Microsoft recasts legal team for Yahoo bid

There are a lot of moving parts in Microsoft's unsolicited buyout bid for Yahoo. One of the latest arose last week when the software giant switched its legal team back to its old standby, Sullivan & Cromwell, from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which dropped out as legal adviser due to a conflict with another client.

It's tempting to start connecting the dots, but one source familiar with the change said the conflict in question had nothing to do with Simpson's client AOL LCC, which the law firm advised on the Goowy Media acquisition. That deal closed on January 30, two days before Simpson's client, Microsoft, announced its unsolicited bid for Yahoo.

Full coverage
Microsoft's big bid for Yahoo

Click here for the latest on the software giant's attempt to buy the Net pioneer.

Yahoo reportedly is in talks with AOL, News Corp., and others about them coming in as a white knight to outbid Microsoft.

"We hold Microsoft and its team in the highest regard," Pete Ruegger, Simpson's chairman, said in a statement. "However, in order for us to fulfill our ethical obligations to each of our clients, it became necessary for us to withdraw from this representation."

A spokesman for Simpson Thacher declined to comment beyond Ruegger's statement and declined to disclose the name of the client in conflict.

However, the conflict centered on the "timing of a clearance" and the client declining to issue a waiver to Simpson Thacher to continue representing Microsoft, the source said. And because Microsoft's bid was unsolicited, the issue of a potential conflict could not be addressed beforehand, the source noted.

Other Simpson clients include DoubleClick, which the firm successfully represented before the Federal Trade Commission involving the proposed Google merger. And while the FTC cleared the way for the merger, DoubleClick will still be represented by Simpson before the European Commission during the proceedings this year.

Microsoft, from the get-go, however, did not involve Simpson Thacher for any antitrust representation in its Yahoo bid, according to a report in Lawyer.com.

[Sea of Cortez]

Anoox search engine might be better than either

I say it again, the reason that Google is doing badly is this killer search engine called AnooX
that is putting an end, at least a serious dent, in Google dominating all information & search.
Again if you look at Anoox you will see that really is the better search engine for many,
because of these FACTS:
1- Anoox search results are democratically powered by the knowledge of the people,
that is YOU and me vs machines mysteriously powering results of Google & yahoo,
you can read more about this here:
http://www.anoox.com/voting_overview.jsp

2- Anoox Advertising costs are MUCH lower than Google or Yahoo because Anoox
is operated on a "Not-Profit-Motivated" basis, you can read more about this here:
http://www.anoox.com/community-based-model.jsp

And there are many other cool things that Anoox gives, such as the best free Web chat
I have seen, a free Blog & a really cool free news site.

And I tell you this from our own small business example: our company has saved
more than $10,000 over the last 6 months by switching our Advertising from Google
to Anoox. This has been a real life saver for our small business.
My hat off to AnooX :)
It is the best friend of small businesses and those who seek truth in information.