• On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
November 19, 2007 7:36 AM PST

What are the odds you'll land on a typo-squatting site?

by Dawn Kawamoto
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 4 comments

Typos and URLs make a terrible combination, according to a report released Monday by security company McAfee.

Web surfers have a 1-in-14 chance of landing on a typo-squatting site, due to mistyping the URL of a popular site, according to the report called "What's In A Name: The State of Typo-Squatting 2007."

Landing on such a site, in turn, can ultimately lead receiving more spam, once one's e-mail is harvested from the typo-squatting site. In a majority of the cases, however, typo squatters are looking to generate money via pay-per-click ads on their domains, according to the report.

McAfee, which examined 1.9 million variations of 2,771 popular domain names, found that game sites had the greatest likelihood of being squatted at 14 percent, followed by airline sites at 11.4 percent, and mainstream media sites at 10.8 percent. Dating sites, at 10.2 percent, and technology-Web 2.0 sites, at 9.6 percent, were fourth and fifth. Children's site are also highly targeted by typo squatters.

It may be time to rein in those dancing digits.

Dawn Kawamoto covers enterprise security and financial news relating to technology for CNET News. E-mail Dawn.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
grammar checking tool
by nitpicky November 19, 2007 9:05 AM PST
anyone else find writing with grammar/spelling mistakes credible?
Reply to this comment
Raise The Domain Registration Fee
by Stating November 19, 2007 9:37 AM PST
This is what happens when you can register a domain for only $3. If the fee were or $100 or more then it would reduce the number of cyber squatters.
Reply to this comment
I would take that one step further
by `WarpKat November 19, 2007 9:53 AM PST
Regulate the registrars so that they are REQUIRED to check (BY HUMAN BEING) the domain being registered and then determine if it's meant to be a squat site. This would justify raising the fee to at LEAST $75 per domain per year and decrease the fee after the first two years to $10 a year.

Unfortunately, WIPO makes it difficult to do just that since they have an 'arbitration process' that one has to go through to get something like this taken care of - BUT it costs an arm, leg and a soul just to get it started - not very consumer friendly.
sad trend
by editor23--2008 November 22, 2007 10:40 AM PST
It was sad that typosquatting is seen even for kiddy sites like http://www.americangirl.com and http://www.indianchild.com/.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

As alternative energy grows, NIMBY greens

With more renewable energy projects trying to come online, the country grapples with the balance between local land use and a national push for clean energy.

Google to remake programming with Go

A Unix co-creator is among those behind a language Google hopes will speed computers and programming. Today, Go becomes open-source software.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right