February 6, 2008 4:31 PM PST

David vs Goliath: The 2.0 version

by Charles Cooper
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

I couldn't escape the irony of spending Wednesday morning on Microsoft's Silicon Valley campus, listening to show-and-tell presentations from 15 Israeli tech start-ups.

While Microsoft is trying to buy its way into becoming a more serious challenger to Google, here was a collection of very talented bootstrap operations trying to turn their respective "aha" moments into real businesses.

What with global stock markets going from bad to worse nearly every day, this was a tonic reminder that some incredibly creative development work continues apace regardless of the manic gyrations on Wall Street.

(Credit: IsraelWebTour)

The sessions were organized by the California Israel Chamber of Commerce. Here's a link to its Web site, where you can find the full list of presenters. Even better, BlogTV (one of the companies that took the stage) recorded the proceedings, which you can replay.

For lack of a better reference term, you can classify the companies on display here under the Web 2.0 banner. (Someday, we've got to come up with a better description.) By now, you know the drill: a nimble start-up figures out a clever and unconventional way to view the world and rolls up its sleeves to get to work. I can't tell you how much of this stuff ultimately will wind up on the cutting room floor. Some of the companies already have funding. My hunch is that most of the rest won't have a hard time getting venture capitalists to provide backing.

What struck me, though is how--yet again--small start-ups are doing the more interesting development work.

This has been a recurring theme since the bubble burst. On paper, at least, there's no reason why a Microsoft, which hosted the event, couldn't have come up with a product like PageOnce, which developed a personal Internet assistant, or 8hands, which offers single point access to your social-network accounts (with real-time notifications).

But that's why Microsoft stands ready to spend billions on a Yahoo or an Aquantive or some much smaller fry. And it's not just Microsoft. Yahoo and Google have had little compunction about writing big checks. Is that the best way to secure a prosperous future? Ask Time Warner. I'm sure CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, still struggling to put a coda on his company's disastrous AOL acquisition, wishes he could turn back the clock.

Then again, when the M&A gurus plot their big plans on the white boards, who actually thinks they're going to get that badly burned?

Charles Cooper has covered technology and business for more than 25 years. Before joining CNET News, he worked at the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
It shouldn't be a suprise
by The_Decider February 6, 2008 7:04 PM PST
Yes, we need a better term then the totally meaningless and irrelevant web 2.0. It is more inane then the word blog. How about tech startup?

Why should it surprise anyone? Large companies of any industry are generally very conservative. They abhor risk.

Software, is something a person or a group of people can create in their spare time and actually surpass what the slow and cautious corporations are doing.

Not many industries have such a low barrier to entry. Software definitely does.

So to get noticed(and get some VC money or a buyout offer)they have to actually push the boundaries.

As long as anyone with the talent and a computer can write code, this industry will be driven by the bottom-up.
Reply to this comment
Agreed
by charlie cooper February 7, 2008 7:23 AM PST
You're 100% right. But I have to wonder whether this will be the preferred MO "going forward" as the MBA's are wont to say. I'm talking software, specifically. On the hardware side, the big guys are still doing a good job advancing the ball. Down at the Almaden labs, for example, IBM is coming up with more high tech toys than it knows what to do with. What's fascinating is how the Internet has reduced the start-up cost for an entrpreneur: all you need is brains and an Internet capital - at least to start.
View all 2 replies
PageOnce
by ahikamkaufman February 6, 2008 7:40 PM PST
Charles, thank you for the supporting post and we would love to get more comments and feedback from readers on how to make PageOnce the best Personal Internet Assistant.

While we're currently on a limited beta, for the remainder of this week, we're allowing IsraelWebTour readers to join our beta and start enjoying PageOnce at

www.pageonce.com/cicc.htm

Best regards,

Ahikam Kaufman, CoFounder and COO
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right