• On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
October 11, 2007 10:46 AM PDT

Google billionaires get another jet

by Elinor Mills
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 10 comments

The fun thing about having lots of money is you can buy as many toys as you want. Over at Google it's a veritable playground.

(Credit: Boeing)

A company controlled by Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page and CEO Eric Schmidt, with the strange name of H211 LLC, has an agreement to land four jets at Moffett Field, according to documents released to The New York Times after the paper filed a Freedom of Information Act request. Moffett Field, which is operated by NASA Ames Research Center, is very close to Google's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters.

So, in addition to the two Gulfstream Vs and a Boeing 767, the Google billionaires anticipate landing a Boeing 757 at the airfield starting sometime next month, the documents show.

Google and NASA have a public-private partnership that gives NASA scientists access to the planes and provides fees that help defray the costs of running Moffett, a Google spokesman told the Times. Oh, and the Googlers have bought carbon offsets to mitigate the Boeing 767's negative impact on the environment, he says.

The Google billionaires are paying $1.3 million annually for the Moffett rights.

Some may see the planes as a sign of indulgence. And they have the community up in arms over the increase in flight traffic over the area and other CEOs in the area jealous that they weren't the ones to score a Moffett deal.

Actually, maybe these aren't just toys to the Google guys. Maybe they are a reflection that the company has become so important it needs special privileges, and a way to evacuate large groups of people out of the area quickly.

Elinor Mills covers Internet security and privacy. She joined CNET News in 2005 after working as a foreign correspondent for Reuters in Portugal and writing for The Industry Standard, the IDG News Service, and the Associated Press. E-mail Elinor.
advertisement
Click Here
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
1.3 Billion with a B?
by arthurpress October 11, 2007 11:11 AM PDT
errr...1.3 Billion to land their jets or 1.3 million?
Reply to this comment
How much does it cost...
by lmasanti October 11, 2007 11:57 AM PDT
How much does it cost to land these airplanes in a similar airport
elsewhere?
To show this kind of comparison would show --at least in my
opinion-- more professionalism and a little less of sensationalism
by the author.
$1.3 million
by rahodeb October 11, 2007 12:20 PM PDT
If you look at the linked story it's really $1.3 million
Just what shareholders needed...
by mr. cynical October 11, 2007 11:40 AM PDT
....more CEO indulgence. :rollseyes:

Fine if they used their own cash but this was a Google expense. As a shareholder I don't find this a good use of MY money, however miniscule a portion it represents.
Reply to this comment
The article says...
by lmasanti October 11, 2007 11:54 AM PDT
The article says that the company involved H211 LLC is owned by
the founders of Google.
How is it related to Google's shareholders?
It's not 1.3 Billion
by schming66 October 11, 2007 12:00 PM PDT
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9777387-7.html

Here's an earlier article saying the SF Gate reported it was paying
1.3 Million with an M, annualy. Makes much more sense
considering 1.3 billion could buy around 4 or so 757's.
Reply to this comment
Fixed typo
by elinormills October 11, 2007 12:43 PM PDT
Thanks for pointing that out.
Reply to this comment
carbon offsets?
by Jadefa October 11, 2007 1:01 PM PDT
How do you buy a carbon offset? Bull ****! The Lear Jet Liberal Legacy lives on. Hypocrites!
Reply to this comment
carbon offset
by Darryl Snortberry October 11, 2007 6:19 PM PDT
yeah i think it's just pc to say carbon offsets even though it does nothing.
I have a suggestion.
by halfsek October 12, 2007 4:29 PM PDT
If you're so worried about carbon and the environment, how about
you buy offsets without creating more carbon. That way you'll
actually be reducing the amount of carbon in the air rather than
just breaking even.
If not, then at the least, buy double the amount of offsets so you
still "help the environment" in spite of your selfish indulgences.
I've even got a third option. If you're SO worried about carbon, then
web conference for all of your meetings.
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right