September 24, 2007 7:00 AM PDT

Tech worker dies in vat of sulfuric acid

by Natalie Weinstein
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 17 comments

A worker at a circuit board factory in Redwood City, Calif., was found dead in a waist-high vat of sulfuric acid over the weekend.

Even more disturbing, the man's body was discovered by his father.

If this hadn't been reported by respectable news agencies, it would have "urban myth" or "bad mafia movie" written all over it.

The news, however, was reported early Sunday by the San Mateo Daily Journal and later expanded by the San Jose Mercury News.

According to the Mercury News, Fernando Jimenez Gonzalez, 18, was working at the Coastal Circuits factory when he apparently passed out from fumes as he dipped circuit boards into a tank for acid copper plating.

When Gonzalez didn't return home from his shift, his father went to search for him. Gonzalez's body was discovered around 2 a.m. Sunday.

A company executive, interviewed by the Mercury News, declined to comment on why police believe Gonzalez wasn't wearing protective gear.

The plant is now closed, according to the Mercury News, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration is investigating.

Natalie Weinstein is an associate editor who works out of Austin, Texas. She spent a decade as a reporter and editor in the newspaper industry before joining the CNET News staff in 2000. E-mail Natalie.
Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia puts NForce chipset development on hold
Opera 10 browser is here
Neil Young Archives Blu-ray: Rip off?
Acronis revises survey results about backup habits
Acronis miscalculates data on users' bad backup habits
Flickr co-founder presses beta button
Comcast, Sony open retail store
Cox to try coaxing the Internet into submission
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Fluent In English?
by Stating September 24, 2007 9:46 AM PDT
Did the victim speak English? Was he here legally? How long had he been working at the factory? Are there other workers at the factory who do not speak English? What are the OSHA requirements for training and multilingual translation of safety placards, manuals, etc.? This story raises more questions than it answers.
Reply to this comment
Re: Fluent in English?
by pctec100 September 24, 2007 10:12 AM PDT
You'll have even more questions if you read the article from San Jose Mercury that they linked too.

There was another employee working with him the night this occurred. The article says about him, "It's unclear why that worker didn't call emergency crews."

It also states that there are signs around the area with emergency numbers posted. One of the numbers is outdated and belongs to a retired employee.
What?
by techhawkfez September 24, 2007 5:16 PM PDT
You're basically assuming that the worker is an illegal because of a last name, and that he doesn't speak English. What the hell?
View reply
What???
by thescale September 24, 2007 10:17 AM PDT
"If this hadn't been reported by respectable news agencies, it would have "urban myth" or "bad mafia movie" written all over it. "

Are you kidding me with this line? Pathetic.
Reply to this comment
not again...
by inachu September 24, 2007 11:40 AM PDT
I read this article fine.....

Then someone spouts off the equivilent, "TYPE IN ENGLISH!"


grow up.
Reply to this comment
Reading comprehension...
by ejevo September 24, 2007 11:47 AM PDT
Work on it.
How Sad...
by chuck_whealton September 24, 2007 3:30 PM PDT
I saw one person commenting from the "was he here legally" angle.

I think you're missing the point, which was that the poor guy died in a vat of sulfuric acid and his Father found him. That's sad as heck.

Geez, have a bit of compassion?

Charles Whealton
Reply to this comment
Safety
by nmoore6676 September 24, 2007 6:12 PM PDT
I have worked in plating and similar businesses. Besides the issues of training and the lack of respirators there is the question why was he alone in the plant. Most factories require that at least two people be on site when any type of machinery or processing is going on. The owners of this business should be behind bars for many years.

By the way if Mr. Gonzalez was undocumented that points up another serious side of that controversy, the exploitation of those who can not complain.
Reply to this comment
The article does not say
by zboot September 24, 2007 9:32 PM PDT
that he was alone.
View reply
Pure Spectacle
by mayhakjm September 24, 2007 9:28 PM PDT
The biggest question this raises for me is why am I even hearing about it: If the vat had been anything but acid, would it have been reported?

It's extremely unfortunate that such a tragedy happened, but it's also sad that "Tech worker dies in vat of acid" is one of CNET's headlines. Aren't there stories out there that have some relevance to the common user? I'm ashamed I clicked the link and supported the practice, but "news" like this really gets to me......
Reply to this comment
Spectacle?
by three_toed_frog September 25, 2007 1:32 PM PDT
The man died in a vat of acid.

Acid, for Christ's sake.

Would you hear about it had he fell into a vat of water?

No. Because he more than likely would have been able to swim and pull himself out. Not an easy task in the case of acid when your flesh is being dissolved.

It's disgusting to see your attitude about it.
Worker Dies in Acid Vat
by shygeek September 25, 2007 7:51 PM PDT
This death was unnecessary. Regardless of whether
the man was undocumented or not, couldn't the
company provide him with a respirator seeing as to
he was working with noxious fumes ?
O.S.H.A. needs to look in this. Someone at that
company dropped the ball. How many other workers
lives and or health are in jeopardy at that plant?
Reply to this comment
Making an Ass of U & Me
by benjwah September 25, 2007 8:31 PM PDT
...Or just you.
The reason investigations are held is to confirm all the facts. I work supervising a factory environment and can tell you for sure that we are constantly trying to get our workers to wear safety gear but there's always a few who take off the gear as soon as we're out of sight. They say it's either 'uncomfortable' or 'inconvenient' or make up other excuses and we reply that they can be 'uncomfortable' or 'in grave danger' and they choose 'in grave danger'.
With that in mind, some companies DO skimp on safety gear and should be prosecuted, but to automatically point the finger at the company shows gross ignorance.
How would you feel if you spent your days trying to ensure your workers' safety only to have one ignore it all and die. Then, to add insult to injury, a chorus of 'holier-than-thou's then points the finger at you for his death?
Poor man
by jehjeh2 September 29, 2007 10:21 PM PDT
I don't know whom I feel worse for--the man who fell or his father who found him. But I would like to know why he wasn't wearing his protective suit. Can't help but wonder if it wasn't foul play after all...
Reply to this comment
More urban legend than fact
by filby October 4, 2007 9:15 AM PDT
The San Jose Mercury News later updated their report to rescind some of that original story. Turns out the vat was mostly water, and only a few feet deep. Later reports said that, even if it was strongly acidic, it wouldn't have caused the worker to lose consciousness. Last I heard, local authorities were still trying to find out why he fell into the vat.
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right