leave one light on and still feel ok. Or
maybe you could make a more long-term investment by
switching to florescent bulbs or something.
Really, the point here isn't to scare you or to subvert you into
one of those dirty, scary hippies, it's so save some resources at a
time when many people are unsure about the longevity of said
resources.
I don't understand the resistance to something like this. Who
are you hurting by lowering your electricity bill and possibly
(depending on what you're so inclined to believe about the
environment) helping the world out? Even if you don't subscribe
to the notion of climate change, surely you can understand the
idea that energy costs money, so energy efficiency and diversity
are beneficial.
The problem why people don't agree with all these mega-corporations, and self-appointed environmentalists, is that they're great at preaching but not at following their own advise.
If Google wants to convince me that they have a great interest in reducing pollution or energy, then send me a link to the "BILLIONS" they've donated to companies working on alternative sources of energy.
Right now it says "536,062.571 Watt hours saved".
sometimes it even uses more energy. You should actually read the
research...
They might have had more participation if they'd advertised it a little more. The first I heard about it was a few minutes ago (the hour ended 1.5 hours ago as I write this) when I read this article.
interested in paying $500 and then complaining when someone
brings up the notion that I should use less, even if they don't.
I commend you for using more efficient florescent bulbs, and as
you point out, we know nothing about who you are or where you
live, but come on, your comment was strictly name-calling and
anger-based. I understand your concern about corporations like
Google being, at times, hypocritical, but that neither excuses
anyone from a responsibility to be concerned about their effects
on those around them, nor does it justify your contempt for
certain politicians and social groups. If anything, I would say
your point about Google serves to illustrate the refusal of certain
other politicians and interest groups to jump on the bandwagon
of environmentalism when it suits their own interests... just like
major corporations tend to do. you're on to something that I
agree with, I just don't think you've made the connection to
yourself or your politics. I'm curious if you have a measured
response to this, or if this is going to be a debate from two
decidedly high horses.
Glo goolge!
-im trlying to baand-eid mly knee, blut I htink i jjust bannd-aidd hte cat.
And how does it cost you extra money to waste less energy? If you are going out and buying something like a Prius, sure, you're spending extra. But if you choose to drive something other than a much more expensive gas guzzling SUV, I can't see a problem. People did, and can still do, just fine without them.
Those who will do nothing are the fools, and they ruin it for all those who know better!
- stupid
- by kakodes_too March 31, 2008 7:28 AM PDT
- Stupid
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Okay...
- by ddesy March 31, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
- So you've proven you're mature. Now what?
- Like this
-
(60 Comments)