Homeland Security proposes delayed Real ID rollout
Update 1:03 p.m. PST: This story was updated to add reactions from Congress and additional information about the privacy and security aspects of the Real ID rules.
WASHINGTON--If the Bush administration gets its way, all Americans will be required to present Real ID-compliant identification documents--or risk facing "inconveniences" at airports and federal buildings--by 2017.
DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff
(Credit: U.S. Department of Homeland Security)In a matter-of-fact outline of the final rules governing the controversial program, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on Friday vowed to counteract the naysayers and defend what he called a "more secure form of identification that will serve both our homeland security and our individual concerns about personal privacy."
Only three categories of people need be "disappointed" by the forthcoming identification cards, the Homeland Security chief told attendees at a midday press conference here: terrorists, illegal immigrants, and con-men.
The nearly 300 pages worth of guidelines for states put forth Friday came after the agency reviewed some 21,000 comments responding to draft regulations from last March.
The Real ID Act, which Congress passed as part of an emergency spending bill in 2005, is the result of recommendations from the 9/11 Commission. Chertoff reiterated Friday that the program is necessary in part because all but one of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks carried government-issued identification cards that helped them remain in the country illegally. Another goal is to prevent illegal immigrants from "pretending to be American citizens so they can work illegally in this country."
To that end, under the new rules, motor vehicle offices will be required to take photographs of driver's license applicants at the beginning of the application process and keep those images on file for five years. The idea is to help catch applicants who forge their identities--and fail to fool employees into issuing them cards--if they try to pull off a repeat attempt.
Whether the final rule will hold up through the decadelong implementation process remains to be seen. Prominent Democrats in Congress were quick to attack the approach.
"While fulfilling this 9/11 Recommendation is vital to our national security, I believe that the Final Rule still requires a great deal of work by the Department of Homeland Security," Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), chairman of the House of Representatives Homeland Security Committee, said in a letter Friday.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that he would continue to push for passage of a bill that would repeal the Real ID Act. That mandate would be replaced with what supporters say is a more "flexible" approach, in which states, privacy groups, the federal government, and other interested parties would devise a mutually beneficial approach to improving driver's license security.
New timeline
Arguably the biggest change in the final rule is the timeline. States will generally have a larger chunk of time, broken into "milestones," to become compliant with the new standards. Earlier in the planning process, Homeland Security had envisioned requiring the IDs to be in place starting on May 11, 2008--and no later than 2013--unless states had applied for an extension.
The final rule dictates that by the end of 2009, states will have to complete certain checks on all residents who apply for driver's licenses, such as verifying against Homeland Security databases that the cardholders have legal immigration status and ensuring that the Social Security number provided matches with Social Security Administration records. States will also have to conduct background checks on motor vehicles employees "to ensure licenses are not issued by corrupt insiders."
By May 11, 2011, states are expected to have methods in place to verify that the identity documents provided by driver's license applicants, such as birth certificates, are valid. They'll also be expected to start issuing Real ID-compliant licenses by then, if not sooner.
By Dec. 1, 2014, all Americans under the age of 50 will be expected to present Real ID-compliant licenses when boarding airplanes and entering federal buildings. Exactly three years later, all Americans, regardless of age, will have to meet those requirements.
Opponents of the Real ID plan said the deadline extensions do nothing to change their view that the requirements are unworkable.
"What the Department of Homeland Security has done is to kick the can down the road to the next administration, and probably not just to the next administration, but conceivably two to three administrations from now," Barry Steinhardt, an ACLU attorney, said on a conference call with reporters.
One key part of the timeline, however, remains unchanged, which may create a new dilemma for states that have opposed or outright rejected implementation of Real ID.
If states haven't asked the federal government for an extension for implementing the identification card program by 60 days after the final rule is formally published, which has not yet happened, then their residents will no longer be able to use driver's licenses or state-issued ID cards to board airplanes or enter federal buildings. Instead, they'll have to present one of the alternative acceptable forms of identification, such as a State Department-issued passport.
"There's no question the law creates a very powerful incentive for states getting on board with this process," Chertoff said Friday. "Convenience and common sense strongly counsel in favor of getting on the path toward secure identification."
According to Chertoff, 40 percent of the U.S. population live in states that have already begun the process of moving forward with Real ID. But 17 states have passed legislation registering their opposition to the regulations, of which six of those--Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Washington--expressly prohibit compliance with Real ID.
In the ACLU's view, the threat of "inconvenience" to state residents who don't sign onto the plan is largely empty since alternative forms of ID will be accepted.
"This is an avoidable train wreck," Steinhardt said.
The states that have voiced resistance to Real ID have done so largely because of the hefty price tag, which Homeland Security initially estimated at $23 billion total, of which $14.6 billion would fall on state governments to pay.
Lingering funding, privacy concerns
Chertoff on Friday touted that under the final rule, the agency was able to cut that estimated cost to $3.9 billion. He also said that, based on dividing that cost by the number of Americans estimated to be applying for such a card, each Real ID-compliant license would cost only $8 (although whether states would actually charge that amount was another story, he added).
That substantial reduction drew skepticism from the ACLU, which claimed the adjusted figure is based on the assumption that one in every four adults "isn't ever going to get a Real ID license."
Another challenge is that Congress still hasn't appropriated anywhere near that amount of money to the states, William Pound, executive director of the National Conference on State Legislatures, said in a statement.
David Quam, a lobbyist for the National Governors Association, said state officials were still reviewing the mountain of regulations but would have some tough decisions to make in the coming weeks. He said it's too early to say whether they'll request additional time to make a decision about whether to comply.
"States and legislators and decision makers are going to have to turn around and make a decision as to what does Real ID mean, what does it bring us, and is it worth it," he said in a telephone interview.
Under the minimum standards set by the Real ID Act, all compliant licenses must contain all of the information typically on a driver's license--that is, a person's name, address, signature, date of birth, gender, photograph, and license number. In addition, they must contain physical security features designed to make them counterfeit-proof and use a "common, machine-readable technology."
That machine-readable requirement--and a lack of requirement that the encoded information be encrypted--has ignited concerns among privacy advocates who worried information could be swiped off the cards and used willy-nilly by bars, clubs, and other outsiders who may swipe the cards' bar code.
Those groups said their worries were hardly assuaged by Friday's final rule. Homeland Security kept the lack of encryption requirement because, in its words, of "law enforcement's need for easy access to the information and the complexities and costs of implementing an encryption infrastructure."
The final rule also leaves states responsible for setting minimum privacy standards for how such information may be used by third parties. That means "if any state in the country has weak or no privacy standards, every other state is going to be subjecting its citizens' information to a weak standard able to be stolen by identity thieves and harvested by people who want to share that information and sell it to other people," said Tim Sparapani, the ACLU's senior legislative counsel.
Melissa Ngo, an Electronic Privacy Information Center representative, said her organization still has major concerns about the Real ID requirements but cited one positive point: The latest rules do not compel states to embed radio-frequency identification chips in the cards. Such a requirement could have created the possibility that outsiders could skim off information more easily without the cardholder's permission.
yours,
george w bush
Today, you have the freedom to allow all of your taxes to be spent on illegal immigrants. We have the freedom to have our identities stolen from us. Just what freedom are you giving up by having a verifiable means of identification? You must not want people to know you are who you say you are!
The only problem with this system is that it won't be available any sooner that it is.
The line, "You only need to worry if you're a criminal," has been around for hundreds of years. If we didn't need to worry, we wouldn't have had a Bill of Rights to begin with.
I'm afraid we've all been bamboozled by this freedom thing. It was a great idea, but we're no longer the leaders in this field either!
Oh, btw, GW isn't the first, nor will he be the last President to allow and encourage erosion of our rights and freedoms. And it's not only Republicans doing it!
We currently have a major problem with identification of US citizens. Citizens of other countries that are not US citizens are successfully registering to vote in our elections. This means that people from other countries are choosing our president, representatives, and senators. This has to be prevented. How do we stop non-US-citizens from registering to vote? I can't travel to France and vote for the French president. I can't travel to Mexico and vote for the Mexican president. Why do we let other people travel to the US and vote for our national leaders?
If you're against RealID, then tell me how would you cure this problem?
If you think it will stop this problem, think again.
People are against it because it is unconstitutional and un-American.
Are WE the imminent threat to our homeland security?
So.. I guess that our goverment has to place it's people under complete surveillance in order to provide 'safety'?
Last time I checked, terrorism threats were coming from abroad... right?
Well then again, Billy Bob from Arkansas is a big man... with a shot gun and some connections.
Ohh yeah, he's danger alright.
Once again. Putting the American people under terror. Man, these poloticians have it down, don't they?
What next the North American Union? England's citizens struck down a supreme EU power grab in 2005 only to have it return in a measure their leaders refuse to put to a vote. There goes their sovereignty, and so will our sovereignty be lost and our Constitution with it.
making me sick.
GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEAD PEOPLE - THE TERRORISTS YOU
SHOULD BE FEARING RESIDE IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!
If this illegal and immoral regime really cared about 9-11, then
why is Saddam Hussien dead while OBL is running around free as
a freakin bird in Pakistan??? Hello??? How can anyone be this
stupid and still remember to breathe???????
Or something like leather imbued with metalic dust or something.
Remote scanners used by theives is a bad thing.
This will be an article in wired magazine.
The documents are REAL folks, the process is flawed. It doesn't take Law School or to be a Politician to understand that. The sooner you people "get it" and see what is coming, the sooner "we" can stop this. Revolt from Americans? Entirely possible the way we are heading...
Guess what the NC DMV advises? Have your name changed at Social Security. Hope you don't need your license renewed anytime this decade!
2. Once everyone finds it socially acceptable its time to move on to get everyone with a chip embedded into their skin.
3. The robotic age begins!!! Arnie watch out!!!
If we accept Real ID thats it!!! The human race is on the footing for being electronically controlled. We must reject we must reject!!! Terminate!!! Eventually we'll have a whole bunch of electroinc chip boards under our skin. This is the first move by our governments in the grand master plan to turn humans into super robots where the mind can be controlled to manipulate a world police agenda spear headed by the united states. If you don't want chipped its time to move to the east who don't support this advancement in man kind. The world has a lot to fear from this its not just Americans who need to worry its everyone in the world.
These things that the government is pushing for would make us NO more safe in the long run, and much less safe (from government interference in places they shouldn't be interfering in) in the short and long run.
Nobody will need to carry ID cards or Passports.
Inspired by my ex-wife's alienation of our child, the "Laureen Detector" is what I call my proposed technology. Teh solution came to me when I was trying to analyze her "targeting parent" behaviours. My solution is:
LD = iris scanning + BRACE Analysis + rapidly predictive software.
I have suggested a new way to use biometric iris scanning when joined to predictive technology like Russell Smith's BRACE Analysis? Then, make it rapidly predictive with correlation software.
This idea is to apply "rapidly predictive personality tendencies profiling" software based on BRACE Analysis and a paper out of Sweden entitled: "Associations between iris characteristics and personality in adulthood."
"Variable and person-oriented analyses were used to explore the associations between personality and three previously untested general iris
characteristics: crypts, pigment dots and contraction furrows. Personality data, as measured by the NEO PI-R and ratings of iris characteristics from 428 undergraduate students were collected. Crypts were significantly
associated with five approach-related behaviors, i.e., feelings, tendermindedness, warmth, trust and positive emotions, whereas furrows were
associated with impulsiveness.
These findings suggest that because Pax6 enzyme induces tissue deficiencies in both the iris and the left anterior cingulate cortex, Pax6 may influence the extent people engage in approach-related behaviors. The results from using a person-oriented analysis suggested that people with different iris configurations tend to develop along different personality trajectories.
Future longitudinal studies, twin-studies and genetic association studies, may benefit from collecting iris data and testing candidate genes for crypts and furrows. Mats Larssona,, Nancy L. Pedersenb and Håkan Stattina. Department of Behavioral, Social and Legal Sciences, Center for Developmental Research, Örebro University, 701 82 Örebro, Sweden Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. February 2007."
RPPTP will be a non-racial, non-religious, non-political "tendency profiling" tool. Simply being able to predict who was likely to do harm
would be a useful tool for agents in the field.
I would also like to see it used in preventing child abuse such as psychological alienation. Perhaps the DHS and NAO need useful applications that also augment utility with all 50 states. One idea combines the BRACE Analysis tool with rapid iris screening to predict terrorist tendencies. An article called "Associations between iris characteristics and personality in adulthood" is available on the web. ( iris characteristics + screening
BRACEAnalysis => more effective agent tools and effective family courts in all 50 states ? ) www.braceanalysis.com
In my life, I view parental alienators as domestic terrorists. The BRACE Character Profile revealed to me the fact that my ex-wife has some mild traits of positive correlation to paranoid, antisocial, and psychopathic tendencies. Prior to this, I thought that she was just antisocial and angry at me for divorcing her in 1992. So, I started thinking about the future of "early detection" of potential abusers. It would also be most useful, as a smart screening tool in the Family Courts of all 50 States. I also need help
in deprogramming my alienated daughter. I hope that the FBI/DHS can assign a behavioral specialist from Quantico to this problem.
Bud Labitan
(Loving Non-Custodial Father.)
And since some of the idiots posting think that if you have nothing to hide, then you should accept it.
What this does is lead to self-censorship. In other words, the right to retain your sense of self.
HUGE potential source of identity theft. They could
become a far larger security threat than the problems -
both criminal and terrorist - that these cards are
intended to solve.
You fools deserve nothing less. Next time when you idiots laugh at the French for having so many strikes, rallies, etc...and bring their cities and government to a standstill, maybe you'll stop laughing and start paying attention more. Then again maybe you won't because you've all got ear-muffs and blind folds on...
Yeah...go ahead...keep enjoying your SUV's and 24 hour supermarkets....because that's all your lives are going to boil down to...you pathetic cretins.
- Maybe you should look at your own foreign policies
- by armmat January 13, 2008 1:17 AM PST
- Look at the way you idiots treat people around the world. Look at the way your corporations use other people's lands and lifes as dumping grounds so patriotic fanatics like yourself can justify driving around in living rooms on 4 wheels.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Every man is his own man.
- by tusks January 13, 2008 3:32 PM PST
- Every man is his own man, and only his actions are to blame. I am sorry for the way my government treats others. I am sorry for the way the corporations of America indulge themselves in their riches with the sweat of the less fortunate people in their own county and in others.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (72 Comments)Are you so arrogant to think your actions and policies don't affect the way people think and react to you? Do you honestly think you live in a bubble?