October 30, 2007 2:24 PM PDT

U.S.-Microsoft antitrust deal to get temporary extension

by Anne Broache
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

Microsoft, state prosecutors, and the U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday said a federal judge needs more time to weigh whether Redmond should be subjected to a lengthier period of antitrust policing.

In a joint filing with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who has been overseeing Microsoft's antitrust compliance, they asked for a soon-to-expire oversight period to be temporarily extended until at latest January 31, 2008. That way, the judge will have more time to weigh the merits of last-minute pleas from a number of state prosecutors to add another five years to the oversight regime.

Right now, most of Microsoft's 2002 consent decree with the Bush administration is set to expire November 12. One small portion, related to a communications protocol licensing program that has encountered numerous delays since its inception, has already been extended through November 2009.

Kollar-Kotelly is expected to sign off on the new schedule without incident, as the timeline was discussed during a conference call with the parties last week.

It's important to note that the temporary extension is purely procedural and would be imposed "without prejudice," meaning the judge isn't reaching any conclusions yet on whether Microsoft needs to be overseen by state and federal prosecutors for a lengthier period of time.

Under a new schedule proposed by the joint court filing, Microsoft would have until next Tuesday to file a response to the state prosecutors' proposal, and the Justice Department and the state prosecutors would also have time to respond within the next few weeks.

The Justice Department has already said it doesn't believe there's any need to extend the oversight period and that the agreement with Redmond has been working as designed. But state prosecutors from 10 states, including New York and California, and the District of Columbia, said they're concerned Microsoft's market share is still problematic for potential competitors and warrants additional oversight. Other states involved in the proceedings have opted to remain neutral.

Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
Government Agency requiring Explorer
by technewsjunkie October 30, 2007 5:00 PM PDT
Where's that article about a Government Agency REQUIRING MS
Windows Internet Explorer for submissions!?

Is it over? Just look at their own requirements!
Reply to this comment
A failed policy
by Microsoft_Facts October 31, 2007 5:55 AM PDT
A breakup of Microsoft, with Bill and Steve serving jail time, still falls short of the penance due to society for the crimes they committed.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right