'Old fuddy-duddy' can continue age discrimination suit against Google
A tech industry legend who claims Google fired him because he was too old to fit into the company "culture" has just won another shot at making his case in court.
A California state appeals court in San Jose on Thursday threw out a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Internet pioneer Brian Reid. He's best known for helping to create the first firewall, the pioneering AltaVista Internet search engine and the alt.* hierarchy of newsgroups in Usenet.
Reid, who was 54 when he filed his lawsuit in 2004, came to Google as its director of operations and director of engineering in June 2002. He was ultimately fired in February 2004, when he was told by his supervisor that he was not a "cultural fit," according to court filings. For those keeping score, that was not long before Google announced its initial public offering, which Reid's attorneys argued deprived him of millions of dollars in potential stock earnings.
According to court papers, Reid's Google colleagues frequently to him as "old man," "old guy," and "old fuddy-duddy" during his time with the search giant. His boss, then 38-year-old Urs Hoelzle, also made age-related remarks about his performance every few weeks, dismissed his opinions and ideas as "obsolete" and "too old to matter," and called him "fuzzy," "lethargic," and other energy-lacking descriptors, the court filings said. Google, for its part, argued it let Reid go because it eliminated the department, an in-house graduate degree program, to which he had recently been reassigned.
The appeals court said a jury should have been allowed to consider a number of pieces of evidence that Reid presented in support of his case. In addition to the "ageist" comments Reid cited, he also commissioned a statistical analysis, which found younger Google employees typically received better performance ratings and higher bonuses. (Click here for a PDF of the court's opinion.)
Google spokesman Jon Murchison said the company doesn't comment on ongoing litigation, "but as our court filings have stated, we believe this complaint to be unfounded and will vigorously defend against it."






- GoogleWannaBes
- by Broward Horne October 6, 2007 8:20 AM PDT
- I run into the same age issue in interviews. I call them the GoogleWannaBes. There's quite a few of the 20-30 year-old generation that believes themselves to be super-geniuses. They've often oriented around a "priesthood culture of IT" that creates arcane buzzwords and indecipherable wording, creating the illusion of supreme knowledge and almost godlike powers of comprehension.<br /><br />I like to find these things out in interviews, so I tend to bring it out in conversation so the interviewer can easily write me off, saving me the trouble of working at a company that's unpleasant. I have found that the younger generation is literally incapable of working eight hours per day consistently. There's always a 'kid problem', 'doctor appointment', 'air conditioner repairman', 'cable installer', 'car repair', etc, which occurs at on about a bi-weekly basis.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- ....
- by dondarko October 6, 2007 10:00 AM PDT
- I agree with you but I've also seen where older generation workers are lazy, arrogant, ignorant, unwilling and holding everyone back. What's the point of haveing a 40-something worker coming to work his hours like clockwork if all he/she is going to do is surf the net, reading article and watching news clips? <br /><br />So the workforce problems aren't restriced to younger generation, but as the spoiled brat generation starts getting into the workforce it will only increase. And who's fault is it that newer generations are like that? Older generation's spoiling of kids and telling them that they are special(you're only special if you're mentally retarded). So older generations have some blame in this thing.
- Like this
-
(10 Comments)